Solvability of a Keller–Segel system with signal-dependent sensitivity and essentially sublinear production

References

• Keller EF, Segel LA. Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. J Theor Biol. 1970;26(3):399–415. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(70)90092-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller EF, Segel LA. Traveling bands of chemotactic bacteria: a theoretical analysis. J Theor Biol. 1971;30(2):235. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90051-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osaki K, Yagi A. Finite dimensional attractor for one-dimensional Keller–Segel equations. Funkcial Ekvacioj. 2001;44(3):441–470.
   Google Scholar
• Horstmann D, Wang G. Blow-up in a chemotaxis model without symmetry assumptions. Eur J Appl Math. 2001;12(2):159–177. doi: 10.1017/S0956792501004363
   Google Scholar
• Winkler M. Finite-time blow-up in the higher-dimensional parabolic-parabolic Keller–Segel system. J Math Pure Appl. 2013;100(5):748–767. doi: 10.1016/j.matpur.2013.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäger W, Luckhaus S. On explosions of solutions to a system of partial differential equations modelling chemotaxis. Trans Am Math Soc. 1992;329(2):819–824. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1992-1046835-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagai T. Blowup of nonradial solutions to parabolic-elliptic systems modeling chemotaxis in two-dimensional domains. J Inequal Appl. 2001;6(1):37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellomo N, Bellouquid A, Tao Y, Winkler M. Toward a mathematical theory of Keller–Segel models of pattern formation in biological tissues. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2015;25(09):1663–1763. doi: 10.1142/S021820251550044X
   Google Scholar
• Hillen T, Painter KJ. A user's guide to PDE models for chemotaxis. J Math Biol. 2009;58(1):183–217. doi: 10.1007/s00285-008-0201-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankeit J. Eventual smoothness and asymptotics in a three-dimensional chemotaxis system with logistic source. J Differ Equ. 2015;258(4):1158–1191. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2014.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tello JI, Winkler M. A chemotaxis system with logistic source. Commun Part Differ Equ. 2007;32(6):849–877. doi: 10.1080/03605300701319003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglialoro G. Very weak global solutions to a parabolic–parabolic chemotaxis-system with logistic source. J Math Anal Appl. 2016;439(1):197–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.02.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglialoro G. Boundedness properties of very weak solutions to a fully parabolic chemotaxis-system with logistic source. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2017;34:520–535. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2016.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglialoro G, Woolley T. Eventual smoothness and asymptotic behaviour of solutions to a chemotaxis system perturbed by a logistic growth. Discrete Continuous Dyn Syst Ser B. 2018;23(8):3023–3045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler M. Blow-up in a higher-dimensional chemotaxis system despite logistic growth restriction. J Math Anal Appl. 2011;384(2):261–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.05.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler M. Finite-time blow-up in low-dimensional Keller–Segel systems with logistic-type superlinear degradation. Z Angew Math Phys. 2018;69(2):553. doi: 10.1007/s00033-018-0935-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeman BD, Levine HA. Partial differential equations of chemotaxis and angiogenesis. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2001;24(6):405–426. doi: 10.1002/mma.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens A, Othmer HG. Aggregation, blowup, and collapse: the abc's of taxis in reinforced random walks. SIAM J Appl Math. 1997;57(4):1044–1081. doi: 10.1137/S0036139995288976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biler P. Local and global solvability of some parabolic systems modelling chemotaxis. Adv Math Sci Appl. 1998;8(2):715–743.
   Google Scholar
• Nagai T, Senba T. Global existence and blow-up of radial solutions to a parabolic-elliptic system of chemotaxis. Adv Math Sci Appl. 1998;8(1):145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Fujie K, Winkler M, Yokota T. Boundedness of solutions to parabolic–elliptic Keller–Segel systems with signal-dependent sensitivity. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2015;38(6):1212–1224. doi: 10.1002/mma.3149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujie K, Winkler M, Yokota T. Blow-up prevention by logistic sources in a parabolic-elliptic Keller–Segel system with singular sensitivity. Nonlinear Anal. 2014;109:56–71. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2014.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankeit J. A new approach toward boundedness in a two-dimensional parabolic chemotaxis system with singular sensitivity. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2016;39(3):394–404. doi: 10.1002/mma.3489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglialoro G. Global in time and bounded solutions to a parabolic–elliptic chemotaxis system with nonlinear diffusion and signal-dependent sensitivity. Preprint
   Google Scholar
• Black T. Sublinear signal production in a two-dimensional Keller–Segel–Stokes system. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2016;31:593–609. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2016.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D-m, Tao Y-s. Boundedness in a chemotaxis system with nonlinear signal production. Appl Math J Chin Univ. 2016;31(4):379–388. doi: 10.1007/s11766-016-3386-z
   Google Scholar
• Nirenberg L. On elliptic partial differential equations. Ann Scuola Norm Sup Pisa (3). 1959;13:115–162.
   Google Scholar
• Brezis H. Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial differential equations. New York: Universitext. Springer; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ladyženskaja OA, Solonnikov VA, Ural'ceva NN. Linear and Quasi-Linear equations of parabolic type. In: Translations of mathematical monographs. Vol. 23. American Mathematical Society; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler M. Aggregation vs. global diffusive behavior in the higher-dimensional Keller–Segel model. J Differ Equ. 2010;248(12):2889–2905. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2010.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascher UM, Ruuth SJ, Spiteri RJ. Implicit–explicit Runge–Kutta methods for time-dependent partial differential equations. Appl Numer Math. 1997;25(2-3):151–167. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9274(97)00056-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar