Industry-specific effects of antidumping activities: evidence from the US, the European Union and China

References

• Arellano , M and Bond , S . 1991 . Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations . Review of Economic Studies , 58 : 277 – 97 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano , M and Bover , O . 1995 . Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models . Journal of Econometrics , 68 : 29 – 52 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell , R and Bond , S . 1998 . Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models . Journal of Econometrics , 87 : 115 – 43 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bown , CP . 2009 . Protectionism increases and spreads: global use of trade remedies rises by 18.8% in first quarter 2009 Manuscript, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA
   Google Scholar
• Bown, C. P. (2010) Global Antidumping Database. Available at http://econ.worldbank.org/ttbd/gad/ (accessed 25 March 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Brambilla, I., Porto, G. and Tarozzi, A. (2008) Adjusting to trade policy: evidence from US antidumping duties on Vietnamese catfish, NBER Working Paper No. 14495, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Brenton , P . 2001 . Antidumping policies in the EU and trade diversion . European Journal of Political Economy , 17 : 593 – 607 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , L . 2009 . Ten years of anti-dumping in the EU: economic and political targeting ECIPE Working Paper No. 02/2009, European Center for International Political Economy, Brussels
   Google Scholar
• Egger , P and Nelson , D . 2007 . How bad is antidumping?: evidence from panel data Research Paper Series No. 2007/17, Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalization and Economic Policy
   Google Scholar
• Evans , CL and Sherlund , SM . 2006 . Are antidumping duties for sale? Case-level evidence on the Grossman-Helpman protection for sale model International Finance Discussion Papers No. 888, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
   Google Scholar
• Finger , JM , Hall , HK and Nelson , D . 1982 . The political economy of administered protection . American Economic Review , 72 : 452 – 66 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguli , B . 2008 . The trade effects of Indian antidumping actions . Review of International Economics , 16 : 930 – 41 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen , WL . 1990 . The international trade commission and the politics of protectionism . American Political Science Review , 84 : 21 – 46 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekman , BM and Kostecki , MM . 2001 . The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Holtz-Eakin , D , Newey , W and Rosen , H . 1988 . Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data . Econometrica , 56 : 1371 – 95 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konings , J , Vandenbussche , H and Springael , L . 2001 . Import diversion under European antidumping policy . Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade , 1 : 283 – 99 .
   Google Scholar
• Moore , MO . 1992 . Rules or politics? An empirical analysis of ITC anti-dumping decisions . Economic Inquiry , 30 : 449 – 66 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore , MO and Zanardi , M . 2009 . Does antidumping use contribute to trade liberalization? . Canadian Journal of Economics , 42 : 469 – 95 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park , S . 2009 . The trade depressing and trade diversion effects of antidumping actions: the case of China . China Economic Review , 20 : 542 – 8 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prusa , TJ . 1997 . “ The trade effects of US antidumping actions ” . In Effects of US Trade Protection and Promotion Policies , Edited by: Feenstra , RC . 191 – 214 . Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Prusa , TJ . 2001 . On the spread and impact of anti-dumping . Canadian Journal of Economics , 34 : 591 – 611 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar