Uncovering the link between a flexible exchange rate and fundamentals: the case of Central and Eastern European economies

References

• Acaravci, A., and I. Ozturk. 2010. “Testing Purchasing Power Parity in Transition Countries: Evidence from Structural Break.” Amfiteatru Economic XII (27): 190–198.
   Google Scholar
• Angeloni, I., M. Flad, and F. P. Mongelli. 2007. “Monetary Integration of the New EU Member States: What Sets the Pace of Euro Adoption?.” Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (2): 367–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, J., and C. Kao. 2006. “On the Estimation and Inference of a Panel Cointegration Model with Cross-Sectional Dependence.” In Panel Data Economentrics: Theoretical Contributions and Empirical Applications, ed B. H. Baltagi, 3–30. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., M. Marcellino, and C. Osbat. 2004. “Some Cautions on the Use of Panel Methods for Integrated Series of Macroeconomic Data.” The Econometrics Journal 7 (2): 322–340.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., M. Marcellino, and C. Osbat. 2005. “Testing for PPP: Should We Use Panel Methods?” Empirical Economics 30 (1): 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranowski, P. 2011. “Monetary Policy Rule for Poland – Results for Various Specifications.” Oeconomia Copernicana 2 (3): 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, J., A. Belke, and F. Dobnik. 2012. “Cross-Section Dependence and the Monetary Exchange Rate Model – A Panel Analysis.” North American Journal of Economics and Finance 23: 38–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann, J., and R. Czudaj. 2017. “Effective Exchange Rates, Current Accounts and Global Imbalances.” Review of International Economics 25 (3): 500–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekö, J., and D. Boršič. 2007. “Purchasing Power Parity in Transition Economies: Does It Hold in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovenia?” Post-Communist Economies 19 (4): 417–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitung, J., and M. H. Pesaran. 2008. Unit Roots and Cointegration in Panels, 279–322. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Breusch, T. S., and A. R. Pagan. 1980. “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics.” The Review of Economic Studies 47 (1): 239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, G. A., and C. M. Reinhart. 2002. “Fear of Floating.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (2): 379–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candelon, B., C. Kool, K. Raabe, and T. van Veen. 2007. “Long-Run Real Exchange Rate Determinants: Evidence from Eight New EU Member States, 1993–2003.” Journal of Comparative Economics 35: 87–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerra, V., and S. C. Saxena. 2010. “The Monetary Model Strikes Back: Evidence from the World.” Journal of International Economics 81: 184–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, -S.-S., and Y.-H. Chou. 2015. “Revisiting the Relationship between Exchange Rates and Fundamentals.” Journal of Macroeconomics 46: 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo-Cuaresma, J., J. Fidrmuc, and M. A. Silgoner. 2005b. “On the Road: The Path of Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania to the EU and the Euro.” Europe-Asia Studies 57 (6): 843–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo-Cuaresma, J., J. Fidrmuc, and R. MacDonald. 2005a. “The Monetary Approach to Exchange Rates in the CEECs.” Economics of Transition 13 (2): 395–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuestas, J. C. 2009. “Purchasing Power Parity in Central and Eastern European Countries: An Analysis of Unit Roots and Nonlinearities.” Applied Economic Letters 16 (1): 87–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M. A. 2009. “Searching for Optimum Conversion Rate.” In Global Financial Crisis and Euro Zone Enlargement, ed A. Surdej, 101–124. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
   Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M. A., M. Papież, and S. Śmiech. 2014. “Exchange Rates and Monetary Fundamentals in CEE Countries: Evidence from a Panel Approach.” Journal of Macroeconomics 41: 148–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M. A., M. Papież, and S. Śmiech. 2015. “Causal Relations between Nominal Exchange Rates and Monetary Fundamentals in Central and Eastern European Countries.” Economics of Transition 23 (1): 45–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M. A., M. Papież, and S. Śmiech. 2013. “Monetary Exchange Rate Model for the Central European Countries: Evidence from a Panel Approach.” In Proceedings of 7th International Days of Statistics and Economics, eds T. Loster and T. Pavelka, 289–298. Prague: Melandrium.
   Google Scholar
• De Truchis, G., C. Dell’Eva, and B. Keddad. 2017. “On Exchange Rate Comovements: New Evidence from a Taylor Rule Fundamentals Model with Adaptive Learning.” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money 48: 82–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drine, I., and C. Rault. 2008. “Purchasing Power Parity for Developing and Developed Countries. What Can We Learn from Non-Stationary Panel Data Models?” Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (4): 752–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, M., and F. Teal 2010. “Productivity Analysis in Global Manufacturing Production.” Discussion Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, Accessed 3.Feb 2016. http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/4729/paper515.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, M., and S. Bond 2009. Cross-Section Dependence in Nonstationary Panel Models: A Novel Estimator. MPRA Paper 17692, University Library of Munich, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17692/1/MPRApaper 17692.pdf, access: 3.02.2016.
   Google Scholar
• EC, 2017. “Enlargement: Candidate Countries and Potential Candidates.” European Commission, Accessed 10.Oct.2017. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enlarg/candidates.htm
   Google Scholar
• Égert, B., L. Halpern, and R. MacDonald. 2006. “Equilibrium Exchange Rates in Transition Economies: Taking Stock of the Issues.” Journal of Economic Surveys 20 (2): 257–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, C., and K. D. West. 2005. “Exchange Rates and Fundamentals.” Journal of Political Economy 113 (3): 485–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, C., and K. D. West. 2006. “Taylor Rules and the Deutschmark–Dollar Real Exchange Rate.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 38 (5): 1175–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, C., N. C. Mark, and K. D. West. 2008. “Exchange Rate Models are not as Bad as You Think.” In NBER Macroeconomic Annual 2007, Volume 22, edited by D. Acemoglu, K. Rogoff, and M. Woodford. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. F., and C. W. Granger. 1987. “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica 55 (2): 251–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, R. P., and A. K. Rose. 1999. “Understanding Exchange Rate Volatility without the Contrivance of Macroeconomics.” Economic Journal 109: 660–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, J. A., and A. K. Rose. 1995. “Empirical Research on Nominal Exchange Rates.” In Handbook of International Economics, eds. G. M. Grossman and K. Rogoff, 1689–1729. North Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Frömmel, M., G. Garabedian, and F. Schobert. 2011. “Monetary Policy Rules in Central and Eastern European Countries: Does the Exchange Rate Matter?” Journal of Macroeconomics 33: 807–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowski, W., and A. Welfe. 2016. “An Exchange Rate Model with Market Pressures and a Contagion Effect.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 52 (12): 2706–2720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenaway-McGrevy, R., D. Sul, N. Mark, and J.-L. Wu, 2017. “Identifying Exchange Rate Common Factors.” NBER Working Paper 23726.
   Google Scholar
• Groen, J. J. J. 2002. “Cointegration and the Monetary Exchange Rate Model Revisited.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 64 (4): 361–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, L., and C. Wyplosz. 1997. “Equilibrium Exchange Rates in Transition Economies.” IMF Staff Papers 44 (4): 430–461.
   Google Scholar
• Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin. 2003. “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels.” Journal of Econometrics 115 (1): 53–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMF. 1999-2015. Annual Reports on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Various issues from 1999–2015.
   Google Scholar
• IMF. 2004. World Economic Outlook: Advancing Structural Reforms, April 2004. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Ince, O., T. Molodtsova, and D. H. Papell. 2016. “Taylor Rule Deviations and Out-Of-Sample Exchange Rate Predictability.” Journal of International Money and Finance 69: 22–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iossifov, P., 2014. Cross-Border Production Chains and Business Cycle Co-Movement between Central and Eastern European Countries and Euro Area Member States. European Central Bank, Working Paper Series No. 1628.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, C., M. Jianb, T.-Y. Liuc, and C.-W. Su. 2016. “Purchasing Power Parity and Real Exchange Rate in Central Eastern European Countries.” International Review of Economics and Finance 44: 349–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, C. 1999. “Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 90 (1): 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, C., M.-H. Chiang, and B. Chen. 1999. “International R&D Spillovers: An Application of Estimation and Inference in Panel Cointegration.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (S1): 691–709.
   Google Scholar
• Kapetanios, G., M. H. Pesaran, and T. Yamagata. 2011. “Panels with Non-Stationary Multifactor Error Structures.” Journal of Econometrics 160: 326–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kębłowski, P. 2011. “The Behaviour of Exchange Rates in the Central European Countries and Credit Default Risk Premiums.” Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics 3 (4): 221–237.
   Google Scholar
• Koukouritakis, M. 2009. “Testing the Purchasing Power Parity: Evidence from the New EU Countries.” Applied Economics Letters 16: 39–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, A., C. F. Lin, and C. S. J. Chu. 2002. “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties.” Journal of Econometrics 108 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loría, E., A. Sanchez, and U. Salgado. 2010. “New Evidence on the Monetary Approach of Exchange Rate Determination in Mexico 1994–2007: A Cointegrated SVAR Model.” Journal of International Money and Finance 29 (3): 540–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lütkepohl, H. 1994. “Interpretation of Cointegration Relations – Comments on “Estimating Systems of Trending Variables’ by Søren Johansen.” Econometrics Review 13 (3): 391–394.
   Google Scholar
• Lütkepohl, H. 2005. New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, R. K. 2001. The Microstructure Approach to Exchange Rates. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz-Łyziak, J. 2016. “Active and Passive Monetary Policy in CEE Countries with Inflation Targeting: The Case of the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland.” Eastern European Economics 54: 133–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddala, G. S., and S. Wu. 1999. “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (S1): 631–652.
   Google Scholar
• Maeso-Fernandez, F., C. Osbat, and B. Schnatz. 2006. “Towards the Estimation of Equilibrium Exchange Rate for CEE Acceding Countries: Methodological Issues and a Panel Cointegration Perspective.” Journal of Comparative Economics 34: 499–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, N. C., and D. Sul. 2001. “Nominal Exchange Rates and Monetary Fundamentals: Evidence Form a Small post-Bretton Woods Panel.” Journal of International Economics 53: 29–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, A. 2006. “Choice of Exchange Rate Regime in Central and Eastern European Countries: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Comparative Economics 34 (3): 484–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meese, R., and K. Rogoff. 1983. “Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Seventies: Do They Fit Out of Sample?” Journal of International Economics 14: 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NBP, 1998. Medium-Term Strategy of Monetary Policy (1999–2003). National Bank of Poland, Warsaw, http://www.nbp.pl/en/publikacje/o_polityce_pienieznej/strategia.pdf, access: 5.02.2016.
   Google Scholar
• NBP, 2003. Monetary Policy Strategy beyond 2003. National Bank of Poland, Warsaw, http://www.nbp.pl/en/publikacje/o_polityce_pienieznej/strategy_beyond_2003.pdf, access: 5.02.2016.
   Google Scholar
• Obstfed, M., and K. Rogoff. 2001. “The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause?” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Volume 15, eds, B. S. Bernanke and K. Rogoff, 339–412. Cambridge, MA-London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedroni, P. 1999. “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (s1): 653–670.
   Google Scholar
• Pedroni, P. 2001. “Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels.” Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (4): 727–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroni, P. 2007. “Social Capital, Barriers to Production and Capital Shares: Implications for the Importance of Parameter Heterogeneity from a Nonstationary Panel Approach.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22 (2): 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroni, P. 2000. “Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels.” In Nonstationary Panels, Cointegration in Panels and Dynamic Panels, ed B. H. Baltagi, 93–130. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H., 2004. “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels.” Access: 3.Feb 2016. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=572504
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. 2006. “Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure.” Econometrica 74: 967–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. 2007. “A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22 (2): 265–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H., and R. Smith. 1995. “Estimating Long-run Relationships From Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels.” Journal Of Econometrics 68 (1): 79-113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H., Y. Shin, and R. P. Smith. 1999. “Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (446): 621–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, I. V. 2014. “Analysis of the Behavior of Central Banks in Setting Interest Rates. The Case of Central and Eastern European Countries.” Procedia Economics and Finance 15: 1113–1121.
   Google Scholar
• Rapach, D. E., and M. E. Wohar. 2004. “Testing the Monetary Model of Exchange Rate Determination: A Closer Look at Panels.” Journal of International Money and Finance 23: 867–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. D. 1996. “Economic Transition and the Exchange-Rate Regime.” American Economic Review 86 (2): 147–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoveanu, D., and N. Ghiba. 2012. “Purchasing Power Parity: Evidence from Four Cee Countries.” Journal of Academic Research in Economics 4 (1): 80–89.
   Google Scholar
• Sarno, L., and M. Schmeling. 2014. “Which Fundamentals Drive Exchange Rates? A Cross-Sectional Perspective.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 46 (2–3): 267–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sideris, D. 2006. “Purchasing Power Parity in Economies in Transition: Evidence from Central and East European Countries.” Applied Financial Economics 16 (1–2): 135–143.
   Google Scholar
• Solakoglu, E. G. 2006. “Testing Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis for Transition Economies.” Applied Financial Economics 16 (7): 561–568.
   Google Scholar
• Stanisic, N. M. 2013. “Convergence between the Business Cycles of Central and Eastern European Countries and the Euro Area.” Baltic Journal of Economics 13 (1): 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi, S., and V. Ciubotaru. 2013. “Putting the Pieces Together: The Moldovan Exchange Rate Policy Puzzle.” Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe 5 (1): 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Telatar, E., and M. Hasanov. 2009. “Purchasing Power Parity in Central and East European Countries.” Eastern European Economics 47 (5): 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uz, I., and N. Ketenci. 2008. “Panel Analysis of the Monetary Approach to Exchange Rates: Evidence from Ten New EU Members and Turkey.” Emerging Markets Review 9: 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Uz, I., and N. Ketenci. 2010. “Exchange Rate Determination: Monetary Approach in the New EU Members and Turkey.” Applied Economics Letters 17 (10): 963–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerlund, J. 2007. “Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 69 (6): 709–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žďárek, V., 2010. “Some New Empirical Evidence on the Relative PPP Hypothesis in New EU Member States.” Research Centre for Competitiveness of Czech Economy, Working Paper No. 21/2010, Accessed 21 Apr 2016. https://is.muni.cz/do/econ/soubory/oddeleni/centrum/papers/21Zdarek.pdf,
   Google Scholar