Rhetoric on the economy: have European parties changed their economic messages?

References

• Adams, J., A. B. Haupt, and H. Stoll. 2009. “What Moves Parties? The Role of Public Opinion and Global Economic Conditions in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (5): 611–639. doi:10.1177/0010414008328637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, R. M., and J. Nagler. 2004. “Party System Compactness: Measurement and Consequences.” Political Analysis 12 (1): 46–62. doi:10.1093/pan/mph003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amable, B. 2000. “Institutional Complementarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production.” Review of International Political Economy 7 (4): 645–687. doi:10.1080/096922900750034572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorós, P., and M. Socorro Puy. 2013. “Issue Convergence or Issue Divergence in a Political Campaign?.” Public Choice 155 (3–4): 355–371. doi:10.1007/s11127-011-9865-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, S. 2000. “Globalization and Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 43–62. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, C. 2000. “Partisan Governments, the International Economy, and Macroeconomic Policies in Advanced Nations, 1960–93.” World Politics 53 (1): 38–73. doi:10.1017/S0043887100009370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräuninger, T. 2005. “A Partisan Model of Government Expenditure.” Public Choice 125 (3–4): 409–429. doi:10.1007/s11127-005-3055-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I., H. Klingemann, A. Volkens, J. Bara, and E. Tannenbaum. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, I., and M. D. McDonald. 2006. “Choices Parties Define Policy Alternatives in Representative Elections, 17 Countries 1945–1998.” Party Politics 12 (4): 451–466. doi:10.1177/1354068806064727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, B. 2012. “Partisan Embedding of Liberalism: How Trade, Investment, and Immigration Affect Party Support for the Welfare State.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (5): 606–635. doi:10.1177/0010414011427132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callander, S., and C. H. Wilson. 2007. “Turnout, Polarization, and Duverger’s Law.” The Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1047–1056. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00606.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., and P. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. R. 1978. “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 72 (4): 1243–1261. doi:10.2307/1954537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Simone, E., and A. Sapio. 2013. “What Lies behind the Promise of Fiscal Austerity? Unveiling the Determinants of Party Positioning in the EU.” Political Science and Political Economy Working Paper Series 4/2013. http://www.lse.ac.uk/government/research/resgroups/PSPE/pdf/Working-papers/2013/PSPE-WP-2013-04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher, A. 2006. “Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a new Index of Globalization.” Applied Economics 38 (10): 1091–1110. doi:10.1080/00036840500392078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, A., N. Gaston, and P. Martens. 2008. Measuring Globalisation – Gauging its Consequences. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. 2001. “Globalization and Policy Convergence.” International Studies Review 3 (1): 53–78. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.00225.
   Google Scholar
• Elff, M. 2009. “Social Divisions, Party Positions, and Electoral Behaviour.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 297–308. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2009.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G. 1999. The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M., and P. G. Cerny. 2003. “Globalization and Social Policy, from Entitlement to Contract.” In Developments in British Social Policy, edited by Ellison, N. and C. Pierson. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, L. 2007. “The Variance Matters: How Party Systems Represent the Preferences of Voters.” The Journal of Politics 69 (1): 182–192. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00503.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, G. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, G., and D. Mitchell. 2001. “Globalization, Government Spending, and Taxation in the OECD.” European Journal of Political Research 39 (2): 145–177. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemenis, K. 2012. “Proxy Documents as a Source of Measurement Error in the Comparative Manifestos Project.” Electoral Studies 31 (3): 594–604. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. 2007. “When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition.” Political Studies 55 (3): 629–655. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, B. 2004. “Downs and Two-Party Convergence.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 25–46. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haupt, A. B. 2010. “Parties’ Responses to Economic Globalization: What is Left for the Left and Right for the Right?.” Party Politics 16 (1): 5–27. doi:10.1177/1354068809339535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwig, T. 2012. “Constructing Accountability: Party Position Taking and Economic Voting.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (1): 91–118. doi:10.1177/0010414011422516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtz-Eakin, D., D. Newey, and H. Rosen. 1988. “Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data.” Econometrica 56 (6): 1371–1395. doi:10.2307/1913103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, C. 2003. Analysis of Panel Data. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, E., and J. Stephens. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare States, Parties and Politics in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, T. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S., and P. Mair. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1 (1): 5–28. doi:10.1177/1354068895001001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S., and P. Mair. 2009. “The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (4): 753–766. doi:10.1017/S1537592709991782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann, H., A. Volkens, J. Bara, I. Budge, and M. D. McDonald. (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27. doi:10.1177/001041407901200101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S. 2009. “From Populism to Clientelism? the Transformation of Labor-Based Party Linkages in Latin America.” In Patrons, Clients and Policies. Patterns of Democratic accountability and Political Competition, edited by Kitschelt, H. and I. W. Wilkinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luther, K. R. 2007. “Electoral Strategies and Performance of Austrian Right-Wing Populism 1986-2006.” Keele European Parties Research Unit (KEPRU) Working Paper, 24.
   Google Scholar
• Michallet, B., G. L. Gaeta, and F. Facchini. 2015. Greening Up or Not? The Determinants Political Parties’ Environmental Concern: An Empirical Analysis Based on European Data (1970-2008).” FEEM Working Paper 025.2015. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2596575
   Google Scholar
• Mikhaylov, S., M.M. Laver, and K. Benoit. 2012. “Coder Reliability and Misclassification in the Human Coding of Party Manifestos.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 78–91. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. 1999. “The Political Economy of International Trade.” Annual Review of. Political Science 2: 91–114. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H. V., and B. Judkins. 2004. “Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is There a Left-Right Divide on Trade Policy?.” International Studies Quarterly 48 (1): 95–120. doi:10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00293.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, R. 1999. Globalization and the Welfare State. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nair-Reichert, U., and D. Weinhold. 2001. “Causality Tests for Cross-Country Panels: A New Look at FDI and Economic Growth in Developing Countries.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 63 (2): 153–171. doi:10.1111/obes.2001.63.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterloh, S. 2012. “Words Speak Louder than Actions: The Impact of Politics on Economic Performance.” Journal of Comparative Economics 40 (3): 318–336. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2012.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesonen, P., and M. Oksanen. 1979. “The 1979 Election in Finland: Good-Bye to the 1970’s.” Scandinavian Political Studies 2 (4): 385–398. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.1979.tb00230.x.
   Google Scholar
• Potrafke, N. 2009. “Did Globalization Restrict Partisan Politics? An Empirical Evaluation of Social Expenditures in a Panel of OECD Countries.” Public Choice 140 (1–2): 105–124. doi:10.1007/s11127-009-9414-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., and J. Sprague. 1986. Paper Stones, A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, D. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, N. D., and C. W. Martin. 2012. “Economic Integration, Party Polarisation and Electoral Turnout.” West European Politics 35 (2): 238–265. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.648005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swank, D. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tavits, M. 2008. “Policy Positions, Issue Importance, and Party Competition in New Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (1): 48–72. doi:10.1177/0010414006293857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, M., and J. Potter. 2014. “The Effect on Inequality and Social Identity on Party Strategies.” American Journal of Political Science. doi:10.1111/ajps.12144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, H., L. Ezrow, and H. Dorussen. 2011. “Globalization, Party positions, and the Median Voter.” World Politics 63 (3): 509–547. doi:10.1017/S004388711100013X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, D., J. H. Kim, M. Graham, and M. Tavits. 2015. “How Economic Integration Affects Party Issue Emphases.” In Comparative Political Studies Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1177/0010414015576745.
   Google Scholar