A neurocognitive study of the emotional impact of geometrical criteria of architectural space

References

• Arnheim, Rudolf. 1971. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, P., P. Mavros, R. Coyne, and J. Roe. 2015. “The Urban Brain: Analysing Outdoor Physical Activity with Mobile EEG.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 49 (4): 272–276. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzazy, Sameh, Amirhosein Ghaffarianhoseini, Ali GhaffarianHoseini, Nicola Naismith, and Zohreh Doborjeh. 2020. “A Critical Review on the Impact of Built Environment on Users’ Measured Brain Activity.” Architectural Science Review, 1–17. doi:10.1080/00038628.2020.1749980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaei, Maryam, Ali Ahmadi, and Abbas Yazdanfar. 2017. “Application of AI Methods in the Clustering of Architecture Interior Forms.” Frontiers of Architectural Research 6 (3): 360–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaei, Maryam, Javad Hatami, Abbas Yazdanfar, and Klaus Gramann. 2017. “Walking Through Architectural Spaces: The Impact of Interior Forms on Human Brain Dynamics.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11: 477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaei, Maryam, Abbas Yazdanfar, Mostafa Nooreddin, and Ali Yoonessi. 2015. “Enhancing Urban Trails Design Quality by Using Electroencephalography Device.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 201: 386–396.
   Google Scholar
• Bar, Moshe, and Maital Neta. 2008. “The Proactive Brain: Using Rudimentary Information to Make Predictive Judgments.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 7 (4-5): 319–330.
   Google Scholar
• Bermúdez, José Luis. 2017. “Ownership and the Space of the Body.” The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body 2017: 117–144.
   Google Scholar
• Bertamini, Marco, Letizia Palumbo, Tamara Nicoleta Gheorghes, and Mai Galatsidas. 2016. “Do Observers Like Curvature or do They Dislike Angularity?” British Journal of Psychology 107 (1): 154–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, Mehul, Christoph Hölscher, and Thomas F. Shipley. 2011. “Spatial Cognition for Architectural Design SCAD 2011 A Symposium of Researchers, Educators, and Industry Practitioners. New York, USA.” Http://Www.Sfbtr8.Spatial-Cognition.De/Cosy/Events/SCAD-11/. November 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, E., J. Santamaría, V. D. Chamizo, and T. Rodrigo. 2006. “Area and Peak Shift Effects in a Navigation Task with Rats.” International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 6 (3): 313–330.
   Google Scholar
• Blood, A. J., and R. J. Zatorre. 2001. “Intensely Pleasurable Responses to Music Correlate with Activity in Brain Regions Implicated in Reward and Emotion.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 (20): 11818–11823. doi:10.1073/pnas.191355898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botella, C., R. M. Baños, C. Perpiñá, H. Villa, Mu Alcaniz, and A. Rey. 1998. “Virtual Reality Treatment of Claustrophobia: A Case Report.” Behaviour Research and Therapy 36 (2): 239–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botella, Cristina, H. Villa, R. Baños, Concepción Perpiñá, and Azucena Garcia-Palacios. 1999. “The Treatment of Claustrophobia with Virtual Reality: Changes in Other Phobic Behaviors Not Specifically Treated.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 2 (2): 135–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bower, Isabella, Richard Tucker, and Peter G. Enticott. 2019. “Impact of Built Environment Design on Emotion Measured Via Neurophysiological Correlates and Subjective Indicators: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 66: 101344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary. s.v. “proportion”. Accessed June 18, 2020. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/proportion.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, Seung Hyun, Choongwan Koo, Tae Wan Kim, and Taehoon Hong. 2019. “Spatial Perception of Ceiling Height and Type Variation in Immersive Virtual Environments.” Building and Environment 163: 106285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Yoorim, Minjung Kim, and Chungyoon Chun. 2015. “Measurement of Occupants’ Stress Based on Electroencephalograms (EEG) in Twelve Combined Environments.” Building and Environment 88: 65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, Heeyoung, Jack L. Nasar, Bardia Nikrahei, and Dirk B. Walther. 2017. “Neural Codes of Seeing Architectural Styles.” Scientific Reports 7 (1): 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, Alex, Oshin Vartanian, and Anjan Chatterjee. 2017. “Buildings, Beauty, and the Brain: A Neuroscience of Architectural Experience.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 29 (9): 1521–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, Alexander, Oshin Vartanian, Yoed N. Kenett, Marcos Nadal, Franziska Hartung, Gregor Hayn-Leichsenring, Gorka Navarrete, José L. González-Mora, and Anjan Chatterjee. 2020. “Psychological and Neural Responses to Architectural Interiors.” Cortex 126: 217–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, Ann Sloan, and Cláudia Campos Andrade. 2017. “Quality of the Hospital Experience: Impact of the Physical Environment.” In Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research, 421–440. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, Miguel Sales, Sara Eloy, Miguel Carreiro, Pedro Proença, Ana Moural, Tiago Pedro, João Freitas, Elisângela Vilar, Jorge D’alpuim, and António Sérgio Azevedo. 2014. “Designing Better Spaces for People – Virtual Reality and Biometric Sensing as Tools to Evaluate Space Use.” The Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, Betsey Olenick, and Michael A. Arbib. 2013. “The Evolution of Neuroscience for Architecture: Introducing the Special Issue.” Intelligent Buildings International 5 (sup1): 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Duque, Almudena, Alvaro Sanchez, and Carmelo Vazquez. 2014. “Gaze-Fixation and Pupil Dilation in the Processing of Emotional Faces: The Role of Rumination.” Cognition and Emotion 28 (8): 1347–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, John P, ed. 2007. Architecture and the Brain A New Knowledge Base from Neuroscience. Atlanta, GA: Greenway Communications, Ostberg.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhard, John P. 2009. Brain Landscape the Coexistence of Neuroscience and Architecture. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelstein, Eve A. 2008. “Building Health.” HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal 1 (2): 54–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelstein, Eve A., Klaus Gramann, Jurgen Schulze, Nima Bigdely Shamlo, Elke van Erp, Andrey Vankov, Scott Makeig, Laura Wolszon, and Eduardo Macagno. 2008. “Neural Responses During Navigation in the Virtual Aided Design Laboratory: Brain Dynamics of Orientation in Architecturally Ambiguous Space.” Movement and Orientation in Built Environments: Evaluating Design Rationale and User Cognition 35: 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Edelstein, Eve A., and Eduardo Macagno. 2012. “Form Follows Function: Bridging Neuroscience and Architecture.” In Sustainable Environmental Design in Architecture, 27–41. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• EMOTIVE. “Emotive Insight.” Accessed July 19, 2020. https://www.emotiv.com/insight/.
   Google Scholar
• Ergan, Semiha, Ahmed Radwan, Zhengbo Zou, Hua-an Tseng, and Xue Han. 2019. “Quantifying Human Experience in Architectural Spaces with Integrated Virtual Reality and Body Sensor Networks.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 33 (2): 04018062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergan, Semiha, Zhuoya Shi, and Xinran Yu. 2018. “Towards Quantifying Human Experience in the Built Environment: A Crowdsourcing Based Experiment to Identify Influential Architectural Design Features.” Journal of Building Engineering 20: 51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkan, Ä°lker. 2018. “Examining Wayfinding Behaviours in Architectural Spaces Using Brain Imaging with Electroencephalography (EEG).” Architectural Science Review 61 (6): 410–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essawy, Sally, Basil Kamel, and Mohamed S. Elsawy. 2014. “TIMELESS BUILDINGS AND THE HUMAN BRAIN: The Effect of Spiritual Spaces on Human Brain Waves.” International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR 8 (1): 133.
   Google Scholar
• Fischl, Geza, and Anita Gärling. 2008. “Identification, Visualization, and Evaluation of a Restoration-Supportive Built Environment.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 254–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz, Jill. 2019. “Towards a Spatiality of Wellbeing.” In School Spaces for Student Wellbeing and Learning, 3–19. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, G., M. von der Heyde, and H. H. Bülthoff. 2005. “An Empirical Approach to the Experience of Architectural Space in Virtual Reality—Exploring Relations Between Features and Affective Appraisals of Rectangular Indoor Spaces.” Automation in Construction 14: 165–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedenberg, Jay, and Marco Bertamini. 2015. “Aesthetic Preference for Polygon Shape.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 33 (2): 144–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiser, Moritz, and Peter Walla. 2011. “Objective Measures of Emotion During Virtual Walks Through Urban Environments.” Applied Sciences 1 (1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, Robert. 1983. “The Experience of Personal Space: Perception of Interpersonal Distance.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 7 (3): 170–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhagen, Sarah Williams, and Andrea Gallo. 2017. Welcome to your World: How the Built Environment Shapes our Lives. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, Paul. 2006. “Design Aesthetics: Principles of Pleasure in Design.” Psychology Science 48 (2): 157.
