Does organizational ownership matter? Objectives of employees in public, nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes

References

• Amirkhanyan, A. A., Kim, H. J. and Lambright, K. T. (2008) Does the public sector outperform the nonprofit and for-profit sectors? Evidence from a national panel study on nursing home quality and access, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 326–53. doi:10.1002/pam.20327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, D. and Hunt, J. D. (2012) Valuing of attributes influencing the attractiveness of suburban train service in Mumbai city: a stated preference approach, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46, 1465–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, D. and Maitra, B. (2010) Stated preference approach for valuation of travel time displayed as traffic information on a VMS board, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136, 214–24. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, B. W. and Connor, P. E. (2005) Self-selection or socialization of public- and private-sector managers? A cross-cultural values analysis, Journal of Business Research, 58, 111–13. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00481-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner, A., Karaca-Mandic, P. and Ren, T. (2012) Ownership and quality in markets with asymmetric information: evidence from nursing homes, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 12, 42. doi:10.1515/1935-1682.3038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner, A., Ren, T. and Paulson, D. F. (2011) A sectoral comparison of wage levels and wage inequality in human services industries, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 608–33. doi:10.1177/0899764010365012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R. (2001) Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 35, 677–93. doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00014-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaauw, D., Erasmus, E., Pagaiya, N. et al. (2010) Policy interventions that attract nurses to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experiment, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 350–56. doi:10.2471/BLT.09.072918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, J. F., Hauber, A. B., Marshall, D. A. et al. (2011) Conjoint analysis applications in health – a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force, Value in Health, 14, 403–13. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brough, P., Johnson, G., Drummond, S. et al. (2011) Comparisons of cognitive ability and job attitudes of older and younger workers, Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion: An International Journal, 30, 105–26. doi:10.1108/02610151111116508
   Google Scholar
• Caers, R., Du Bois, C., Jegers, M. et al. (2009) A micro-economic perspective on manager selection in nonprofit organizations, European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 173–97. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.08.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., Flynn, L. and Aiken, L. H. (2012) Nursing practice environment and registered nurses’ job satisfaction in nursing homes, The Gerontologist, 52, 484–92. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, S.-C., Boldy, D. P. and Lee, A. H. (2003) Factors influencing residents’ satisfaction in residential aged care, The Gerontologist, 43, 459–72. doi:10.1093/geront/43.4.459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, S.-Y. (2002) Asymmetric information, ownership and quality of care: an empirical analysis of nursing homes, Journal of Health Economics, 21, 293–311. doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00123-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. D., Determann, D., Petrou, S. et al. (2014) Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature, PharmacoEconomics, 32, 883–902. doi:10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bekker-Grob, E. W., Ryan, M. and Gerard, K. (2012) Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature, Health Economics, 21, 145–72. doi:10.1002/hec.1697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cooman, R., De Gieter, S., Pepermans, R. et al. (2008) Freshmen in nursing: job motives and work values of a new generation, Journal of Nursing Management, 16, 56–64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2934.2007.00800.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lange, A. H., Taris, T. W., Jansen, P. et al. (2010) On the relationships among work characteristics and learning-related behavior: does age matter?, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 925–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, F. H., Harris-Kojetin, L. D. and Bercovitz, A. (2009) Intrinsic job satisfaction, overall satisfaction, and intention to leave the job among nursing assistants in nursing homes, The Gerontologist, 49, 596–610. doi:10.1093/geront/gnp051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doiron, D., Hall, J., Kenny, P. et al. (2014) Job preferences of students and new graduates in nursing, Applied Economics, 46, 924–39. doi:10.1080/00036846.2013.861584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Bois, C., Caers, R., Jegers, M. et al. (2009) Agency conflicts between board and manager: a discrete choice experiment in Flemish nonprofit schools, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20, 165–83. doi:10.1002/nml.247
   Google Scholar
• Flemish Agency for Care and Health. (2011) Residential Elderly Care. Available at http://www.zorg-en-gezondheid.be/EN (accessed 19 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Folland, S., Goodman, A. C. and Stano, M. (2013) The Economics of Health and Health Care, Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S., Maitra, B. and Das, S. S. (2013) Effect of distributional assumption of random parameters of mixed logit model on willingness-to-pay values, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104, 601–10. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.154
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, D. C., Feng, Z., Hirth, R. et al. (2013) Effect of nursing home ownership on the quality of post-acute care: an instrumental variables approach, Journal of Health Economics, 32, 12–21. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowski, D. C. and Hirth, R. A. (2003) Competitive spillovers across non-profit and for-profit nursing homes, Journal of Health Economics, 22, 1–22. doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00093-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H., Hensher, D. A. and Rose, J. M. (2006) Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 40, 75–92. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2005.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. B. (1980) The role of nonprofit enterprise, The Yale Law Journal, 89, 835–901. doi:10.2307/796089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, C., Woolhandler, S., Mullan, J. et al. (2002) Does investor-ownership of nursing homes compromise the quality of care?, International Journal of Health Services, 32, 315–25. doi:10.2190/EBCN-WECV-C0NT-676R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. and Greene, W. H. (2003) The mixed logit model: the state of practice, Transportation, 30, 133–76. doi:10.1023/A:1022558715350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M. and Greene, W. H. (2005) Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Heponiemi, T., Elovainio, M., Kouvonen, A. et al. (2011) The effects of ownership, staffing level and organisational justice on nurse commitment, involvement, and satisfaction: a questionnaire study, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48, 1551–61. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillmer, M. P., Wodchis, W. P., Gill, S. S. et al. (2005) Nursing home profit status and quality of care: is there any evidence of an association?, Medical Care Research and Review, 62, 139–66. doi:10.1177/1077558704273769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirth, R. A. (1999) Consumer information and competition between nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes, Journal of Health Economics, 18, 219–40. doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00035-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hole, A. R. (2008) Modelling heterogeneity in patients’ preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment, Journal of Health Economics, 27, 1078–94. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J. and Zwerina, K. (1996) The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs, Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 307–17. doi:10.2307/3152127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, K. and Weisbrod, B. A. (2000) The roles of government and nonprofit suppliers in mixed industries, Public Finance Review, 28, 275–308. doi:10.1177/109114210002800401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjær, T. (2005) A review of the discrete choice experiment – with emphasis on its application in health care, Health Economics Papers 1, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.
