Reconstruction of contact regions in semiconductor transistors using Dirichlet-Neumann cost functional approach

References

• Gilbarg D, Trudinger NS. Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. New York: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fang W, Cumberbatch E. Inverse problems for metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor contact resistivity. SIAM J Appl Math. 1992;52(3):699–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh W, Saraswat K, Dutton R. Analysis and scaling of Kelvin resistors for extraction of specific contact resistivity. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 1985;6(3):105–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh WM, Swirhun SE, Schreyer TA, et al. Modeling and measurement of contact resistances. IEEE Trans Electron Devices. 1987;34(3):512–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettlich F, Rundell W. Recovery of the support of a source term in an elliptic differential equation. Inverse Probl. 1997;13(4):959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang W, Ito K. Identification of contact regions in semiconductor transistors by level-set methods. J Comput Appl Math. 2003;159(2):399–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang W, Zeng S. Recovery of an interface from boundary measurement in an elliptic differential equation. Adv Comput Math. 2012;36(2):201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin L, Elliott L, Ingham D, et al. The boundary element method for the numerical recovery of a circular inhomogeneity in an elliptic equation. Eng Anal Bound Elem. 2004;28(4):413–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethian JA. Level set methods and fast marching methods: evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision, and materials science. Vol. 3. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kress R, Rundell W. Nonlinear integral equations and the iterative solution for an inverse boundary value problem. Inverse Probl. 2005;21(4):1207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busenberg S, Fang W. Identification of semiconductor contact resistivity. Quart Appl Math. 1991;49(4):639–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez L, Novotny A, Prakash R. Noniterative reconstruction method for an inverse potential problem modeled by a modified Helmholtz equation. Numer Funct Anal Optim. 2018;39:937–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammari H, Garnier J, Nguyen LH, et al. Reconstruction of a piecewise smooth absorption coefficient by an acousto-optic process. Commun Partial Differ Equ. 2013;38(10):1737–1762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammari H, Bossy E, Garnier J, et al. A reconstruction algorithm for ultrasound-modulated diffuse optical tomography. Proc Amer Math Soc. 2014;142(9):3221–3236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammari H, Nguyen LH, Seppecher L. Reconstruction and stability in acousto-optic imaging for absorption maps with bounded variation. J Funct Anal. 2014;267(11):4361–4398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanov MV, Kolesov AE, Nguyen DL. Convexification method for a coefficient inverse problem and its performance for experimental backscatter data for buried targets. Preprint, 2018. arXiv:180507618.
   Google Scholar
• Klibanov MV, Kolesov AE. Convexification of a 3-D coefficient inverse scattering problem. Comput Math Appl. 2018;77:1681–1702.
   Google Scholar
• Klibanov MV, Koshev NA, Nguyen DL, et al. A numerical method to solve a phaseless coefficient inverse problem from a single measurement of experimental data. Preprint, 2018. arXiv:180301374.
   Google Scholar
• Klibanov MV, Kolesov AE, Nguyen L, et al. Globally strictly convex cost functional for a 1-D inverse medium scattering problem with experimental data. SIAM J Appl Math. 2017;77(5):1733–1755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanov MV, Nguyen DL, Nguyen LH. A coefficient inverse problem with a single measurement of phaseless scattering data. SIAM J Appl Math. 2019;79(1):1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen DL, Klibanov MV, Nguyen LH, et al. Numerical solution of a coefficient inverse problem with multi-frequency experimental raw data by a globally convergent algorithm. J Comput Phys. 2017;345:17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrizi M, Hassine M, Malek R. A new reconstruction method for a parabolic inverse source problem. Appl Anal. 2018;1–33. DOI:10.1080/00036811.2018.1469011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotny AA, Sokołowski J. Topological derivatives in shape optimization. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kang H, Kwon K, Yun K. Recovery of an inhomogeneity in an elliptic equation. Inverse Probl. 2001;17(1):25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S. Unique determination of inhomogeneity in an elliptic equation. Inverse Probl. 2002;18(5):1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choulli M. On the determination of an inhomogeneity in an elliptic equation. Appl Anal. 2006;85(6–7):693–699.
