Refined criteria toward boundedness in an attraction–repulsion chemotaxis system with nonlinear productions

References

• Keller EF, Segel LA. Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. J Theoret Biol. 1970;26(3):399–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller EF, Segel LA. Model for chemotaxis. J Theoret Biol. 1971;30(2):225–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller EF, Segel LA. Traveling bands of chemotactic bacteria: a theoretical analysis. J Theoret Biol. 1971;30(2):235–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osaki K, Yagi A. Finite dimensional attractor for one-dimensional Keller–Segel equations. Funkcial Ekvacioj. 2001;44(3):441–470.
   Google Scholar
• Herrero MA, Velázquez JJL. A blow-up mechanism for a chemotaxis model. Ann Scuola Norm Sup Pisa Cl Sci (4). 1997;24(4):633–683.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger W, Luckhaus S. On explosions of solutions to a system of partial differential equations modelling chemotaxis. Trans Amer Math Soc. 1992;329(2):819–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagai T. Blowup of nonradial solutions to parabolic–elliptic systems modeling chemotaxis in two-dimensional domains. J Inequal Appl. 2001;6(1):37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler M. Aggregation vs. global diffusive behavior in the higher-dimensional Keller–Segel model. J Differ Equ. 2010;248(12):2889–2905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D-M, Tao Y-S. Boundedness in a chemotaxis system with nonlinear signal production. Appl Math J Chinese Univ Ser B. 2016;31(4):379–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler M. A critical blow-up exponent in a chemotaxis system with nonlinear signal production. Nonlinearity. 2018;31(5):2031–2056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock MS. An initial value problem from semiconductor device theory. SIAM J Math Anal. 1974;5:597–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock MS. Asymptotic behavior of solutions of transport equations for semiconductor devices. J Math Anal Appl. 1975;49:215–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Q, Jiang Z, Zheng S. Critical mass for an attraction–repulsion chemotaxis system. Appl Anal. 2018;97(13):2349–2354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Li Y. Blow-up of nonradial solutions to attraction–repulsion chemotaxis system in two dimensions. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2016;30:170–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao Y, Wang Z-A. Competing effects of attraction vs. repulsion in chemotaxis. Math Model Method Appl Sci. 2013;23(1):1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglialoro G. Explicit lower bound of blow-up time for an attraction–repulsion chemotaxis system. J Math Anal App. 2019;479(1):1069–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Guo Q, Zheng S. Finite time blow-up of nonradial solutions in an attraction–repulsion chemotaxis system. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2017;34:335–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglialoro G. Influence of nonlinear production on the global solvability of an attraction–repulsion chemotaxis system. Math Nachr. 2021;294(12):2441–2454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca M, Chavez-Ross A, Edelstein-Keshet L, et al. Chemotactic signaling, microglia, and Alzheimer's disease senile plaques: is there a connection? Bull Math Biol. 2003;65(4):693–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankeit J. Finite-time blow-up in the three-dimensional fully parabolic attraction-dominated attraction–repulsion chemotaxis system. J Math Anal Appl. 2021;504(2):Paper No. 125409, 16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Li Y. Finite-time blowup in attraction–repulsion systems with nonlinear signal production. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl. 2021;61:Paper No. 103305, 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiyo Y, Marras M, Tanaka Y, et al. Blow-up phenomena in a parabolic–elliptic–elliptic attraction-repulsion chemotaxis system with superlinear logistic degradation. Nonlinear Anal. 2021;212:Paper No. 112550, 14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong L, Tian M, Zheng S. An attraction-repulsion chemotaxis system with nonlinear productions. J Math Anal Appl. 2020;484(1):Article ID 123703, 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Li Z, Zhao J. Asymptotic behavior in an attraction-repulsion chemotaxis system with nonlinear productions. J Math Anal Appl. 2022;507(1):Paper No. 125763, 24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren G, Liu B. Boundedness and stabilization in the 3D minimal attraction–repulsion chemotaxis model with logistic source. Z Angew Math Phys. 2022;73(2):Paper No. 58, 25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren G, Liu B. Global boundedness and asymptotic behavior in a quasilinear attraction–repulsion chemotaxis model with nonlinear signal production and logistic-type source. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2020;30(13):2619–2689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao Y, Winkler M. Boundedness in a quasilinear parabolic-parabolic Keller–Segel system with subcritical sensitivity. J. Differ Equ. 2012;252(1):692–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezis H. Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial differential equations. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Horstmann D, Winkler M. Boundedness vs. blow-up in a chemotaxis system. J Differ Equ. 2005;215(1):52–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladyženskaja OA, Solonnikov VA, Ural'ceva NN. Linear and quasi-linear equations of parabolic type. American Mathematical Society; 1988. (Translations of mathematical monographs; vol. 23).
   Google Scholar
• Marras M, Viglialoro G. Boundedness in a fully parabolic chemotaxis-consumption system with nonlinear diffusion and sensitivity, and logistic source. Math Nachr. 2018;291(14-15):2318–2333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson GJO. Some inequalities for (a+b)p and (a+b)p+(a−b)p. Math Gaz. 2014;98(541):96–103.
   Google Scholar
• Frassu S, Viglialoro G. Boundedness for a fully parabolic Keller–Segel model with sublinear segregation and superlinear aggregation. Acta Appl Math. 2021;171:Paper No. 19, 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler M. How far can chemotactic cross-diffusion enforce exceeding carrying capacities? J Nonlinear Sci. 2014;24(5):809–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nirenberg L. On elliptic partial differential equations. Ann Scuola Norm Sup Pisa Cl Sci (3). 1959;2(13):115–162.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht F. New development in FreeFem++. J Numer Math. 2012;20(3-4):251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar