References
- Chapman SJ. A hierarchy of models for type-II superconductors. SIAM Review. 2000;42(4):555–598. doi: https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144599371913
- Zhan M. Phase-lock equations and its connections to Ginzburg–Landau equations of superconductivity. Nonlinear Anal. 2000;42:1063–1075. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(99)00172-8
- Zhan M. Well-posedness of phase-lock equations of superconductivity. Appl Math Lett. 2005;18(11):1210–1215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2005.02.009
- Fan J, Ozawa T. Global well-posedness of weak solutions to the time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau model for superconductivity. Taiwanese J Math. 2018;22(4):851–858. doi: https://doi.org/10.11650/tjm/180102
- Fan J, Ozawa T. Uniqueness of weak solutions to the Ginzburg–Landau model for superconductivity. Z Angew Math Phys. 2012;63(3):453–459. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-011-0164-x
- Fan J, Gao H, Guo B. Uniqueness of weak solutions to the 3D Ginzburg–Landau superconductivity model. Int Math Res Not IMRN. 2015;2015(5):1239–1246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnt253
- Fan J, Gao H. Uniqueness of weak solutions in critical space of the 3D time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau equations for supereconductivity. Math Nachr. 2010;283(8):1134–1143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.200710083
- Kato T, Ponce G. Commutator estimates and the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. Commun Pure Appl Math. 1988;41:891–907. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160410704