A mixed approach to payment certainty calibration in discrete choice welfare estimation

References

• Ajzen , I , Brown , TC and Carvajal , F . 2004 . Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: the case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 30 : 1108 – 21 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akter , S , Brouwer , R , Brander , L and van Beukering , P . 2009 . Respondent uncertainty in a contingent market for carbon offsets . Ecological Economics , 68 : 1858 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberini , A , Boyle , K and Welsh , M . 2003 . Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 45 : 40 – 62 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely , D , Loewenstein , G and Prelec , D . 2003 . ‘Coherent arbitrariness’: stable demand curves without stable preferences . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 118 : 73 – 105 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow , K , Solow , R , Portney , PR , Leamer , EE , Radner , R and Schuman , H . 1993 . Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation . Federal Register , 58 : 4601 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva , ME and Swait , JD . 1986 . The Akaike likelihood ratio index . Transportation Science , 20 : 133 – 6 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenschein , K , Blomquist , GC , Johannesson , M , Horn , N and Freeman , P . 2008 . Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: evidence from a field experiment . The Economic Journal , 118 : 114 – 37 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron , TA and James , MD . 1987 . Efficient estimation methods for closed-ended contingent valuation survey data . Review of Economics and Statistics , 69 : 269 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ , PA and Bishop , RC . 2001 . Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: an empirical study of hypothetical bias . Environmental and Resource Economics , 19 : 383 – 402 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ , PA , Bishop , RC , Brown , TC and McCollum , DW . 1997 . Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 33 : 151 – 62 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang , J-I , Yoo , S-H and Kwak , S-J . 2007 . An investigation of preference uncertainty in the contingent valuation study . Applied Economics Letters , 14 : 691 – 5 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene , WA . 2003 . Econometric Analysis , New Jersey : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Hausman , JA and Wise , DA . 1978 . A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogenous preferences . Econometrica , 46 : 403 – 26 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeffler , S and Ariely , D . 1999 . Constructing stable preferences: a look into dimensions of experience and their impact on preference stability . Journal of Consumer Psychology , 8 : 113 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Johannesson , M , Liljas , B and Johansson , P-O . 1998 . An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions . Applied Economics , 30 : 643 – 7 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li , C-Z and Mattsson , L . 1995 . Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: an improved structural model for contingent valuation . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 28 : 256 – 69 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List , JA . 2003 . Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 118 : 41 – 71 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List , JA and Gallet , CA . 2001 . What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? . Environmental and Resource Economics , 20 : 241 – 54 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis , J and Ekstrand , E . 1998 . Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: the case of the Mexican spotted owl . Ecological Economics , 27 : 29 – 41 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff , J and Liebe , U . 2006 . Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: explaining their motivation . Ecological Economics , 57 : 583 – 94 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poe , G , Clark , J , Rondeau , D and Schulze , W . 2002 . Provision point mechanisms and field validity tests of contingent valuation . Environmental and Resource Economics , 23 : 105 – 31 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ready , RC , Whitehead , JC and Blomquist , GC . 1995 . Contingent valuation when respondents are ambivalent . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 29 : 181 – 96 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samnaliev , M , Stevens , TH and More , T . 2006 . A comparison of alternative certainty calibration techniques in contingent valuation . Ecological Economics , 57 : 507 – 19 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaldit (2006) Scaldit report. Transnational analysis of the state of the aquatic environment of the international Scheldt river basin district: pilot project for testing the European guidance documents, Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij, Erembodegmem, Belgium. Available at http://www.scaldit.org (accessed 8 June 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Schkade , DA and Payne , JW . 1994 . How people respond to contingent valuation questions: a verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 26 : 88 – 109 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaikh , SL , Sun , L and van Kooten , GC . 2007 . Treating respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: a comparison of empirical treatments . Ecological Economics , 62 : 115 – 25 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train , K . 2003 . Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , Cambridge, MA : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Veisten , K and Navrud , S . 2006 . Contingent valuation and actual payment for voluntarily provided passive-use values: assessing the effect of an induced truth-telling mechanism and elicitation formats . Applied Economics , 38 : 735 – 56 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossler , CA , Ethier , RG , Poe , GL and Welsh , MP . 2003 . Payment certainty in discrete choice valuation responses: results from a field validity test . Southern Economic Journal , 69 : 886 – 902 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , H . 1997 . Treatment of don’t know responses in contingent valuation surveys: a random valuation model . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 32 : 219 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh , MP and Poe , GL . 1998 . Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 36 : 170 – 85 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar