Stabilization of the weakly coupled Schrödinger system

References

• Ervedoza S, Puel J-P. Approximate controllability for a system of Schrödinger equations modeling a single trapped ion. Ann Inst H Poincaré Anal Non Linéaire. 2009;26(6):2111–2136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsutsumi M. Nonexistence of global solutions to the Cauchy problem for the damped nonlinear Schrödinger equations. SIAM J Math Anal. 1984;15(2):357–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasiecka I, Triggiani R. Optimal regularity, exact controllability and uniform stabilization of Schrödinger equations with Dirichlet control. Differ Integral Eq. 1992;5(3):521–535.
   Google Scholar
• Lasiecka I, Triggiani R, Zhang X. Global uniqueness, observability and stabilization of nonconservative Schrödinger equations via pointwise Carleman estimates, Part I: H1(Ω)-estimates. J Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 2004;12(1):43–123.
   Google Scholar
• Lasiecka I, Triggiani R, Zhang X. Global uniqueness, observability and stabilization of nonconservative Schrödinger equations via pointwise Carleman estimates, Part II: L2(Ω)-estimates. J Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 2004;12(2):183–231.
   Google Scholar
• Machtyngier E, Zuazua E. Stabilization of the Schrödinger equation. Portugal Math. 1994;51(2):243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Alabau F. Indirect boundary stabilization of weakly coupled hyperbolic systems. SIAM J Control Optim. 2002;41(2):511–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamchi I. Polynomial decay for coupled Schrödinger equations with variable coefficients and damped by one Dirichlet boundary feedback. Bull Belg Math Soc Simon Stevin. 2010;17:593–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamchi I, Rebiai SE. Indirect boundary stabilization of a system of Schrödinger equations with variable coefficients. Nonlinear Differ Eq Appl. 2008;15(4):639–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornilleau P, Robbiano L. Carleman estimates for the Zaremba boundary condition and stabilization of waves. Am J Math. 2014;136(2):393–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu X. Sharp decay rates for the weakly coupled hyperbolic system with one internal damping. SIAM J Control Optim. 2012;50(3):1643–1660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebeau G, Robbiano L. Stabilisation de l'équation des ondes par le bord. Duke Math J. 1997;86(3):465–491.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalcanti MM, Corrêa WJ, Özsari T, Sepúlveda M, Véjar-asem R. Exponential stability for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with locally distributed damping. arXiv: 1910.00921, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantarov VK, Özsari T. Qualitative properties of solutions for nonlinear Schrödi-nger equations with nonlinear boundary conditions on the half-line. J Math Phys. 2016;57(2):021511.
   Google Scholar
• Özsari T. Weakly-damped focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equations with Dirichlet control. J Math Anal Appl. 2012;389(1):84–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özsari T. Global existence and open loop exponential stabilization of weak solutions for nonlinear Schrödinger equations with localized external Neumann manipulation. Nonlinear Anal. 2013;80:179–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özsari T, Kalantarov VK, Lasiecka I. Uniform decay rates for the energy of weakly damped defocusing semilinear Schrödinger equations with inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary control. J Differ Eq. 2011;251(7):1841–1863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsutsumi M. On global solutions to the initial boundary value problem for the damped nonlinear Schrödinger equations. J Math Anal Appl. 1990;145(2):328–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasiecka I, Triggiani R. Well-posedness and sharp uniform decay rates at the L2(Ω)-level of the Schrödinger equation with nonlinear boundary dissipation. J Evol Eq. 2006;6(3):485–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosier L, Zhang B-Y. Local exact controllability and stabilizability of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on a bounded interval. SIAM J Control Optim. 2009;48(2):972–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackleh A, Deng K. On critical exponent for the Schrodinger equation with a nonlinear boundary condition. Differ Integral Eq. 2004;17(11–12):1293–1307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Its A, Shepelsky D. Initial boundary value problem for the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with Robin boundary condition: half-line approach. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2013;469(2149):20120199, 14 p.
   Google Scholar
• Avalos G, Bucci F. Rational rates of uniform decay for strong solutions to a fluid-structure PDE system. J Differ Eq. 2015;258(12):4398–4423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avalos G, Lasiecka I, Triggiani R. Heat–wave interaction in 2–3 dimensions: optimal rational decay rate. J Math Anal Appl. 2016;437(2):782–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu X. Stabilization of hyperbolic equations with mixed boundary conditions. Math Control Relat Fields. 2015;5(4):761–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Rao B. Frequency domain approach for the polynomial stability of a system of partially damped wave equations. J Math Anal Appl. 2007;335(2):860–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty CJK, Duyckaerts T. Non-uniform stability for bounded semi-groups on Banach spaces. J Evol Eq. 2008;8(4):765–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alabau F, Lautaud M. Indirect stabilization of locally coupled wave-type systems. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var. 2012;18(2):548–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burq N, Zuily C. Concentration of Laplace eigenfunctions and stabilization of weakly damped wave equation. Comm Math Phys. 2016;345(3):1055–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fursikov AV, Imanuvilov OV. Controllability of evolution equations. Seoul: Research Institute of Mathematics, Seoul National University; 1994. (Lecture notes series; 34).
   Google Scholar