Uniform boundary observability of Finite Difference approximations of non-compactly coupled piezoelectric beam equations

References

• Dagdeviren C, et al. Recent progress in flexible and stretchable piezoelectric devices for mechanical energy harvesting, sensing and actuation. Extreme Mech Lett. 2016;9(1):269–281.
   Google Scholar
• Erturk A. Assumed-modes modeling of piezoelectric energy harvesters: euler-bernoulli, rayleigh, and timoshenko models with axial deformations. Comput Struct. 2012;106/107:214–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ru C, Liu X, Sun Y. Nanopositioning technologies: Fundamentals and Applications. Berlin: Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Shome SK, Datta U, Mukherjee A, et al. Piezoelectric actuation and motors: an overview of nonlinearities, control and emerging industrial applications. 2018 3rd International Innovative Applications of Computational Intelligence on Power, Energy and Controls with their Impact on Humanity (CIPECH). 2018; 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Morris KA, Özer AÖ. Modeling and stabilizability of voltage-actuated piezo-electric beams with magnetic effects. SIAM J Control Optim. 2014;52(4):2371–2398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen S. Analysis of a plate with a localized piezoelectric patch. Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control1998;2952-2957..
   Google Scholar
• Lasiecka I, Miara B. Exact controllability of a 3d piezoelectric body. C R Math. 2009;347:167–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RC. Smart material systems: Model Development. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Yang J. Special topics in the theory of piezoelectricity. New York: Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang CL, Chen WQ, Li JY, et al. One-dimensional equations for piezoelectro-magnetic beams and magnetoelectric effects in fibers. Smart Mater Struct. 2009;18:095026.
   Google Scholar
• Yang G, Du J, Wang J, et al. Frequency dependence of electromagnetic radiation from a finite vibrating piezoelectric body. Mech Res Commun. 2018;93:163–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özer AÖ. Further stabilization and exact observability results for voltage-actuated piezoelectric beams with magnetic effects. Math Control, Signals, Syst. 2015;27(2):219–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özer AÖ. Modeling and controlling an active constrained layered (ACL) beam actuated by two voltage sources with/without magnetic effects. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 2017;62(12):6445–6450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özer AÖ. Potential formulation for charge or current-controlled piezoelectric smart composites and stabilization results: electrostatic vs. quasi-static vs. fully-dynamic approaches. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 2018;64(3):989–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özer AÖ. Dynamic and electrostatic modeling for a piezoelectric smart composite and related stabilization results. Evol Equ Control The. 2018;7(4):639–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos AJA, et al. Equivalence between exponential stabilization and boundary observability for piezoelectric beams with magnetic effect. Z Angew Math Phys. 2019;70:60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks HT, Ito K, Wang B. Exponentially stable approximations of weakly damped wave equations. Int Ser Numer Math. 1991;100:1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Infante JA, Zuazua E. Boundary observability for the space semi-discretizations of the 1-D wave equation. Math. Model. Num. Ann.. 1999;33:407–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negreanu M, Zuazua E. Discrete ingham inequalities and applications. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2006;44(1):412–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebou LT, Zuazua E. Uniform boundary stabilization of the finite difference space discretization of the 1-d wave equation. Adv Comput Math. 2007;26:337–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugariu IF, Micu S, Roventa I. Approximation of the controls for the beam equation with vanishing viscosity. Math. Comput.. 2016;85(301):2259–2303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon L, Zuazua E. Boundary controllability of the finite-difference space semi-discretizations of the beam equation. ESAIM Control Opt Calc Var. 2002;8:827–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özer AÖ. Uniform exponential stabilization of semi-discrete finite difference approximations of a Rayleigh beam equation with only one boundary feedback control.IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).2019;7708-7713.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida Junior DS, Ramos AJA, Santos ML. Observability inequality for the finite-difference semi-discretization of the 1–d coupled wave equations. Adv Comput Math. 2015;41:105–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komornik V. Exact controllability and stabilization. The Multiplier Method, RAM. Paris: Masson-John Wiley; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Komornik V, Loreti P. Fourier series in control theory. New York: Springer; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Boujaoui HEl, Bouslous H, Maniar L. Boundary stabilization for 1-D semi-discrete wave equation by filtering technique. Bull TICMI. 2013;17:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida DS, Ramos AJA, Santos ML. Ingham type approach for uniform observability inequality of the semi-discrete coupled wave equations. Electronic Journal of Differential Equations. 2020;2020(127):1–28.
   Google Scholar