   Google Scholar
• Kruk, M. E., Johnson, J. C., Gyakobo, M. et al. (2010) Rural practice preferences among medical students in Ghana: a discrete choice experiment, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 333–41. doi:10.2471/BLT.09.072892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhfeld, W. F. (2010) Marketing Research Methods in SAS: Experimental Design, Choice, Conjoint, and Graphical Techniques, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Lancsar, E. and Louviere, J. (2006) Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?, Health Economics, 15, 797–811. doi:10.1002/hec.1104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanfranchi, J., Narcy, M. and Larguem, M. (2010) Shedding new light on intrinsic motivation to work: evidence from a discrete choice experiment, Kyklos, 63, 75–93. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.2010.00461.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J., Street, D., Carson, R. et al. (2002) Dissecting the random component of utility, Marketing Letters, 13, 177–93. doi:10.1023/A:1020258402210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, in Frontiers of Econometrics, Zarembka, P. (Ed), Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, E. and Ryan, M. (2002) Using discrete choice experiments to derive welfare estimates for the provision of elective surgery: implications of discontinuous preferences, Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 367–82. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00081-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miers, M. E., Rickaby, C. E. and Pollard, K. C. (2007) Career choices in health care: is nursing a special case? A content analysis of survey data, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 1196–209. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirvis, P. H. and Hackett, E. J. (1983) Work and work force characteristics in the nonprofit sector, Monthly Labor Review, 106, 3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newhouse, J. P. (1970) Toward a theory of nonprofit institutions: an economic model of a hospital, American Economic Review, 60, 64–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phanikumar, C. V. and Maitra, B. (2007) Willingness-to-pay and preference heterogeneity for rural bus attributes, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133, 62–69. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:1(62)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. A., Maddala, T. and Johnson, F. R. (2002) Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing, Health Services Research, 37, 1681–705. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.01115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed Johnson, F., Lancsar, E., Marshall, D. et al. (2013) Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force, Value in Health, 16, 3–13. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, T. (2013) Sectoral differences in value congruence and job attitudes: the case of nursing home employees, Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 213–24. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1242-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelt, D. and Train, K. (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 647–57. doi:10.1162/003465398557735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockers, P. C., Jaskiewicz, W., Wurts, L. et al. (2012) Preferences for working in rural clinics among trainee health professionals in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment, BMC Health Services Research, 12, 212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. and Bate, A. (2001) Testing the assumptions of rationality, continuity and symmetry when applying discrete choice experiments in health care, Applied Economics Letters, 8, 59–63. doi:10.1080/135048501750041312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. and Farrar, S. (2000) Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care, British Medical Journal, 320, 1530–33. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. and Gerard, K. (2003) Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2, 55–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• San Miguel, F., Ryan, M. and Amaya-Amaya, M. (2005) Irrational stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation, Health Economics, 14, 307–22. doi:10.1002/hec.912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sándor, Z. and Wedel, M. (2002) Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models, Marketing Science, 21, 455–75. doi:10.1287/mksc.21.4.455.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santerre, R. E. and Vernon, J. A. (2007) Ownership form and consumer welfare: evidence from the nursing home industry, Inquiry, 44, 381–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, M. and Gray, B. H. (2006) How nonprofits matter in American medicine, and what to do about it, Health Affairs, 25, W287–W303. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.25.w287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, W. D., Selden, T. M. and Cohen, J. W. (1998) The impact of ownership type on nursing home outcomes, Health Economics, 7, 639–53. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(1998110)7:7<639::AID-HEC373>3.0.CO;2-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. (2000) Halton sequences for mixed logit, Working Paper No. E00-278, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, H. P. and Chang, C. F. (1988) Cost convergence between for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: does competition matter?, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 28, 50–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Puyvelde, S., Caers, R., Du Bois, C. et al. (2013) Agency problems between managers and employees in nonprofit organizations: a discrete choice experiment, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 24, 63–85. doi:10.1002/nml.21081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Puyvelde, S., Caers, R., Du Bois, C. et al. (2014) Managerial objectives and the governance of public and non-profit organizations, Public Management Review, doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.969760
   Google Scholar
• Willems, J. (2014) Antecedents or effects of being a manager in the nonprofit, public, or private sector, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25, 183–89. doi:10.1002/nml.21119
   Google Scholar
• Wittmer, D. (1991) Serving the people or serving for pay: reward preferences among government, hybrid sector, and business managers, Public Productivity & Management Review, 14, 369–83. doi:10.2307/3380953
   Google Scholar