Analysis of the transmission eigenvalue problem with two conductivity parameters

References

• Cakoni F, Colton D, Haddar H. On the determination of Dirichlet or transmission eigenvalues from far field data. C R Acad Sci Paris Ser I. 2010;348:379–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris I. Non-destructive testing of anisotropic materials [Ph.D. Thesis]. University of Delaware; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Audibert L, Chesnel L, Haddar H. Transmission eigenvalues with artificial background for explicit material index identification. C R Acad Sci Paris Ser. 2018;356(6):626–631.
   Google Scholar
• Cakoni F, Colton D, Haddar H. The interior transmission problem for regions with cavities. SIAM J Math Anal. 2010;42:145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossonnière A, Haddar H. The electromagnetic interior transmission problem for regions with cavities. SIAM J Math Anal. 2011;43:1698–1715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris I, Cakoni F, Sun J. Transmission eigenvalues and non-destructive testing of anisotropic magnetic materials with voids. Inverse Probl. 2014;30:035016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris I, Kleefeld A. Analysis and computation of the transmission eigenvalues with a conductive boundary condition. Appl Anal. 2022;101(6):1880–1895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H. On local and global structures of transmission eigenfunctions and beyond. J Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 2022;30(2):287–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An J. A Legendre-Galerkin spectral approximation and estimation of the index of refraction for transmission eigenvalues. Appl Numer Math. 2016;108:171–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An J, Shen J. Spectral approximation to a transmission eigenvalue problem and its applications to an inverse problem. Comput Math Appl. 2015;69(10):1132–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakoni F, Monk P, Sun J. Error analysis of the finite element approximation of transmission eigenvalues. Comput Methods Appl Math. 2014;14:419–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton D, Monk P, Sun J J. Analytical and computational methods for transmission eigenvalues. Inverse Probl. 2010;26:045011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gintides D, Pallikarakis N. A computational method for the inverse transmission eigenvalue problem. Inverse Probl. 2013;29:104010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleefeld A. A numerical method to compute interior transmission eigenvalues. Inverse Probl. 2013;29(10):104012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleefeld A, Pieronek L. The method of fundamental solutions for computing acoustic interior transmission eigenvalues. Inverse Probl. 2018;34(3):035007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Zhou A. Finite element methods for eigenvalue problems. 1st ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC Publications; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bondarenko O, Liu X. The factorization method for inverse obstacle scattering with conductive boundary condition. Inverse Problems. 2013;29:095021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondarenko O, Harris I, Kleefeld A. The interior transmission eigenvalue problem for an inhomogeneous media with a conductive boundary. Appl Anal. 2017;96(1):2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diao H, Cao X, Liu H. On the geometric structures of transmission eigenfunctions with a conductive boundary condition and applications. Commun Partial Differ Equ. 2021;46(4):630–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris I, Kleefeld A. The inverse scattering problem for a conductive boundary condition and transmission eigenvalues. Appl Anal. 2020;99(3):508–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris I. Analysis of two transmission eigenvalue problems with a coated boundary condition. Appl Anal. 2021;100(9):1996–2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Y. Electromagnetic interior transmission eigenvalue problem for an inhomogeneous medium with a conductive boundary. Commun Pure Appl Anal. 2020;19(3):1387–1397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmucker U. Interpretation of induction anomalies above nonuniform surface layers. Geophysics. 1971;36:156–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakoni F, Colton D. A qualitative approach to inverse scattering theory. Berlin: Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cakoni F, Colton D, Haddar H. Inverse scattering theory and transmission eigenvalues. Philadelphia (PA): SIAM; 2016. (CBMS Series; 88).
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch A, Grinberg N. The factorization method for inverse problems. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bramble J. A proof of the inf-sup condition for the Stokes equations on Lipschitz domains. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2003;13(3):361–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salsa S. Partial differential equations in action from modelling to theory. Milano: Springer Italia; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Evans L. Partial differential equation. 2nd ed. Providence (RI): AMS; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cakoni F, Kirsch A. On the interior transmission eigenvalue problem. Int J Comput Sci Math. 2010;3:142–167.
   Google Scholar
• Axler S. Linear algebra done right. 3rd ed. New York: Springer (NY); 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cakoni F, Kress R. A boundary integral equation method for the transmission eigenvalue problem. Appl Anal. 2017;96(1):23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleefeld A. The hot spots conjecture can be false: some numerical examples. Adv Comput Math. 2021;47(6):85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyn W-J. An integral method for solving nonlinear eigenvalue problems. Linear Algebra Appl. 2012;436:3839–3863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar