Linearized Hamiltonian of the LIBOR market model: analytical and empirical results

References

• Andersen, L., and J. Andreasen. 2000. “Volatility Skews and Extensions of the Libor Market Model.” Applied Mathematical Finance 7 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1080/135048600450275.
   Google Scholar
• Baaquie, B. E. 2009a. Interest Rates and Coupon Bonds in Quantum Finance. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baaquie, B. E. 2009b. “Interest Rates in Quantum Finance: The Wilson Expansion and Hamiltonian.” Physical Review E 80 (4): 046119. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046119.
   Google Scholar
• Baaquie, B. E., Y. Cao, A. Lau, and P. Tang. 2012. “Path Integral for Equities: Dynamic Correlation and Empirical Analysis.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 391 (4): 1408–1427. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.09.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baaquie, B. E., and P. Tang. 2012. “Simulation of Nonlinear Interest Rates in Quantum Finance: Libor Market Model.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 391: 1287–1308. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.08.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baaquie, B. E., and C. Yang. 2009. “Empirical Analysis of Quantum Finance Interest Rates Models.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 388 (13): 2666–2681. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2009.02.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brace, A., D. Gatarek, and M. Musiela. 1997. “The Market Model of Interest Rate Dynamics.” Mathematical Finance 7: 127–155. doi:10.1111/mafi.1997.7.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brace, A., and M. Musiela. 1997. “The Market Model of Interest Rate Dynamics.” Mathematical Finance 7: 127–155. doi:10.1111/1467-9965.00028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberlein, E., and F. Zkan. 2005. “The Lévy LIBOR Model.” Finance and Stochastics 9: 327–348. doi:10.1007/s00780-004-0145-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasserman, P., and S. G. Kou. 2003. “The Term Structure of Simple Forward Rates with Jump Risk.” Mathematical Finance 13 (3): 383–410. doi:10.1111/mafi.2003.13.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasserman, P., and N. Merener. 2003. “Numerical Solution of Jump-Diffusion Libor Market Models.” Finance and Stochastics 7 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1007/s007800200076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, P., A. Lesniewski, and D. Woodward. (2005). “Probability Distribution in the SABR Model of Stochastic Volatility.” preprint.
   Google Scholar
• Haven, E. E. 2002. “A Discussion on Embedding the Black–Scholes Option Pricing Model in a Quantum Physics Setting.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 304: 507–524. doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00568-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, D., R. Jarrow, and A. Morton. 1992. “Bond Pricing and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: A New Methodology for Contingent Claims Valuation.” Econometrica 60: 77–105. doi:10.2307/2951677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamshidian, F. 1997. “Libor and Swap Market Models and Measures.” Finance and Stochastics 1 (4): 293–330. doi:10.1007/s007800050026.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrow, R., H. Li, and F. Zhao. 2007. “Interest Rate Caps Smile Too! But Can the Libor Market Models Capture the Smile?” The Journal of Finance 62 (1): 345–382. doi:10.1111/jofi.2007.62.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, M., and R. Rebonato. 2003. “A Displaced-Diffusion Stochastic Volatility Libor Market Model: Motivation, Definition and Implementation.” Quantitative Finance 3: 458–469. doi:10.1088/1469-7688/3/6/305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurbanmuradov, K. S., and J. Schoenmakers. 2002. “Lognormal Approximations to Libor Market Models.” Journal of Computational Finance 6: 69–100.
   Google Scholar
• Rebonato, R., and R. White. 2009. “Linking Caplets and Swaptions Prices in the LMM-SABR Model.” Journal of Computational Finance 13 (2): 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siopacha, M., and J. Teichmann. 2011. “Weak and Strong Taylor Methods for Numerical Solutions of Stochastic Differential Equations.” Quantitative Finance 11: 517–528. doi:10.1080/14697680903493573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar