Modernization plans for the Mexican customs system: have they really worked? A productivity impact assessment

References

• Arvis, J. F., L. Ojala, C. Wiederer, B. Shepherd, A. Raj, K. Dairabayeva, and T. Kiiski. 2018. Connecting to Compete 2018. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/29971/LPI2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. 1995. “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data.” Empirical economics 20 (4): 325–332. doi:10.1007/BF01205442.
   Google Scholar
• Battese, G. E., D. S. P. Rao, and C. J. O’donnell. 2004. “A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 21: 91–103. doi:10.1023/B:PROD.0000012454.06094.29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benazić, A. 2012. “Measuring Efficiency in the Croatian Customs Service: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach.” Customs Administration of the Republic of Croatia 36 (2): 139–178. doi:10.3326/fintp.36.2.2.
   Google Scholar
• Cantes, T., G. Raballand, and S. Bilangna. 2010. “Reforming Customs by Measuring Performance: A Cameroon Case Study.” World Customs Journal WCO Research Paper WCO Research Paper 4 (Number 2). 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Caves, D., L. Christensen, and W. Diewert. 1982. “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Inputs, Outputs and Productivity.” Econometrica 50 (6): 1393–1414. doi:10.2307/1913388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. November, 1978. “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2 (6): 429–444. 1978. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economy Secretariat. (2019). Fichas de Comercio Exterior: TMEC [Foreign Trade Files: TMEC]. https://www.economia.gob.mx/files/gobmx/comercioexterior/fichas/TMEC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Färe, R., and D. Primont. 1995. Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• General Customs Administration. 2018. Análisis Estratégico de Aduanas [A Strategic Analysis of the Customs System]. Mexico City: Secretariat of Finance and Public Credit and Customs Tax Administration Service.
   Google Scholar
• Gordhan, P. 2007. “Customs in the 21st Century.” World Customs Journal 1 (1): 49–54. https://worldcustomsjournal.org/Archives/Volume%201,%20Number%201%20(Mar%202007)/00%20Complete%20Issue%20WCJ_Volume_1_Number_1.pdf#page=57.
   Google Scholar
• INEGI. 2021. “Cuentas por Sectores Institucionales de Mexico. Cifras durante el Primer Trimestre de 2021.” In: Instituto Nacional de Geografia y Estadistica, edited by D. F. Mexico, 1–17. Mexico: INEGI.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, R., T. Cantens, and T. Yasui. 2011. “An Overview of Performance Measurement in Customs Administrations.” World Customs Journal WCO Research Paper No WCO Research Paper No 13. 1–10 .
   Google Scholar
• Kilibarda, M., M. Andrejić, and V. Popović. 2017. Efficiency of Logistics Procedures in Customs Procedures. Proceedings of the 3rd international logistics conference. (Belgrade volume).Belgrade, Serbia, 154–159.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, C. A. K. 2002. “Performance Assessment in the Public Sector.” In Efficiency in the Public Sector, edited by K. Fox, 11–36. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, M. L., and W. H. Chan. 2004. University Efficiency: A Comparison and Consolidation of Results from Stochastic and Non-Stochastic Methods. University of Alberta Economics Working Paper Series, Nº. 2005-04.
   Google Scholar
• National System of Foreign Trade Information. (2015). ¿Qué es la facilitación comercial? [What is trade facilitation?]. http://www.siicex.gob.mx/portalSiicex/consultapublica/quees.htm
   Google Scholar
• O’donnell, C. J., D. S. Prasada Rao, and G. E. Battese. 2007. “Metafrontier Frameworks for the Study of Firm-Level Efficiencies and Technology Ratios.” Empirical economics 34 (2): 231–255. doi:10.1007/s00181-007-0119-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, D., and J. Lee. 2007. “A Metafrontier Approach for Measuring Malmquist Productivity Index.” Empirical economics 38 (1): 47–64. doi:10.1007/s00181-009-0255-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastor, J. T., and C. Lovell. 2005. “A Global Malmquist Productivity Index.” Economics Letters 88 (2): 266–271. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2005.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasada, D. S., C. J. O’donnell, and G. E. Battese. 2003. Metafrontier Functions for the Study of Inter-Regional Productivity Differences. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Working Paper Series No. 01/2003, School of Economics, University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Rashidi, K., and K. Cullinane. 2019. “Evaluating the Sustainability of National Logistics Performance Using Data Envelopment Analysis.” Transport Policy 74: 35–46. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, S. C. 2004. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Techniques for Economics and Operations Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. The Journal of Political Economy 98 (5, Part 2): S71–102 Chicago 10.1086/261725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, J. K. 1995. “Economic Theory and DEA .” In Dynamics of Data Envelopment Analysis, edited by J. L. Sengupta, 250–276. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Somani, R. 2021. Public-Sector Productivity (Part 1). https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/913321612847439794/pdf/Public-Sector-Productivity-Part-One-Why-Is-It-Important-and-How-Can-We-Measure-It.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Soo Choi, Y. 2017. Customs Policies and Trade Efficiency. World Customs Organization Research Paper No. 42.
   Google Scholar
• Tax Administration Service. (2016). La Modernización Aduanera Facilita el Comercio Internacional: SAT [The Modernization of the Customs System Facilitates International Trade: SAT]. https://www.gob.mx/sat/prensa/http-www-gob-mx-sat-prensa-com2016_109
   Google Scholar
• Tax Administration Service. (2019). ¿Qué es PITA? [What is PITA?]. http://omawww.sat.gob.mx/PITA/Paginas/default.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tulkens, H., and P. Vanden Eeckaut. 1995. “Non-Parametric Efficiency, Progress and Regress Measures for Panel Data: Methodological Aspects.” European Journal of Operational Research 80 (3): 474–499. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)00132-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Waldt, G. 2004. Managing Performance in the Public Sector: Concepts, Considerations and Challenges. Lansdowne: Juta and Company Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Volpe, C., J. Carballo, and A. Graziano. 2014. “Customs.” Journal of International Economics 96 (1): 119–137. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2010). World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS). https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/MEX
   Google Scholar
• World Customs Organization. (2019). Strategic Plan 2019–2022. http://www.wcoomd.org/-/media/wco/public/global/pdf/about-us/administrative-documents/wco-strategic-plan-2019-2022.pdf?db=web
   Google Scholar
• Zamora Torres, A. I. 2017. “La eficiencia de las aduanas de la región APEC: Un análisis del modelo DEA Malmquist [Customs efficiency in the APEC region: An analysis of the DEA Malmquist model].” México y la Cuenca del Pacífico 6(18): 17–36. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-53082017000300017
   Google Scholar
• Zamora Torres, A. I., and J. C. L. Navarro Chávez. 2014. “Eficiencia de la administración pública aduanera a través del modelo DEA. [Efficiency of customs public administration through the DEA model].” Confines 20: 117–135.
   Google Scholar
• Zamora Torres, A. I., J. C. L. Navarro Chávez, and O. Pedraza Rendón. 2013. “The Impact in Customs Efficiency of the ITSW: Mexico Case of Study.” iBusiness 5: 1–6. doi:10.4236/ib.2013.52B001.
   Google Scholar