Trade liberalisation, poverty, and inequality in Vietnam: a quantile regression approach

References

• Abrevaya, J., and C. M. Dahl. 2008. “The Effects of Birth Inputs on Birthweight.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 26 (4): 379–397. doi:10.1198/073500107000000269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canay, I. A. 2011. “A Simple Approach to Quantile Regression for Panel Data.” The Econometrics Journal 14 (3): 368–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coello, B., M. Fall, and A. Suwa-Eisenmann. 2010. “Trade Liberalization and Poverty Dynamics in Vietnam 2002–2006.” Paris School of Economics (Working Paper No.11), 43.
   Google Scholar
• Deaton, A. 1997. The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deaton, A., and S. Zaidi. 2002. “Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis.” LSMS Working Paper Number 135, 128.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, J. A., and D. H. Romer. 1999. “Does Trade Cause Growth?” American Economic Review 89 (3): 379–399. doi:10.1257/aer.89.3.379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, M., and J. Whalley. 2004. “Are Price Controls Necessarily Bad? the Case of Rice in Vietnam.” Journal of Development Economics, no. 73: 215─232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glewwe, P., N. Agrawal, and D. Dollar, Eds. 2004. Economic Growth, Poverty, and Household Welfare in Vietnam. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Glewwe, P., M. Gragnolati, and H. Zaman. 2000. “Who Gained from Vietnam’s Boom in the 1990s: An Analysis of Poverty and Inequality Trends.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper(wps 2275), 64.
   Google Scholar
• Glewwe, P., M. Gragnolati, and H. Zaman. 2002. “Who Gained from Vietnam’s Boom in the 1990s?” Economic Development and Cultural Change 50 (4): 773–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, J., and S. R. Khandker. 2009. Handbook on Poverty and Inequality. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Heo, Y., and K. D. Nguyen. 2009. “Trade Liberalisation and Poverty Reduction in Vietnam.” The World Economy 32 (6): 934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justino, P., J. Litchfield, and H. T. Pham. 2008. “Poverty Dynamics during Trade Reform: Evidence from Rural Vietnam.” Review of Income and Wealth 54 (2): 166–192. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00269.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker, R., and G. Bassett. 1978. “Regression Quantiles.” Econometrica 46 (1): 33–50. doi:10.2307/1913643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker, R., and K. F. Hallock. 2001. “Quantile Regression.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (4): 56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, D. T., and H. T. Pham. 2009. Construction of the Panel Data Vietnam Household Living Standard Surveys (VHLSS) 2002–2006. Hanoi: Mimeo, Indochina Research and Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Le, M. S., T. Singh, and D. T. Nguyen. 2015. Trade Liberalisation and Poverty: Vietnam Now and Beyond. UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, N., L. A. Winters, and X. Cirera. 2001. Trade Liberalization and Poverty: A Handbook. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Minot, N. 1998. Competitiveness of Food Processing in Vietnam: A Study of the Rice, Coffee, Seafood, and Fruit and Vegetables Subsectors. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, B. T., J. W. Albrecht, S. B. Vroman, and M. D. Westbrook. 2007. “A Quantile Regression Decomposition of Urban-Rural Inequality in Vietnam.” Journal of Deveopment Economics 83 (2): 466–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niimi, Y., P. Vasudeva-Dutta, and L. A. Winters. 2007. “Trade Liberalization and Poverty Dynamics in Vietnam.” Journal of Economic Integration 22 (4): 819–851.
   Google Scholar
• Ravallion, M. 1998. “Poor Areas.” In Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, edited by A. Ullah and D. E. A. Giles, 63─91. New York: Marcel Dekker, .
   Google Scholar
• Ravallion, M. 2006. “Looking beyond Averages in the Trade and Poverty Debate.” World Development 34 (8): 1374–1392. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seshan, G. 2005. “The Impact f Trade Liberalization on Household Welfare in Vietnam.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (wps 3541).
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. 2005. “What Is Poverty? Concepts and Measures.” Poverty in Focus-UNDP International Poverty Centre (December 2006), 24.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, L. A. 2002. “Trade Liberalisation and Poverty: What are the Links?” World Economy 25 (9): 1339–1367. doi:10.1111/1467-9701.00495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, L. A. 2004. “Trade Liberalization and Economic Performance: An Overview.” The Economic Journal 114 (February): 4–21.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, L. A., and A. Martuscelli. 2014. “Trade Liberalization and Poverty: What Have We Learned in a Decade?.” In Annual Reviews of Resource Economics, 6(1), 493─ 512. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, L. A., N. McCulloch, and A. McKay. 2004. “Trade Liberalization and Poverty: The Evidence so Far.” Journal of Economic Literature XLII (March): 72–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2005. Pro-Poor Growth in the 1990s: Lessons and Insights from 14 Countries the Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth Research Program, 116. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2011. Vietnam Development Report 2012: Market Economy for a Middle-Income Vietnam, 90. Hanoi: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2012. Well Begun, Not yet Done: Vietnam’s Remarkable Progress on Poverty Reduction and the Emerging Challenges, 190. Ha Noi: World Bank.
   Google Scholar