Front-fixing FEMs for the pricing of American options based on a PML technique

References

• Allegretto W, Lin Y, Yang H. Finite element error estimates for a nonlocal problem in American option valuation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2001;39:834–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok YK. Mathematical models of financial derivatives. 2nd ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Finance; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Ross SA, Rubinstein M. Option pricing: a simplified approach. J. Fin. Econ. 1979;7:229–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin K, Khanna A. Convergence of American option values from discrete – to continuous time financial models. Math. Finance. 1994;4:289–304.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan M, Schwartz E. Finite difference methods and jump processes arising in the pricing of contingent claims: a synthesis. J. Fin. Quan. Anal. 1978;13:461–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han H, Wu X. A fast numerical method for the Black–Scholes equation of American options. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2003;41:2081–2095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaillet P, Lamberton D, Lapeyre B. Variational inequalities and the pricing of American options. Acta Appl. Math. 1990;21:263–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle P, Broadie M, Glasserman P. Monte Carlo methods for security pricing. J. Econom. Dynam. Control. 1997;21:1267–1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longstaff FA, Schwartz ES. Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2001;14:113–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers LCG. Monte Carlo valuation of American options. Math. Finance. 2002;12:271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes AD, Yang H. A front-fixing finite element method for the valuation of american options. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2008;30:2158–2180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau HG. Heat conduction in a melting solid. Quar. Appl. Math. 1950;8:81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu LX, Kwok YK. A front-fixing finite difference method for the valuation of American options. J. Financ. Eng. 1997;6:83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Kangro P, Nicolaides R. Far field boundary conditions for Black–Scholes equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2000;38:1357–1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon JR. The one-dimensional heat equation. Vol. 23, Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Carslawand HS, Jaeqer JC. Conduction of heat in solids, conduction of heat in solids. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Wong HY, Zhao J. An artificial boundary method for American option pricing under the CEV model. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2008;46:2183–2209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenger JP. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J. Comput. Phys. 1994;114:185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao G, Wu HJ. Convergence analysis of the PML problems for time-harmonic Maxwell’s equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2005;43:2121–2143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramble JH, Pasciak JE, Trenev D. Analysis of a finite PML approximation to the three dimensional elastic wave scattering problem. Math. Comp. 2010;79:2079–2101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZM, Wu HJ. An adaptive finite element method with perfectly matched absorbing layers for the wave scattering by periodic structures. SIAM. J. Numer. Anal. 2003;41:799–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin YP, Zhang K, Zou J. Studies on some perfectly matched layers for one-dimensional time-dependent systems. Adv. Comput. Math. 2009;30:1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold DN, Brezzi F, Cockburn B, Marini LD. Unified analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 2002;39:1749–1779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn B, Karniadakis GE, Shu CW. Discontinuous Galerkin methods. Theory, computation and applications. Vol. 11, Lecture notes in computational science and engineering. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hesthaven JS, Warburton T. Nodal discontinuous Galerkin methods: algorithms, analysis, and applications. Vol. 54, Springer texts in applied mathematics. New York (NY): Springer Verlag; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Di Pietro DA, Ern A. Mathematical aspects of discontinuous Galerkin methods. Vol. 69, Mathmatiques et Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman A. Partial differential equations of parabolic type. Malabar (FL): Krieger; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Hull J. Fundamentals of futures and options markets. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Badea L, Wang J. A new formulation for the valuation of American options, I: solution uniqueness. Anal. Sci. Comput. 1999;19:3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Badea L, Wang J. A new formulation for the valuation of American options, II: solution existence. Anal. Sci. Comput. 1999;19:17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang LS. Mathematical modeling and methods of option pricing. Singapore: World Scientific Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Berenger JP. Three-dimensional perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J. Comput. Phys. 1996;127:363–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu ZQ, Yin JX, Wang CP. Elliptic and parabolic equations. Singapore: World Scientific; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lantos N, Nataf F. Perfectly matched layers for the heat and advection–diffusion equations. J. Comput. Phys. 2010;229:9042–9052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams RA. Sobolev spaces. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Riviere B. Discontinuous Galerkin methods for solving elliptic and parabolic equations: theory and implementation. Frontiers in applied mathematics. Philadelphia (PA): SIAM; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Egger H, Engl HW, Klibanov MV. Global uniqueness and Hölder stability for recovering a nonlinear source term in a parabolic equation. Inverse Probl. 2005;21:271–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanov MV, Tikhonravov AV. Estimates of initial conditions of parabolic equations and inequalities in infinite domains via lateral Cauchy data. J. Differ. Eqn. 2007;237:198–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar