Investor churn analysis in a P2P lending market

References

• Barasinska, N., and D. Schafer. 2014. “Is Crowdfunding Different? Evidence on the Relation between Gender and Funding Success from a German Peer-to-peer Lending Platform.” German Economic Review 15 (4): 436–452. doi:10.1111/geer.12052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtch, G., A. Ghose, and S. Wattal. 2014. “Cultural Differences and Geography as Determinants of Online Prosocial Lending.” MIS Quarterly 38 (3): 773–794. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.3.07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceyhan, S., X. Shi, and J. Leskovec. 2011. “Dynamics of Bidding in a P2P Lending Service: Effects of Herding and Predicting Loan Success.” Paper presented at the 20th international conference on World wide web, Hyderabad, India.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D., F. Lai, and Z. Lin. 2014. “A Trust Model for Online Peer-to-peer Lending: A Lender’s Perspective.” Information Technology and Management 15: 239–254. doi:10.1007/s10799-014-0187-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D., X. Li, and F. Lai. 2017. “Gender Discrimination in Online Peer-to-peer Credit Lending: Evidence from a Lending Platform in China.” Electronic Commerce Research 17: 553–583. doi:10.1007/s10660-016-9247-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., B. Huang, and D. Ye. 2020. “Gender gap in peer-to-peer lending: Evidence from China.” Journal of Banking & Finance 112: 105633. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, K., and D. Hirshleifer. 2015. “Overconfident Investors, Predictable Returns, and Excessive Trading.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (4): 61–88. doi:10.1257/jep.29.4.61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, J., J. Huang, and M. Meng. 2019. “Is There an Effective Reputation Mechanism in Peer-to-peer Lending? Evidence from China.” Finance Research Letters 30: 208–2015. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2018.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, J., S. Siegel, and L. Young. 2012. “Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending.” The Review of Financial Studies 25 (8): 2455–2484. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhs071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyché, J. 2002. The CRM Handbook: A Business Guide to Customer Relationship Management. New York: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Emekter, R., Y. Tu, B. Jirasakuldech, and M. Lu. 2015. “Evaluating Credit Risk and Loan Performance in Online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending.” Applied Economics 47 (1): 54–70. doi:10.1080/00036846.2014.962222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, C. 2015. “Group Membership, Relationship Banking and Loan Default Risk: The Case of Online Social Lending.” Banking and Finance Review 7 (2): 15–55.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, S., and G. Z. Jin. 2017. “The Information Value of Online Social Networks: Lessons from Peer-to-peer Lending.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 51: 185–222. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2016.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, S., and T. Odean. 2001. “Learning to Be Overconfident.” Journal of Financial Studies 14 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1093/rfs/14.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, M., and M. Weber. 2007. “Overconfidence and Trading Volume.” The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review 32 (1): 1–36. doi:10.1007/s10713-007-0003-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, L., and Y. K. Loureiro. 2014. “When Can a Photo Increase Credit? The Impact of Lender and Borrower Profiles on Online Peer-to-peer Loans.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 2: 44–58. doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2014.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. R., C. R. Harvey, and H. Huang. 2009. “Investor Competence, Trading Frequency, and Home Bias.” Management Science 55 (7): 1094–1106. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinblatt, M., and M. Keloharju. 2009. “Sensation Seeking, Overconfidence, and Trading Activity.” The Journal of Finance 64 (2): 549–578. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01443.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., W. Zhou, C. Luo, C. Liu, and H. Xiong. 2016. “Instance-based Credit Risk Assessment for Investment Decisions in P2P Lending.” European Journal of Operational Research 249: 417–426. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J.-T., Q. Chen, J.-G. Liu, X.-L. Luo, and W. Fan. 2018. “The Persuasion of Borrowers’ Voluntary Information in Peer to Peer Lending: An Empirical Study Based on Elaboration Likelihood Model.” Computers in Human Behavior 78: 200–214. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzenstein, M., S. Sonenshein, and U. M. Dholakia. 2011. “Tell Me a Good Story and I May Lend You Money: The Role of Narratives in Peer-to-peer Lending Decisions.” Journal of Marketing Research 48 (SPL): S138–S149. doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, R., M. Liu, P. He, and Y. Ma. 2019. “Can Investors on P2P Lending Platforms Identify Default Risk?” International Journal of Electronic Commerce 23 (1): 63–84. doi:10.1080/10864415.2018.1512279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagtiani, J., and C. Lemieux. 2018. “Do Fintech Lenders Penetrate Areas that are Underserved by Traditional Banks?” Journal of Economics and Business 100: 43–54. doi:10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, C., Z. Wang, R. Wang, and Y. Ding. 2018a. “Loan Default Prediction by Combining Soft Information Extracted from Descriptive Text in Online Peer-to-peer Lending.” Annals of Operations Research 266: 511–529. doi:10.1007/s10479-017-2668-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., Y.-J. Liu, and R. Lu. 2019. “Social Heterogeneity and Local Bias in Peer-to-peer Lending – Evidence from China.” Journal of Comparative Economics. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2019.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Y.-C.-C. Ho, X. Yan, and Y. Tan. 2018b. “Investor Platform Choice: Herding, Platform Attributes, and Regulations.” Journal of Management Information Systems 35 (1): 86–116. doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1440770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, J., Q. Shang, and Q. Ma. 2019. “The Role of Appearance Attractiveness and Loan Amount in Peer-to-peer Lending: Evidence from Event-related Potentials.” Neuroscience Letters 692: 10–15. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.10.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D. 2020. “The Importance of Detailed Patterns of Herding Behaviour in a P2P Lending Market.” Applied Economics Letters 27 (2): 127–130. doi:10.1080/13504851.2019.1610698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., K. Maeng, and Y. Cho. 2018. “Study on the Determinants of Decision-making in Peer-to-peer Lending in South Korea.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 1–19. doi:10.1080/16081625.2018.1540939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchler, E., and B. Maciejovsky. 2002. “Simultaneous Over-and Underconfidence: Evidence from Experimental Asset Markets.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 25 (1): 65–85. doi:10.1023/A:1016319430881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., and B. Lee. 2012. “Herding Behavior in Online P2P Lending: An Empirical Investigation.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 11: 495–503. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2012.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., and J. Hu. 2019. “Does University Reputation Matter? Evidence from Peer-to-peer Lending.” Finance Research Letters 31: 66–77. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2019.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., K. Li, X. Yao, and Q. Wen. 2019. “Predicting Prepayment and Default Risks of Unsecured Consumer Loans in Online Lending.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 55 (1): 118–132. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2018.1479251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M., N. R. Prabhala, and S. Viswanathan. 2013. “Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-peer Lending.” Management Science 59 (1): 17–35. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X., X. Li, and Z. Zheng. 2017. “Evaluating Borrower’s Default Risk in Peer-to-peer Lending: Evidence from a Lending Platform in China.” Applied Economics 49 (35): 3538–3545. doi:10.1080/00036846.2016.1262526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., and L.-Q. Xia. 2017. “An Evolutionary Behavior Forecasting Model for Online Lenders and Borrowers in Peer-to-peer Lending.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research 34 (1): 1740008. doi:10.1142/S0217595917400085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, B., and Z. Lin. 2013. “A Decision Tree Model for Herd Behavior and Empirical Evidence from the Online P2P Lending Market.” Information Systems and e-Business Management 11: 141–160. doi:10.1007/s10257-011-0182-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, D. G., and J. R. Sydnor. 2011. “What’s in a Picture? Evidence of Discrimination from Prosper.com.” Journal of Human Resources 46 (1): 53–92. doi:10.1353/jhr.2011.0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, D., C. Krumme, and A. Lippman. 2010. “Follow the Profit or the Herd? Exploring Social Effects in Peer-to-peer Lending.” Paper presented at the 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing, Minneapolis, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, X., Q. Jin, and L. He. 2020. “The Bilateral Effects of Platform-sponsored Collateral in Peer-to-peer Lending: Evidence from China.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 56 (4): 771–795. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2018.1530982
   Google Scholar
• Statman, M., S. Thorley, and K. Vorkink. 2006. “Investor Overconfidence and Trading Volume.” The Review of Financial Studies 19 (4): 1531–1565. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhj032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinugroho, I., and R. Sembel. 2011. “Overconfidence and Excessive Trading Behavior: An Experimental Study.” International Journal of Business and Management 6 (7): 147–152. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v6n7p147.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, Q., D. Chen, and W. Shi. 2016. “Online Peer-to-peer Lending Decision Making: Model Development and Testing.” Social Behavior and Personality 44 (1): 117–130. doi:10.2224/sbp.2016.44.1.117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., W. Zhang, X. Zhao, and J. Wang. 2019. “Soft Information in Online Peer-to-peer Lending: Evidence from a Leading Platform in China.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 36: 100873. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., C. Jiang, Y. Ding, X. Lyu, and Y. Liu. 2018. “A Novel Behavioral Scoring Model for Estimating Probability of Default over Time in Peer-to-peer Lending.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 27: 74–82. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2017.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, S. 2015. “Internet Lending in China: Status Quo, Potential Risks and Regulatory Options.” Computer Law & Security Review 31: 793–809. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2015.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J. J., and M. Chau. 2018. “Cheap Talk? The Impact of Lender-borrower Communication on Peer-to-peer Lending Outcomes.” Journal of Management Information Systems 35 (1): 53–85. doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1440776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., and X. Chen. 2017. “Herding in a P2P Lending Market: Rational Inference or Irrational Trust?” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 23: 45–53. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2017.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., K. Hung, and T. Chang. 2017. “P2P Loans and Bank Loans, the Chicken and the Egg, What Causes What?: Further Evidence from a Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Test.” Applied Economics Letters 24 (19): 1358–1362. doi:10.1080/13504851.2017.1279261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar