References
- Altig, D, Christiano, L, Eichenbaum, M, and Linde, J, 2005. "Firm-specific capital, nominal rigidities and the business cycle". NBER Working Paper No. w11034. 2005.
- Basu, S, Fernald, J, and Kimball, M, 2004. "Are technology improvements contractionary?". NBER Working Paper No. 10592. 2004.
- Caner, M, and Kilian, L, 2001. Size distortions of tests of the null hypothesis of stationarity: evidence and implications for the PPP debate, Journal of International Money and Finance 20 (2001), pp. 639–57.
- Christiano, L, Eichenbaum, M, and Evans, C, 1999. "Monetary policy shocks: what have we learned, and to what end?". In: Taylor, J, and Woodford, M, eds. Handbook of Macroeconomics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999. pp. 65–148.
- Christiano, L, Eichenbaum, M, and Evans, C, 2005. Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy, Journal of Political Economy 113 (2005), pp. 1–45.
- Christiano, L, Eichenbaum, M, and Vigfusson, R, 2004. The response of hours to a technology shock: evidence based on direct measures of technology, Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (2004), pp. 381–95.
- Coenen, G, McAdam, P, and Straub, R, 2008. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32 (2008), pp. 2543–83.
- Erceg, C, Guerrieri, L, and Gust, C, 2005. Can long-run restrictions identify technology shocks?, Journal of the European Economic Association 3 (2005), pp. 1237–78.
- Fagan, G, Henry, J, and Mestre, R, 2001. "An area wide (AWM) model for the euro area". Working Paper No. 42. European Central Bank; 2001.
- Fernald, JG, 2007. Trend breaks, long-run restrictions, and contractionary technology improvements, Journal of Monetary Economics 54 (2007), pp. 2467–85.
- Francis, N, and Ramey, VA, 2005. Is the technology-driven real business cycle hypothesis dead? Shocks and aggregate fluctuations revisited, Journal of Monetary Economics 52 (2005), pp. 1379–99.
- Friedman, M, 1961. The lag in effect of monetary policy, Journal of Political Economy 69 (1961), pp. 447–66.
- Galí, J, 1999. Technology, employment, and the business cycle: do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations?, American Economic Review 89 (1999), pp. 249–71.
- Galí, J, 2004. On the role of technology shocks as a source of business cycles: some new evidence, Journal of the European Economic Association (Papers and Proceedings) 2 (2004), pp. 372–80.
- Kwiatkowski, D, Phillips, P, Schmidt, P, and Shin, Y, 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root, Journal of Econometrics 54 (1992), pp. 159–78.
- Peersman, G, and Smets, F, 2003. "The monetary transmission mechanism in the euro area: more evidence from VAR analysis". In: Angeloni, I, Kashyap, A, Mojon, B, and Terlizzese, D, eds. Monetary Policy Transmission in the Euro Area. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. pp. 36–55.
- Peersman, G, and Straub, R, 2004. Technology shocks and robust sign restrictions in a euro area SVAR. Working Paper No. 373. European Central Bank; 2004.
- Shapiro, M, and Watson, M, 1988. Sources of business cycle fluctuations, NBER Macroeconomics Annual 3 (1988), pp. 111–56.
- Smets, F, and Wouters, R, 2003. An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibtium model of the euro area, Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (2003), pp. 1123–75.
- Uhlig, H, 2004. Do technology shocks lead to a fall in total hours worked?, Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (2004), pp. 361–71.
- Zivot, E, and Andrews, DWK, 1992. Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10 (1992), pp. 251–70.