The effect of disability on labour market outcomes in Germany

References

• Aakvik, A, 2003. Estimating the employment effects of education for disabled workers in Norway, Empirical Economics 28 (2003), pp. 515–34.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D, and Angrist, JD, 2001. Consequence of employment protection? The case of the Americans with disability act, Journal of Political Economy 109 (2001), pp. 915–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, M, and Braun, H, 1998. International research project on job retention and return to work strategies for disabled workers. 1998, Study Report: Germany (Ed.) International Labour Organization, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J, Kapteyn, A, Smith, JP, and Van Soest, A, 2004. International comparisons of work disability. IZA Working Paper Series, No. 1118. Bonn, Germany. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D, and Heitmueller, A, 2005. The Disability Discrimination Act in the UK: helping or hindering employment amongst the disabled?. IZA Working Paper Series, No. 1476. Bonn, Germany. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Contoyannis, P, and Rice, N, 2001. The impact of health on wages: evidence from the British household panel study, Empirical Economics 26 (2001), pp. 599–622.
   Google Scholar
• 2000. Culyer, AJ, and Newhouse, JP, eds. Handbook of Health Economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 2000. pp. 995–1051, Chap. 18.
   Google Scholar
• Dupre, D, and Karjalainen, A, 2003. Employment of disabled people in Europe in 2002, statistics in focus on population and social conditions, Eurostat Communications (2003), ISSN 1024-4352.
   Google Scholar
• Haveman, R, and Wolfe, B, 2000. "The economics of disability and disability policy". In: Culyer, AJ, and Newhouse, JP, eds. Handbook of Health Economics, Chap. 18. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000. pp. 995–1051.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, JJ, Lalonde, RJ, and Smith, JA, 1999. "The economics and econometrics of active labour market policies". In: Ashenfelter, O, and Card, D, eds. Handbook of Labour Economics. Vol. 3A. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1999. pp. 1865–2097.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J, 1999. "The bootstrap". In: Heckman, JJ, and Leamer, EE, eds. Handbook of Econometrics. Vol. 5. North Holland, Amsterdam. 1999. pp. 3159–227, Chap. 52.
   Google Scholar
• Hotchkiss, J, 2004. A closer look at the employment impact of the Americans with disabilities act, The Journal of Human Resources 39 (2004), pp. 887–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, GW, 2004. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review, Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (2004), pp. 4–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolls, C, and Prescott, JJ, 2004. Disaggregating employment protection: the case of disability discrimination. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 10740. Cambridge: NBER; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M, Lattreille, PL, and Sloane, PJ, 2003. Disability, gender and the labour market. IZA Working Papers Series, No. 936. Bonn, Germany. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, M, Sloane, P, and Ferko, I, 2000. Disability and labour market: an analysis of British males, Journal of Health Economics 19 (2000), pp. 961–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, M, 2001. "Identification and estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption". In: Lechner, M, and Pfeiffer, F, eds. Econometric Evaluation of Active Labour Market Policies. Heidelberg: Physica; 2001. pp. 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lechner, M, 2002. Programme heterogeneity and propensity score matching: an application to the evaluation of active labour market policies, Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (2002), pp. 205–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, M, 2008. A note on endogenous control variables in evaluation studies, Statistics and Probability Letters 78 (2008), pp. 190–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyman, J, 1923. On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essays on principles, Section 9, translated in Social Science 5 (1923), pp. 465–80.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, PR, 1984. The consequences of adjustment for a concominat variable that has been affected by the treatment, The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 147 (1984), pp. 656–66.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P, and Rubin, D, 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika 70 (1983), pp. 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, AD, 1951. Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings, Oxford Economic Papers 3 (1951), pp. 135–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D, 1974. Estimating casual effects of treatments in randomised and non-randomised studies, Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (1974), pp. 688–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapolsky, R, 2005. Sick on poverty, Scientific American 293 (2005), pp. 92–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sianesi, B, 2004. An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labour market programmes in the 1990s, Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (2004), pp. 133–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, BW, 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Cambridge: Chapman and Hall; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Verick, S, 2004. Do financial incentives promote the employment of the disabled?. IZA Working Paper Series, No. 1256. Bonn, Germany. 2004.
   Google Scholar