   Google Scholar
• Brezis H. Functional analysis, sobolev spaces and partial differential equations. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler A, Fry B, Neuman M. Impedance-computed tomography algorithm and system. Appl Opt. 1985;24(23):3985–3992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn RV, Vogelius M. Relaxation of a variational method for impedance computed tomography. Commun Pure Appl Math. 1987;40(6):745–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amstutz S, Horchani I, Masmoudi M. Crack detection by the topological gradient method. Control Cybernet. 2005;34(1):81–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bacani JB, Peichl G. On the first-order shape derivative of the Kohn-Vogelius cost functional of the bernoulli problem. Abstr Appl Anal. 2013;2013. DOI:10.1155/2013/384320.
   Google Scholar
• Canelas A, Laurain A, Novotny AA. A new reconstruction method for the inverse source problem from partial boundary measurements. Inverse Probl. 2015;31(7):075009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppler K, Harbrecht H. On a kohn-vogelius like formulation of free boundary problems. Comput Optim Appl. 2012;52(1):69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abda AB, Hassine M, Jaoua M, et al. Topological sensitivity analysis for the location of small cavities in Stokes flow. SIAM J Control Optim. 2009;48(5):2871–2900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrizi M, Hassine M. One-iteration reconstruction algorithm for geometric inverse source problem. J Elliptic Parabolic Equ. 2018;4(1):177–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher A. Topologieoptimierung von bauteilstrukturen unter verwendung von lochpositionierungskriterien [dissertation]. Forschungszentrum für Multidisziplinäre Analysen und Angewandte Strukturoptimierung. Institut für Mechanik und Regelungstechnik; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolowski J, Zochowski A. On the topological derivative in shape optimization. SIAM J Control Optim. 1999;37(4):1251–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masmoudi M. The topological asymptotic, computational methods for control applications. In: Kawarada H, périaux J, editors. Gakuto; 2002. (International series).
   Google Scholar
• Garreau S, Guillaume P, Masmoudi M. The topological asymptotic for pde systems: the elasticity case. SIAM J Control Optim. 2001;39(6):1756–1778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelwahed M, Hassine M. Topological optimization method for a geometric control problem in Stokes flow. Appl Numer Math. 2009;59(8):1823–1838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassine M, Masmoudi M. The topological asymptotic expansion for the quasi-Stokes problem. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var. 2004;10(4):478–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amstutz S. The topological asymptotic for the Navier-Stokes equations. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var. 2005;11(3):401–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samet B, Amstutz S, Masmoudi M. The topological asymptotic for the Helmholtz equation. SIAM J Control Optim. 2003;42(5):1523–1544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pommier J, Samet B. The topological asymptotic for the Helmholtz equation with Dirichlet condition on the boundary of an arbitrarily shaped hole. SIAM J Control Optim. 2004;43(3):899–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masmoudi M, Pommier J, Samet B. The topological asymptotic expansion for the Maxwell equations and some applications. Inverse Probl. 2005;21(2):547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez N, Gibiat V, Esquerre Y. Time domain topological gradient and time reversal analogy: an inverse method for ultrasonic target detection. Wave Motion. 2005;42(1):31–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnet M. Topological sensitivity for 3D elastodynamic and acoustic inverse scattering in the time domain. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2006;195(37–40):5239–5254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassine M, Jan S, Masmoudi M. From differential calculus to 0-1 topological optimization. SIAM J Control Optim. 2007;45(6):1965–1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Céa J. Conception optimale ou identification de formes, calcul rapide de la dérivée directionnelle de la fonction coût. ESAIM Math Model Numer Anal. 1986;20(3):371–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferchichi J, Hassine M, Khenous H. Detection of point-forces location using topological algorithm in Stokes flows. Appl Math Comput. 2013;219(12):7056–7074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jleli M, Samet B, Vial G. Topological sensitivity analysis for the modified Helmholtz equation under an impedance condition on the boundary of a hole. J Math Pures Appl. 2015;103(2):557–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amstutz S, Andrä H. A new algorithm for topology optimization using a level-set method. J Comput Phys. 2006;216(2):573–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isakov V. Inverse problems for partial differential equations. Vol. 127. New York: Springer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Andrieux S, Baranger T, Abda AB. Solving Cauchy problems by minimizing an energy-like functional. Inverse Probl. 2006;22(1):115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caubet F, Dambrine M. Localization of small obstacles in Stokes flow. Inverse Probl. 2012;28(10):105007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaabane S, Elhechmi C, Jaoua M. A stable recovery method for the robin inverse problem. Math Comput Simul. 2004;66(4–5):367–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar