Education and income attraction: an online dating field experiment

References

• Akerlof, G. A., and R. E. Kranton. 2000. “Economics and Identity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 715–753. doi:10.1162/qjec.2000.115.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, B. 2012. The Chemistry between Us: Love, Sex, and the Science of Attraction. New York: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1973). “A Theory of Marriage: Part I.” The Journal of Political Economy 81 (4): 813–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belot, M., and J. Fidrmuc. 2010. “Anthropometry of Love: Height and Gender Asymmetries in Interethnic Marriages.” Economics & Human Biology 8 (3): 361–372. doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2010.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., E. Kamenica, and J. Pan. 2015. “Gender Identity and Relative Income within Households.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130: 571–614. doi:10.1093/qje/qjv001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwick, P. W., and E. J. Finkel. 2008. “Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Revisited: Do People Know What They Initially Desire in a Romantic Partner?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (2): 245–264. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwick, P. W., L. B. Luchies, E. J. Finkel, and L. L. Hunt. 2014. “The Predictive Validity of Ideal Partner Preferences: A Review and Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 140 (3): 623–665. doi:10.1037/a0032432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltovich, N., R. Harbaugh, and T. To. 2002. “Too Cool for School? Signalling and Countersignalling.” The RAND Journal of Economics 33 (4): 630. doi:10.2307/3087478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, R., J. Knowles, and N. Guner. 2005. “Love and Money: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Household Sorting and Inequality.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (1): 273–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisman, R., S. S. Iyengar, E. Kamenica, and I. Simonson. 2006. “Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence from a Speed Dating Experiment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (2): 673–697. doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraccaro, P. J., B. C. Jones, J. Vukovic, F. G. Smith, C. D. Watkins, D. R. Feinberg, and L. M. Debruine. 2011. “Experimental Evidence that Women Speak in a Higher Voice Pitch to Men They Find Attractive.” Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 9 (1): 57–67. doi:10.1556/JEP.9.2011.33.1.
   Google Scholar
• Hitsch, G. J., A. Hortaçsu, and D. Ariely. 2010a. “Matching and Sorting in Online Dating.” The American Economic Review 100 (1): 130–163. doi:10.1257/aer.100.1.130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitsch, G. J., A. Hortaçsu, and D. Ariely. 2010b. “What Makes You Click?—Mate Preferences in Online Dating.” Quantitative Marketing and Economics 8 (4): 393–427. doi:10.1007/s11129-010-9088-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzban, R., and J. Weeden. 2005. “Hurrydate: Mate Preferences in Action.” Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 227–244. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, H. H., A. C. Hay, and P. H. Conklin. 2009. “Attractive Men Induce Testosterone and Cortisol Release in Women.” Hormones and Behavior 56 (1): 84–92. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, H. S., and M. Svarer. 2009. “Educational Homogamy: How Much is Opportunities?” Journal of Human Resources 44 (4): 1066–1086. doi:10.1353/jhr.2009.0029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, D. 2014. “Height and Income Attraction: An Online Dating Field Experiment.” Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, D., and J. Wang. 2015. “Income Attraction: An Online Dating Field Experiment.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 111 (March): 13–22. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, D., Y. Yang, and J. Zhang. 2014. “Hard to Get: The Scarcity of Women and the Competition for High-Income Men in Chinese Cities.” Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Roney, J. R., A. W. Lukaszewski, and Z. L. Simmons. 2007. “Rapid Endocrine Responses of Young Men to Social Interactions with Young Women.” Hormones and Behavior 52 (3): 326–333. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C. R. 2013. “Trends and Variation in Assortative Mating: Causes and Consequences.” Annual Review of Sociology 39 (May): 451–470. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C. R., and R. D. Mare. 2005. “Trends in Educational Assortative Marriage from 1940 to 2003.” Demography 42 (4): 621–646. doi:10.1353/dem.2005.0036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, J., and H. Park. 2009. “Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating in 10 East Asian Societies.” Social Forces 88 (September): 227–255. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, J., W. Ultee, and J. Lammers. 1998. “Educational Homogamy in 65 Countries: An Explanation of Differences in Openness Using Country-Level Explanatory Variables.” American Sociological Review 63 (2): 264–285. doi:10.2307/2657327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, M. 1973. “Job Market Signaling.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87: 355–374. doi:10.2307/1882010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombs, S., and I. Silverman. 2004. “Pupillometry.” Evolution and Human Behavior 25 (4): 221–228. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Anders, S. M., P. B. Gray, and S. M. V. Anders. 2007. “Hormones and Human Partnering.” Annual Review of Sex Research 18 (1): 60–93.
   Google Scholar