Existence and nonexistence results for generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equations of Kirchhoff type in ℝ³

References

• Deng Y, Peng S, Yan S. Positive soliton solutions for generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equations with critical growth. J Differ Equ. 2015;258:115–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Wang Y. Soliton solutions for generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equations. Nonlinear Anal. 2013;80:194–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Huang W. Ground state solutions for generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equations without (AR) condition. J Math Anal Appl. 2017;456:927–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Huang W. Positive ground state solutions for a quasilinear elliptic equation with critical exponent. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst. 2017;37:4213–4230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Y, Lin F. Solutions of perturbed Schrödinger equations with critical nonlinearity. Calc Var Partial Differ Equ. 2007;30:231–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Y, Liu X. Semiclassical solutions of Schrödinger equations with magnetic fields and critical nonlinearities. Manuscripta Math. 2013;140:51–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Qian A, Zou W. Existence and concentration of positive solutions for quasilinear Schrödinger equations with critical growth. Nonlinearity. 2013;26:3137–3168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Li G. Concentration soliton solutions for quasilinear Schröinger equations involving critical Sobolev exponents. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst. 2016;36:731–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Zhu X, Liang Z. Multiple solutions to a class of generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equations with a Kirchhoff-type perturbation. J Math Anal Appl. 2016;443:11–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zhang Y. Solutions for a class of quasilinear Schrödinger equations with critical Sobolev exponents. J Math Phys. 2017;58:021501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen L. Ground state solutions for a class of generalized quasilinear Schrödinger–Poisson systems. Boundary Value Probl. 2018;2018:44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Li F, Liang Z. Existence of ground state solutions to a generalized quasilinear Schrödinger–Maxwell system. J Math Phys. 2016;57:101505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchhoff G. Mechanik. Leipzig: Teubner; 1883.
   Google Scholar
• Lions JL. On some questions in boundary value problems of mathematical physics. In: Contemporary Developments in Continuum Mechanics and Partial Differential Equations, Proceedings of International Symposium, Inst. Mat. Univ. Fed. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 1977. North-Holland, Amsterdam; 1978. p. 284–346. (North-Holland Math. Stud.; vol. 30).
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Tang X, Cheng B. Existence and nonexistence of positive solutions for a class of generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equations involving a Kirchhoff-type perturbation with critical Sobolev exponent. J Math Phys. 2018;59:021505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Peng S, Shuai W. Existence and asympototic behavior of nodal solutions for the Kirchhoff type problems in R3. J Funct Anal. 2015;269:3500–3527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Shuai W. Sign-changing multi-bump solutions for Kirchhoff-type equations in R3. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst. 2018;38:3139–3168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo GM, Ikoma N, Júnior JR. Existence and concentration result for the Kirchhoff type equations with general nonlinearities. Arch Rational Mech Anal. 2014;213:931–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Z. Ground states for Kirchhoff equations without compact condition. J Differ Equ. 2015;259:2884–2902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Zou W. Existence and concentration behavior of positive solutions for a Kirchhoff equation in R3. J Differ Equ. 2012;2:1813–1834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Li G. Standing waves for a class of Kirchhoff type problems in R3 involving critical Sobolev exponents. Calc Var Partial Differ Equ. 2015;54:3067–3106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y. Concentrating bounded states for a class of singularly perturbed Kirchhoff type equations with a general nonlinearity. J Differ Equ. 2016;261:6178–6220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Ye H. Existence of positive ground state solutions for the nonlinear Kirchhoff type equations in R3. J Differ Equ. 2014;257:566–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuai W. Sign-changing solutions for a class of Kirchhoff-type problem in bounded domains. J Differ Equ. 2015;259:1256–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Tian L, Xu J, et al. Multiplicity and concentration of positive solutions for a Kirchhoff type problem with critical growth. J Differ Equ. 2012;253:2314–2351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye H. Positive high energy solution for Kirchhoff equation in R3 with superlinear nonlinearities via Nehair–Pohozaev manifold. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst. 2015;35:3857–3877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willem M. Minimax theorems. Boston: Birkhäuser; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Berestycki H, Lions PL. Nonlinear scalar field equations I, existence of a ground state. Arch Ration Mech Anal. 1983;82:313–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeanjean L. On the existence of bounded Palais–Smale sequences and application to a Landesman–Lazer type problem set on RN. Proc Roy Soc Edinburgh Sect A. 1999;129:787–809.
   Google Scholar
• Lions PL. The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variation. The locally compact case. Part I. Ann Inst H Poincaré Anal Non Linéaire. 1984;1:109–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lions PL. The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variation. The locally compact case. Part II. Ann Inst H Poincaré Anal Non Linéaire. 1984;1:223–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeanjean L. Existence of solutions with prescribed norm for semilinear elliptic equations. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl. 1997;28:1633–1659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz PH. On a class of nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Z Angew Math Phys. 1992;43:270–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekeland I. Nonconvex minimization problems. Bull Amer Math Soc. 1979;1:443–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chabrowski J. Weak convergence methods for semilinear elliptic equations. River Edge (NJ): World Scientific; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Brézis H, Lieb E. A relation between pointwise convergence of functions and convergence of functionals. Proc Amer Math Soc. 1983;88:486–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Luo P, Peng S, et al. Uniqueness and nondegeneracy of positive solutions to Kirchhoff equations and its applications in singular perturbation problems. arXiv:1703.05459.
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch T, Weth T. Three nodal solutions of singularly perturbed elliptic equations on domains with topology. Ann I H Poincare-AN. 2005;22:259–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerami G, Passaseo D. The effect of concentrating potentials in some singularly perturbed problems. Calc Var Partial Differ Equ. 2003;17:257–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolo P, Benci V, Fortunato D. Abstract critical theorems and applications to some nonlinear problems with strong resonance at infinity. Nonlinear Anal. 1983;7:981–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechter M. Linking methods in critical point theory. Boston: Birkhäuser; 1999.
   Google Scholar