435
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Is external research assessment associated with convergence or divergence of research quality across universities and disciplines? Evidence from the PBRF process in New Zealand

, &

References

  • Abbott, M., and C. Doucouliagos. 2000. “Technical and Scale Efficiency of Vocational Education and Training Institutions: The Case of the New Zealand Polytechnics.” New Zealand Economic Papers 34: 1–23.
  • Abbott, M., and C. Doucouliagos. 2003. “The Efficiency of Australian Universities, a Data Envelopment Analysis.” Economics of Education Review 22: 89–97.
  • Abbott, M., and C. Doucouliagos. 2010. “Research Output of Australian Universities.” Education Economics 12: 251–265.
  • Abramovitz, M. 1986. “Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind.” Journal of Economic History 46: 385–406.
  • Adams, J., and K. Gurney. 2010. Funding Selectivity, Concentration and Excellence – How Good Is the UK’s Research? Oxford: Higher Education Research Institute.
  • Barker, K. 2007. “The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The Evolution of a National Research Evaluation System.” Research Evaluation 16: 3–12.
  • Barro, R. J., and X. Sala-i-Martin. 1991. “Convergence.” Journal of Political Economy 100: 223–251.
  • Baumol, W. J. 1986. “Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-run Data Show.” American Economic Review 75: 1072–1085.
  • Biancardi, D., and M. Bratti. 2019. “The Effect of Introducing a Research Evaluation Exercise on Student Enrolment: Evidence from Italy.” Economics of Education Review 69: 73–93.
  • Boyle, G. 2008. “Pay Peanuts and Get Monkeys? Evidence from Academia.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 8 (Article): 21.
  • Broadbent, A. 2010. “The UK Research Assessment Exercise: Performance Measurement and Resource Allocation.” Australian Accounting Review 52: 14–23.
  • Buckle, R. A., and J. Creedy. 2018. “The Impact on Research Quality of Performance-based Funding: The Case of New Zealand’s PBRF Scheme.” Agenda 25: 25–48.
  • Buckle, R. A., and J. Creedy. 2019a. “The Evolution of Research Quality in New Zealand Universities as Measured by the Performance-based Research Fund Process.” New Zealand Economic Papers 53: 144–165.
  • Buckle, R. A., and J. Creedy. 2019b. “An Evaluation of Metrics Used by the Performance-based Research Fund Process in New Zealand.” New Zealand Economic Papers 53: 270–287.
  • Buckle, R. A., and J. Creedy. 2019c. “The ‘Disciplinary Effect’ of the Performance-Based Research Fund Process in New Zealand.” Forthcoming in New Zealand Economic Papers. doi:10.1080/00779954.2019.1636122.
  • Castle, J. L., J. A. Doornik, and D. F. Hendry. 2011. “Evaluating Automatic Model Selection.” Journal of Time Series Econometrics 3: 1–31.
  • Checchi, D., M. Malgarini, and S. Sarlo. 2019. “Do Performance-based Research Funding Systems Affect Research Production and Impact?” Higher Education Quarterly 73: 45–69.
  • de Boer, H., B. Jongbloed, and H. Vossenstey. 2015. Performance-Based Funding and Performance Agreements in Fourteen Higher Education Systems. Enschede, Netherlands: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, Universiteit Twent, pp.164.
  • Dowrick, S., and N. Gemmell. 1991. “Industrialisation, Catching up and Economic Growth: A Comparative Study across the World’s Capitalist Economies.” Economic Journal 101: 263–275.
  • Hare, P. G. 2003. “The United Kingdom’s Research Assessment Exercise: Impact on Institutions, Departments, Individuals.” Higher Education Management and Policy 15: 43–62.
  • Hendry, D. F., and J. A. Doornik. 2014. Empirical Model Discovery and Theory Evaluation: Automatic Model Selection Methods in Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hicks, D. 2012. “Performance-based University Research Funding Schemes.” Research Policy 41: 251–261.
  • Jung, J. 2012. “Faculty Research Productivity in Hong Kong across Academic Discipline.” Studies in Higher Education 2: 1–13.
  • Martin, B. 2011. “The Research Excellence Framework and the Impact Agenda, are We Creating a Frankenstein Monster?” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 247–254.
  • Ministry of Education. 2012. A History and Overview of the PBRF. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
  • New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission. 2002. Investing in Excellence: Report of the Performance-Based Research Fund Working Group. Wellington: Ministry of Education and Transition Tertiary Education Commission.
  • New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission. 2013. Performance-Based Research Fund. Evaluating Research Excellence – The 2012 Assessment. Wellington: Tertiary Education Commission.
  • OECD. 2010. Performance-Based Funding for Public Research in Tertiary Education Institutions: Workshop Proceedings. Paris: OECD.
  • Payne, A. A., and J. Roberts. 2010. “Government Oversight of Public Universities: Are Centralized Performance Schemes Related to Increased Quantity or Quality?” The Review of Economics and Statistics 92: 207–212.
  • Quah, D. T. 1993. “Galton’s Fallacy and the Convergence Hypothesis.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 95: 427–443.
  • Roa, T., J. R. Beggs, J. Williams, and H. Moller. 2009. “New Zealand’s Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF) Model Undermines Maori Research.” Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 39: 233–238.
  • Sabharwal, M. 2013. “Comparing Research Productivity across Disciplines and Career Stages.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 15: 141–163.
  • Shin, J. C., and W. K. Cummings. 2010. “Multilevel Analysis of Academic Publishing across Disciplines: Research Preference, Collaboration, and Time on Research.” Scientometrics 85: 581–594.
  • Smart, W., and R. Engler. 2013. In Pursuit of Excellence: Analysing the Results of New Zealand’s PBRF Quality Evaluations. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
  • Wang, J., and D. Hicks. 2013. “Detecting Structural Change in University Research Systems: A Case Study of British Research Policy.” Research Evaluation 22: 258–268.
  • Wilsdon, J., L. Allen, E. Belfiore, P. Campbell, S. Curry, S. Hill, and B. Johnson (2015) The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment andManagement.
  • Worthington, A. C., and B. L. Lee. 2008. “Efficiency, Technology and Productivity Change in Australian Universities, 1998–2003.” Economics of Education Review 27: 285–298.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.