Numerical valuation of European and American options under Merton's model

References

• Black F, Scholes M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ. 1973;81:637–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Ross SA. The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. J Financ Econ. 1976;3:145–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton RC. Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. J Financ Econ. 1976;3:125–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou SG. A jump-diffusion model for option pricing. Manage Sci. 2002;48:1086–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull J, White A. The pricing of options on assets with stochastic volatilities. J Finance. 1987;42:281–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein EM, Stein JC. Stock price distributions with stochastic volatility: an analytic approach. Rev Financ Stud. 1991;4:727–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heston SL. A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Rev Financ Stud. 1993;6:327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin KI. Jump diffusion option valuation in discrete time. J Finance. 1993;48:1833–1863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cont R, Voltchkova E. A finite difference scheme for option pricing in jump-diffusion and exponential lévy models. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2005;43:1596–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d'Halluin Y, Forsyth PA, Vetzal KR. Robust numerical methods for contingent claims under jump diffusion processes. IMA J Numer Anal. 2005;25:87–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavella D, Randall C. Pricing financial instruments: the finite difference method. Chichester: Wiley; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson K, Johnson C, Thomée V. Time discretization of parabolic problems by the discontinuous Galerkin method. RAIRO Modél Math Anal Numér. 1985;19:611–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makridakis CG, Babuska I. On the stability of the discontinuous Galerkin method for the heat equation. SIAM J Numer Anal. 1997;34:389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn B, Shu CW. The local discontinuous Galerkin method for time-dependent convection-diffusion systems. SIAM J Numer Anal. 1998;35:2440–2463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn B, Karniadakis GE, Shu CW. Discontinuous Galerkin methods: theory, computation and applications. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering. New York: Springer; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn B, Shu CW. Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods for convection-dominated problems. J Sci Comput. 2001;16:173–261.
   Google Scholar
• Werder T, Gerdes K, Schötzau D, et al. hp-discontinuous Galerkin time-stepping for parabolic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2001;190:6685–6708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matache AM, Schwab C, Wihler TP. Fast numerial solution of parabolic integro-differential equations with applications in finance. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2005;27:369–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang WS, Chen YZ. Fast numerical valuation of options with jump under Merton's model. Comput Appl Math. 2017;318:79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hozman J, Tichý T, Vlasák M. DG method for pricing European options under Merton jump-diffusion model. Appl Math. 2019;64:501–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr P, Mayo A. On the numerical evaluation of option prices in jump diffusion processes. Eur J Finance. 2007;13:353–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee ST, Sun HW. Fourth-order compact scheme with local mesh refinement for option pricing in jump-diffusion model. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ. 2012;28:1079–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilloo MJ, Tangman DY. A high-order finite difference method for option valuation. Compu Math Appl. 2017;74:652–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel KS, Mehra M. Fourth order compact scheme for option pricing under Merton and Kou jump-diffusion models. Int J Theor Appl Finance. 2018;21:16–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr P, Madan DB. Option valuation using the fast Fourier transform. Rev Financ Stud. 1998;2:61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Fang F, Oosterlee CW. A novel pricing method for European options based on Fourier-cosine series expansions. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2008;31:826–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord R, Fang F, Bervoets F, et al. A fast and accurate FFT-based method for pricing early-exercise options under Lévy processes. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2008;30:1678–1705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivanen J. Numerical valuation of European and American options under Kou's jump-diffusion model. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2008;30:1949–1970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan XT, Yang Y, Zhang K. A robust numerical method for pricing American options under Kou's jump-diffusion models based on penalty method. J Appl Math Comput.. 2020;62:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghi M, Mollapourasl R, Vanmaele M. An RBF-FD method for pricing American options under jump-diffusion models. Comput Math Appl. 2018;76:2434–2459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YZ, Wang WS, Xiao AG. An efficient algorithm for options under Merton's jump-diffusion model on nonuniform grids. Comput Econ. 2019;53:1565–1591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel KS, Mehra M. Fourth-order compact finite difference scheme for American option pricing under regime-switching jump-diffusion models. Int J Appl Comput Math. 2017;3:547–567.
   Google Scholar
• d'Halluin Y, Forsyth PA, Labahn G. A penalty method for American options with jump diffusion processes. Numer Math. 2004;97:321–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundsdorfer W, Verwer JG. Numerical solution of time-dependent advection-diffusion-reaction equations. New York: Springer; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lele SK. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J Comput Phys. 1992;103:16–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss HO, Thomee V, Widlund O. Smoothing of initial data and rates of convergence for parabolic difference equations. Commun Pure Appl Math. 1970;23:241–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar