Essay review

References

• Christie , J.R.R. The development of the historiography of science 2. J. R. G. Turner, ‘The history of science and the history of society’; 3. R. Porter, ‘The history of science and the history of society’; 4. L. Laudan, ‘The history of science and the philosophy of science’; 5. B. Barnes, ‘Sociological theories of scientific knowledge’; 6. R. M. Young, ‘Marxism and the history of science’; 7. T. Pinch, ‘The sociology of the scientific community’; 8. J. R. R. Christie, ‘Feminism and the history of science’; 9. J. V. Golinski, ‘Language, discourse and science’; 10. G. Gutting, ‘Continental philosophy and the history of science’; 11. T. Nickles, ‘Discovery’; 12. L. Briskman, ‘Rationality, science and history’; 13. W. H. Newton-Smith, ‘Realism’; 14. J. R. Ravetz, ‘The Copernican Revolution’, 15. J. A. Schuster, ‘The Scientific Revolution’; 16. A. Gabbey, ‘Newton and natural philosophy’; 17. C. E. Perrin, ‘The Chemical Revolution’; 18. R. Fox, ‘Laplacian physics’; 19. P. R. Sloan, ‘Natural history, 1670–1802’; 20. R. Laudan, ‘The history of geology, 1780–1840’; 21. C. Smith, ‘Energy’; 22. M. N. Wise, ‘Electromagnetic theory in the nineteenth century’; 23. J. Maienschein, ‘Cell theory and development’; 24. M. J. S. Hodge, ‘Origins and species before and after Darwin’; 25. K. Danziger, ‘Wilhelm Wundt and the emergence of experimental psychology’; 26. R. Smith, ‘Behaviourism’; 27. R. E. Fancher, ‘Freud and psychoanalysis’; 28. J. Stachel, ‘The theory of relativity’; 29. M. Redhead; ‘Quantum theory’; 30. B. Gerrard, ‘Classical economics and the Keynesian revolution’; 31. N. Morgan, ‘From physiology to biochemistry’; 32. R. Olby, ‘The molecular revolution in biology’; 33. R. Olby, ‘The emergence of genetics’; 34. M. S. Mahoney, ‘Cybernetics and information theory’; 35. A. G. Molland. ‘Aristotelian science’; 36. A. Wear, ‘The heart and blood from Vesalius to Harvey’; 37. J. Henry, ‘Magic and science in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries’; 38. M. Tamny, ‘Atomism and the mechanical philosophy’; 39. S. Schaffer, ‘Newtonianism’; 40. G. N. Cantor, ‘Physical optics’; 41. P. Kerszberg, ‘Cosmology: Newton to Einstein’; 42. J. J. Gray, ‘Geometry and space’; 43. H. Kragh, ‘Particle science’; 44. P. Kitcher, ‘The foundations of mathematics’; 45. I. Hacking, ‘Probability and determinism, 1650–1900’; 46. R. M. Young, ‘The mind-body problem’; 47. G. W. Stocking, ‘Paradigmatic traditions in the history of anthropology’; 48. J. V. Pickstone, ‘Physiology and experimental medicine’; 49. D. N. Livingstone, ‘Geography’; 50. J. H. Brooke, ‘Science and religion’; 51. G. Beer, ‘Science and literature’; 52. G. Macdonald Ross, ‘Science and philosophy’; 53. E. McMullin, ‘The development of philosophy of science, 1600–1900’; 54. M. J. S. Hodge and G. N. Cantor, ‘The development of philosophy of science since 1900’; 55. N. Fisher, ‘The classification of the sciences’; 56. S. H. Mauskopf, ‘Marginal science’; 57. R. M. Young, ‘Science, alienation and oppression’; 58. J. R. Ravetz, ‘Orthodoxies, critiques and alternatives’; 59. B. Schroeder-Gudehus, ‘Nationalism and internationalism’; 60. L. Pyenson, ‘Science and imperialism’; 61. D. E. M. Edgerton, ‘Science and war’; 62. W. H. Brock, ‘Science education’; 63. R. L. Emerson, ‘The organisation of science and its pursuit in early modern Europe’; 64. J. B. Morrell, ‘Professionalisation’; 65. S. Shapin, ‘Science and the public’; 66. D. Outram, ‘Science and political ideology, 1790–1848’; 67. T. M. Porter, ‘Natural science and social theory’.
   Google Scholar
• Cf. Perrin C.E. Document, Text and Myth: Lavoisier's Crucial Year Revisited The British Journal for the History of Science 1989 22 3 25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen , E. 1984 . Copernicus and the Scientific Revolution 131 – 131 . Malabar, Florida
   Google Scholar