Existence and uniqueness of invariant measures of 3D stochastic MHD-α model driven by degenerate noise

References

• Chandrasekhar S. Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1961. xix+654 pp. (The international series of monographs on physics).
   Google Scholar
• Sritharan SS, Sundar P. The stochastic magneto-hydrodynamic system. Infin Dimens Anal Quantum Probab Relat Top. 1999;2(2):241–265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219025799000138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sango M. Magnetohydrodynamic turbulent flows: existence results. Phys D. 2010;239(12):912–923. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2010.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Foias C, Holm D, et al. Camassa-Holm equations as a closure model for turbulent channel and pipe flow. Phys Rev Lett. 1998;81(24):5338–5341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Foias C, Holm D, et al. A connection between the Camassa-Holm equations and turbulent flows in channels and pipes. Phys Fluids. 1999;11(8):2343–2353. The International Conference on Turbulence; Los Alamos, NM; 1998. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.870096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Foias C, Holm D, et al. The Camassa-Holm equations and turbulence. Physica D. 1999;133(1–4):49–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(99)00098-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chepyzhov V, Titi ES, Vishik MI. On the convergence of solutions of the Leray-α model to the trajectory attractor of the 3D Navier–Stokes system. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst. 2007;17(3):481–500. doi: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2007.17.481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheskidov A, Holm DD, Olson E, et al. On a Leray-α model of turbulence. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2005;461(2055):629–649. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2004.1373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foias C, Holm DD, Titi ES. The Navier–Stokes-alpha model of fluid turbulence. Phys D. 2001;152–153:505–519. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(01)00191-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foias C, Holm DD, Titi ES. The three dimensional viscous Camassa-Holm equations, and their relation to the Navier–Stokes equations and turbulence theory. J Dyn Differ Equ. 2002;14:1–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012984210582
   Google Scholar
• Linshiz JS, Titi ES. Analytical study of certain magnetohydrodynamic-α models. J Math Phys. 2007;48: Article ID 065504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2360145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anh CT, Son DT, Toi VM. Regularity of global attractor for a 3D magnetohydrodynamic-α model. Ann Polon Math. 2017;120(2):97–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.4064/ap170505-18-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington N. Low regularity global solutions for a generalized MHD-α system. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2017;38:171–183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2017.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Fan J. Time decay rate for two 3D magnetohydrodynamics-α models. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2014;37(6):838–845. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.2840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deugoue G. Approximation of the trajectory attractor of the 3D MHD system. Commun Pure Appl Anal. 2013;12(5):2119–2144. doi: https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.2119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deugoue G, Razafimandimby PA, Sango M. On the 3D stochastic magnetohydrodynamic-α model. Stoch Process Appl. 2012;122:2211–2248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R. Backward uniqueness of 3D MHD-α model driven by linear multiplicative Gaussian noise. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.5756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Prato G, Zabczyk J. Ergodicity for infinite dimensional systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hairer M, Mattingly J. Ergodicity of the 2D Navier–Stokes equations with degenerate stochastic forcing. Ann Math (2). 2006;164(3):993–1032. doi: https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2006.164.993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuksin S, Shirikyan A. Ergodicity for the randomly forced 2D Navier–Stokes equations. Math Phys Anal Geom. 2001;4:147–195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011989910997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuksin S, Shirikyan A. A coupling approach to randomly forced PDE's I. Comm Math Phys. 2001;221(2):351–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200100479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuksin S, Piatnitski A, Shirikyan A. A coupling approach to randomly forced PDE's II. Comm Math Phys. 2002;230(1):81–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-002-0707-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odasso C. Exponential mixing for stochastic PDEs: the non-additive case. Probab Theory Related Fields. 2008;140(1–2):41–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-007-0057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odasso C. Ergodicity for the stochastic complex Ginzburg-Landau equations. Ann Inst H Poincaré Probab Statist. 2006;42(4):417–454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpb.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röckner M, Zhang X. Stochastic tamed 3D Navier–Stokes equations: existence, uniqueness and ergodicity. Probab Theory Related Fields. 2009;145(1–2):211–267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-008-0167-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen T, Huang J. Ergodicity of 2D stochastic Ginzburg-Landau-Newell equations driven by degenerate noise. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2017;40(13):4812–4831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams RA. Sobolev space. New York: Academic Press; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Duvaut G, Lions JL. Inéquations en thermoélasticité et magnétohydrodynamique. Arch Rational Mech Anal. 1972;46:241–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00250512
   Google Scholar
• Temam R. Navier–Stokes equations: theory and numerical analysis. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.; 1984. (Studies in mathematics and its applications; vol. 2).
   Google Scholar
• Malliavin P. Stochastic analysis. Berlin: Springer; 1995.
   Google Scholar