Asymptotic dynamics and spatial patterns of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system with prey-taxis

References

• Grünbaum D. Using spatially explicit models to characterize foraging performance in heterogeneous landscapes. Am Nat. 1998;151(2):97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch WW, Chesson J, Chesson PL. Biological control in theory and practice. Am Nat. 1985;125(3):344–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapoukhina N, Tyutyunov Y, Arditi R. The role of prey taxis in biological control: a spatial theoretical model. Am Nat. 2003;162(1):61–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kareiva P, Odell G. Swarms of predators exhibit ‘preytaxi’ if individual predators use area-restricted search. Am Nat. 1987;130(2):233–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet RM, Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ. Consumer-resource dynamics (Monographs in population biology). Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Turchin P. Complex population dynamics: a theoretical/empirical synthesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Shi J, Wei J. Predator–prey system with strong allee effect in prey. J Math Biol. 2011;62(3):291–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Hillen T, Lewis MA. Continuous traveling waves for prey-taxis. Bull Math Biol. 2008;70(3):654–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Hillen T, Lewis MA. Pattern formation in prey-taxis systems. J Biol Dyn. 2009;3(6):551–573.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chakraborty A, Singh M, Lucy D, et al. Predator–prey model with prey-taxis and diffusion. Math Comput Model. 2007;46(3):482–498.
   Google Scholar
• Wu S, Shi J, Wu B. Global existence of solutions and uniform persistence of a diffusive predator–prey model with prey-taxis. J Differ Equ. 2016;260(7):5847–5874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin HY, Wang Z-A. Global stability of prey–taxis systems. J Differ Equ. 2017;262(3):1257–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainseba BE, Bendahmane M, Noussair A. A reaction–diffusion system modeling predator–prey with prey-taxis. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2008;9(5):2086–2105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Zheng S. Global boundedness of solutions in a reaction–diffusion system of predator–prey model with prey-taxis. Appl Math Lett. 2015;49:73–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao Y. Global existence of classical solutions to a predator–prey model with nonlinear prey-taxis. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2010;11(3):2056–2064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Wang X, Shao Y. Steady states of a predator–prey model with prey-taxis. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl. 2014;97:155–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wang W, Zhang G. Global bifurcation of solutions for a predator–prey model with prey-taxis. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2015;38(3):431–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Song Y, Shao L. Nonconstant positive steady states and pattern formation of 1d prey-taxis systems. J Nonlinear Sci. 2017;27(1):71–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin HY, Wang Z-A. Global dynamics and spatio-temporal patterns of predator–prey systems with density-dependent motion. Eur J Appl Math. 2019; in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resit Akcakaya H. Population cycles of mammals: evidence for a ratio-dependent predation hypothesis. Ecol Monogr. 1992;62(1):119–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akcakaya HR, Arditi R, Ginzburg LR. Ratio-dependent predation: an abstraction that works. Ecology. 1995;76(3):995–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditi R, Ginzburg LR. Coupling in predator–prey dynamics: ratio-dependence. J Theor Biol. 1989;139(3):311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditi R, Ginzburg LR, Akcakaya HR. Variation in plankton densities among lakes: a case for ratio-dependent predation models. Am Nat. 1991;138(5):1287–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosner C, DeAngelis DL, Ault JS, et al. Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators. Theor Popul Biol. 1999;56(1):65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu SB, Hwang TW, Kuang Y. Global analysis of the Michaelis–Menten-type ratio-dependent predator–prey system. J Math Biol. 2001;42(6):489–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang Y. Rich dynamics of gause-type ratio-dependent predator–prey system. Fields Inst Commun. 1999;21:325–337.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao D, Jennings LS. Bifurcations of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system with constant rate harvesting. SIAM J Appl Math. 2005;65(3):737–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang YH, Wang M. Qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system with diffusion. Proc Roy Soc Edinburgh Sect A Math. 2003;133(04):919–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan YH, Li WT. Global asymptotic stability of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system with diffusion. J Comput Appl Math. 2006;188(2):205–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YM. Numerical solutions of a Michaelis–Menten-type ratio-dependent predator–prey system with diffusion. Appl Numer Math. 2009;59(5):1075–1093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee M. Self-replication of spatial patterns in a ratio-dependent predator–prey model. Math Comput Model. 2010;51(1):44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Song Y, Zou X. Bifurcation analysis of a diffusive ratio-dependent predator–prey model. Nonlinear Dyn. 2014;78(1):49–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Zou X. Spatiotemporal dynamics in a diffusive ratio-dependent predator–prey model near a Hopf–Turing bifurcation point. Comput Math Appl. 2014;67(10):1978–1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L. Spatial pattern formation of a ratio-dependent predator prey model. Chinese Phys B. 2010;19(9):090206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao F, Kang Y. The complex dynamics of a diffusive prey–predator model with an allee effect in prey. Ecol Complexity. 2016;28:123–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amann H. Dynamic theory of quasilinear parabolic equations. ii. reaction–diffusion systems. Differ Integral Equ. 1990;3(1):13–75.
   Google Scholar
• Amann H. Nonhomogeneous linear and quasilinear elliptic and parabolic boundary value problems. Function spaces, differential operators and nonlinear analysis. Springer; 1993. p. 9–126.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler M. Aggregation vs. global diffusive behavior in the higher-dimensional keller–segel model. J Differ Equ. 2010;248(12):2889–2905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao Y, Wang Z-A. Competing effects of attraction vs. repulsion in chemotaxis. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2013;23(01):1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao D, Ruan S. Global dynamics of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system. J Math Biol. 2001;43(3):268–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amann H. Dynamic theory of quasilinear parabolic systems,iii:global existence. Mathematische Zeitschrift. 1989;202(2):219–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sastry S. Nonlinear systems: analysis, stability, and control. Berkeley: University of California; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• LaSalle J. Some extensions of liapunov's second method. IRE Trans Circuit Theory. 1960;7(4):520–527.
   Google Scholar
• Porzio MM, Vespri V. Hölder estimates for local solutions of some doubly nonlinear degenerate parabolic equations. J Differ Equ. 1993;103:146–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao Y, Winkler M. Large time behavior in a multidimensional chemotaxis–haptotaxis model with slow signal diffusion. SIAM J Math Anal. 2015;47(6):4229–4250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladyzhenskaya O, Solonnikov V, Uralceva N. Linear and quasilinear equations of parabolic type. Providence (RI): AMS; 1968.
   Google Scholar