   Google Scholar
• Hekmatmanesh, Amin, Maryam Banaei, Khosro Sadeghniiat Haghighi, and Arezu Najafi. 2019. “Bedroom Design Orientation and Sleep Electroencephalography Signals.” Acta Medica International 6 (1): 33.
   Google Scholar
• Heydarian, Arsalan, Evangelos Pantazis, David Gerber, and Burcin Becerik-Gerber. 2015. Use of Immersive Virtual Environments to UnderstandHuman-Building Interactions and Improve Building Design.Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Higuera-Trujillo, Juan Luis, Carmen Llinares Millan, Antoni Montanana i Avino, and Juan-Carlos Rojas. 2020. “Multisensory Stress Reduction: a Neuro-Architecture Study of Paediatric Waiting Rooms.” Building Research & Information 48 (3): 269–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, Justin, and Veronica Foster. 2016. “Brain Responses to Architecture and Planning: A Preliminary Neuro-Assessment of the Pedestrian Experience in Boston, Massachusetts.” Architectural Science Review 59 (6): 474–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, Justin B., Alexandra Purdy, Andrew Wiley, Veronica Foster, Robert JK Jacob, Holly A. Taylor, and Tad T. Brunyé. 2019. “Seeing the City: Using eye-Tracking Technology to Explore Cognitive Responses to the Built Environment.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 12 (2): 156–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hubel, David H., and Torsten N. Wiesel. 1979. “Brain Mechanisms of Vision.” Scientific American 241 (3): 150–162. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24965293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunley, Samuel B., Arwen M. Marker, and Stella F. Lourenco. 2017. “Individual Differences in the Flexibility of Peripersonal Space.” Experimental Psychology 64 (1): 49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, Cale. “Field of View Face-Off: Rift Vs Vive Vs Gear VR Vs PSVR.” Accessed July 19, 2020. https://www.vrheads.com/field-view-faceoff-rift-vs-vive-vs-gear-vr-vs-psvr.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, Md Kafiul, Amir Rastegarnia, and Zhi Yang. 2016. “Methods for Artifact Detection and Removal from Scalp EEG: A Review.” Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology 46 (4-5): 287–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelić, Andrea. 2015. “Designing “pre-Reflective” Architecture. Implications of Neurophenomenology for Architectural Design and Thinking.” Ambiances.Environnement Sensible, Architecture Et Espace Urbain (1).
   Google Scholar
• Jelić, Andrea, Gaetano Tieri, Federico De Matteis, Fabio Babiloni, and Giovanni Vecchiato. 2016. “The Enactive Approach to Architectural Experience: A Neurophysiological Perspective on Embodiment, Motivation, and Affordances.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakas, Tulay, and Dilek Yildiz. 2020. “Exploring the Influence of the Built Environment on Human Experience Through a Neuroscience Approach: A Systematic Review.” Frontiers of Architectural Research 9 (1): 236–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karandinou, Anastasia, and Louise Turner. 2017. “Architecture and Neuroscience; What Can the EEG Recording of Brain Activity Reveal About a Walk Through Everyday Spaces?” International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems 32 (sup1): S54–S65.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, John M. 1988. “Line Endings and Subjective Contours.” Spatial Vision 3 (3): 151–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kieferle, Joachim, and Uwe Wössner. 2001, August 29–31. “Showing the Invisible. Seven Rules for a New Approach of Using Immersive Virtual Reality in Architecture. 19th eCAADe Conference Proceedings, Architectural Information Management, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 376–381.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, Ulrich, Martin Skov, Mark Schram Christensen, and Niels Nygaard. 2009. “Brain Correlates of Aesthetic Expertise: A Parametric fMRI Study.” Brain and Cognition 69 (2): 306–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrand, Dorothée, Claudio Brozzoli, Yves Rossetti, and Alessandro Farnè. 2007. “Close to Me: Multisensory Space Representations for Action and Pre-Reflexive Consciousness of Oneself-in-the-World.” Consciousness and Cognition 16 (3): 687–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leisman, Gerry, Ahmed A. Moustafa, and Tal Shafir. 2016. “Thinking, Walking, Talking: Integratory Motor and Cognitive Brain Function.” Frontiers in Public Health 4: 94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lettieri, Giada, Giacomo Handjaras, Emiliano Ricciardi, Andrea Leo, Paolo Papale, Monica Betta, Pietro Pietrini, and Luca Cecchetti. 2019. “Emotionotopy in the Human Right Temporo-Parietal Cortex.” Nature Communications 10 (1): 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Xiangfeng, Kaihuai Deng, Fang’ai Chi, Yinxiong Wang, Yue Huang, and Changhai Peng. 2020, July 2. “An Investigation of a Field Function Description of Spatial Perception from the Viewpoint of Raumplan.” Architectural Science Review, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Xin, Ihab Hijazi, Reinhard Koenig, Zhihan Lv, Chen Zhong, and Gerhard Schmitt. 2016. “Assessing Essential Qualities of Urban Space with Emotional and Visual Data Based on GIS Technique.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 5 (11): 218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livio, Mario. 2008. The Golden Ratio: The Story of phi, the World’s Most Astonishing Number. Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Donna M. 2009. “The Space Between Us: A Neurophilosophical Framework for the Investigation of Human Interpersonal Space.” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 33 (3): 297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Chi-Hung, Ya-Chuan Ko, and Shih-Wen Hsiao. 2015. “A Study That Applies Aesthetic Theory and Genetic Algorithms to Product Form Optimization.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 29 (3): 662–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenco, Stella F., Matthew R. Longo, and Thanujeni Pathman. 2011. “Near Space and its Relation to Claustrophobic Fear.” Cognition 119 (3): 448–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, Diane A., Charles G. Gross, and David B. Bender. 1976. “A Visual Deficit After Superior Colliculus Lesions in Monkeys.” Acta Neurobiol.Exp 36: 169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallgrave, Harry Francis. 2010. The Architect’s Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity, and Architecture. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Marchette, S. A., L. K. Vass, J. Ryan, and R. A. Epstein. 2015. “Outside Looking in: Landmark Generalization in the Human Navigational System.” The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 35 (44): 14896–14908. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2270-15.2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Soto, Joel, Leopoldo Gonzales-Santos, Erick Pasaye, and Fernando A. Barrios. 2013. “Exploration of Neural Correlates of Restorative Environment Exposure Through Functional Magnetic Resonance.” Intelligent Buildings International 5 (sup1): 10–28.
   Google Scholar
• Mavros, Panagiotis, Martin Zaltz Austwick, and Andrew Hudson Smith. 2016. “Geo-EEG: Towards the use of EEG in the Study of Urban Behaviour.” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 9 (2): 191–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miriam Webster Dictionary. “Protrusion.” Accessed June 18, 2020. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/protrusion.
   Google Scholar
• Morie, Jacquelyn Ford, Kumar Iyer, Donat-Pierre Luigi, Josh Williams, and Aimee Dozois. 2005. “Development of a Data Management Tool for Investigating Multivariate Space and Free Will Experiences in Virtual Reality.” Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 30 (3): 319–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murcia, Grima, Maria J. Ortíz, M. A. López-Gordo, José M. Ferrández, Francisco Sánchez Ferrer, and Eduardo Fernández. 2019. “Neural Representation of Different 3D Architectural Images: An EEG Study.” Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 26 (2): 197–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda, Upali, Debajyoti Pati, Hessam Ghamari, and Robyn Bajema. 2013. “Lessons from Neuroscience: Form Follows Function, Emotions Follow Form.” Intelligent Buildings International 5 (sup1): 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Nanda, Upali, Debajyoti Pati, and Katie McCurry. 2009. “Neuroesthetics and Healthcare Design.” HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal 2 (2): 116–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr, S., C. E. Echavarria, and R. B. Tootell. 2014. “Thinking Outside the Box: Rectilinear Shapes Selectively Activate Scene-Selective Cortex.” The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 34 (20): 6721–6735. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4802-13.2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, Chris, Peter Aspinall, Jenny Roe, Sara Tilley, Panagiotis Mavros, Steve Cinderby, Richard Coyne, Neil Thin, Gary Bennett, and Catharine Ward Thompson. 2017. “The Aging Urban Brain: Analyzing Outdoor Physical Activity Using the Emotiv Affectiv Suite in Older People.” Journal of Urban Health 94 (6): 869–880. http://dx.doi.org.ezlibrary.technion.ac.il/10.1007/s11524-017-0191-9. https://www-proquest-com.ezlibrary.technion.ac.il/docview/1963776228?accountid=27233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberfeld, Daniel, and Heiko Hecht. 2011. “Fashion Versus Perception: The Impact of Surface Lightness on the Perceived Dimensions of Interior Space.” Human Factors 53 (3): 284–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olbrich, Sebastian, Johannes Jödicke, Christian Sander, Hubertus Himmerich, and Ulrich Hegerl. 2011. “ICA-Based Muscle Artefact Correction of EEG Data: What is Muscle and What is Brain?: Comment on McMenamin Et Al.” NeuroImage 54 (1): 1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallasmaa, Juhani, Harry Francis Mallgrave, and Michael A. Arbib. 2013. Architecture and Neuroscience. Tapio Wirkkala-Rut Bryk Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Stephen E. 1999. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo, Letizia, and Marco Bertamini. 2016. “The Curvature Effect: A Comparison Between Preference Tasks.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 34 (1): 35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papale, Paolo, Leonardo Chiesi, Alessandra C. Rampinini, Pietro Pietrini, and Emiliano Ricciardi. 2016. “When Neuroscience ‘Touches’ Architecture: From Hapticity to a Supramodal Functioning of the Human Brain.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pati, Debajyoti, Michael O’Boyle, Jiancheng Hou, Upali Nanda, and Hessam Ghamari. 2016. “Can Hospital Form Trigger Fear Response?” HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal 9 (3): 162–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Flip, J. Farley Norman, and Amanda M. Beers. 2011. “Fechner’s Aesthetics Revisited.” In Fechner’s Legacy in Psychology, 183–191. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Porras, Desiderio Cano, Gabriel Zeilig, Glen M. Doniger, Yotam Bahat, Rivka Inzelberg, and Meir Plotnik. 2020. “Seeing Gravity: Gait Adaptations to Visual and Physical Inclines–A Virtual Reality Study.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 13: 1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratama, S. H., A. Rahmadhani, A. Bramana, P. Oktivasari, N. Handayani, F. Haryanto, and S. N. Khotimah. 2020. “Signal Comparison of Developed EEG Device and Emotiv Insight Based on Brainwave Characteristics Analysis.” Journal of Physics 1505 (1): 012071.
   Google Scholar
• Pupil-Labs. “Pupil Labs VR/AR.” Accessed July 19, 2020. https://pupil-labs.com/products/vr-ar/.
   Google Scholar
• Purtle, Ronald B. 1973a. “Peak Shift: A Review.” Psychological Bulletin 80 (5): 408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purtle, Ronald B. 1973b. “Peak Shift: A Review.” Vol. 80 American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035233. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1974-08409-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
   Google Scholar
• Pykett, Jessica. 2015. Brain Culture: Shaping Policy Through Neuroscience. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, Vilayanur S., and William Hirstein. 1999. “The Science of Art: A Neurological Theory of Aesthetic Experience.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (6-7): 15–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, Vilayanur, and William Hirstein. 2011. “The Paradoxical Self.” In The Paradoxical Brain, edited by Narinder Kapur, 94–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rimmer, Scott. 1997. “The Symbolic Form of Architecture: An Investigation into its Philosophical Foundations and a Discussion on the Development of the Perception of Architectural Form by Modern Heoreticians and Symbolist Architects.” PhD diss., Virginia Tech.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Sarah, and Juhani Pallasmaa. 2015. Mind in Architecture: Neuroscience, Embodiment, and the Future of Design. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Ortega, Alejandro, Beatriz Rey Solaz, and Mariano Luis Alcañiz Raya. 2011. “Immersive Virtual Environments for Emotional Engineering: Description and Preliminary Results.” Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine 9: 161–164.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Vives, Maria V., and Mel Slater. 2005. “From Presence to Consciousness Through Virtual Reality.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6 (4): 332–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemesh, Avishag, Moshe Bar, and Yasha Jacob Grobman. 2015, May 20–22. “Space and Human Perception. Emerging Experience in Past, Present and Future of Digital Architecture, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2015), Daegu, pp. 541–550.
   Google Scholar
• Shemesh, Avishag, Ronen Talmon, Ofer Karp, Idan Amir, Moshe Bar, and Yasha Jacob Grobman. 2017. “Affective Response to Architecture–Investigating Human Reaction to Spaces with Different Geometry.” Architectural Science Review 60 (2): 116–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, James, Megan Freeth, Kimberley J. Simpson, and Kevin Thwaites. 2019. “Visual Engagement with Urban Street Edges: Insights Using Mobile eye-Tracking.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 12 (3): 259–278.
   Google Scholar
• Stamps III, Arthur E. 2011. “Effects of Area, Height, Elongation, and Color on Perceived Spaciousness.” Environment and Behavior 43 (2): 252–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Esther M., and Matthew A. Wilson. 2006. “Neuroscience and Architecture: Seeking Common Ground.” Cell 127 (2): 239–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sussman, Ann, and Justin B. Hollander. 2014. Cognitive Architecture: Designing for how we Respond to the Built Environment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, Ann, and J. Ward. 2019. “Eye-tracking Boston City Hall to Better Understand Human Perception and the Architectural Experience.” New Design Ideas 3 (1): 53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, I-Chun, Yu-Ping Tsai, Ying-Ju Lin, Jyh-Horng Chen, Chao-Hsien Hsieh, Shih-Han Hung, William C. Sullivan, Hsing-Fen Tang, and Chun-Yen Chang. 2017. “Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to Analyze Brain Region Activity When Viewing Landscapes.” Landscape and Urban Planning 162: 137–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrant, Jeff, Jeremy Viczko, and Hannah Cope. 2018. “Virtual Reality for Anxiety Reduction Demonstrated by Quantitative EEG: A Pilot Study.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley, Sara, Chris Neale, Agnès Patuano, and Steve Cinderby. 2017. “Older People’s Experiences of Mobility and Mood in an Urban Environment: a Mixed Methods Approach Using Electroencephalography (EEG) and Interviews.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14 (2): 151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinio Pablo, P. L., and Helmut Leder. 2009. “Just how Stable are Stable Aesthetic Features? Symmetry.” Complexity, and the Jaws of Massive Familiarization 130: 241–250. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Tinio Pablo, P. L., Helmut Leder, and Marlies Strasser. 2011. “Image Quality and the Aesthetic Judgment of Photographs: Contrast, Sharpness, and Grain Teased Apart and put Together.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5 (2): 165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsunetsugu, Yuko, Yoshifumi Miyazaki, and Hiroshi Sato. 2005. “Visual Effects of Interior Design in Actual-Size Living Rooms on Physiological Responses." Building and Environment 40 (10): 1341–1346.
   Google Scholar
• Tvedebrink, Tenna Doktor Olsen, and Andrea Jelić. 2018. “Getting Under the (Ir) Skin: Applying Personas and Scenarios with Body-Environment Research for Improved Understanding of Users’ Perspective in Architectural Design.” Persona Studies 4 (2): 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Uttley, Jim, James Simpson, and Hussain Qasem. 2018. “Eye-Tracking in the Real World: Insights About the Urban Environment.” In Handbook of Research on Perception-Driven Approaches to Urban Assessment and Design, 368–396. IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Vannucci, Manila, Simone Gori, and Haruyuki Kojima. 2014. “The Spatial Frequencies Influence the Aesthetic Judgment of Buildings Transculturally.” Cognitive Neuroscience 5 (3-4): 143–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartanian, Oshin, Gorka Navarrete, Anjan Chatterjee, Lars Brorson Fich, Jose Luis Gonzalez-Mora, Helmut Leder, Cristián Modroño, Marcos Nadal, Nicolai Rostrup, and Martin Skov. 2015. “Architectural Design and the Brain: Effects of Ceiling Height and Perceived Enclosure on Beauty Judgments and Approach-Avoidance Decisions.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 41: 10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartanian, O., G. Navarrete, A. Chatterjee, L. B. Fich, H. Leder, C. Modroño, and M. Skov. 2013. “Impact of Contour on Aesthetic Judgments and Approach-Avoidance Decisions in Architecture.” (-0027-8424 (Print); - 1091-6490 (Electronic)).
   Google Scholar
• Vecchiato, Giovanni, Gaetano Tieri, Andrea Jelic, Federico De Matteis, Anton G. Maglione, and Fabio Babiloni. 2015. “Electroencephalographic Correlates of Sensorimotor Integration and Embodiment During the Appreciation of Virtual Architectural Environments.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayan, Vickram Thevar, and Mohamed Rashid Embi. 2019. “Probing Phenomenological Experiences Through Electroencephalography Brainwave Signals in Neuroarchitecture Study.” International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability 6 (3): 11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welchman, Andrew E., Arne Deubelius, Verena Conrad, Heinrich H. Bülthoff, and Zoe Kourtzi. 2005. “3D Shape Perception from Combined Depth Cues in Human Visual Cortex.” Nature Neuroscience 8 (6): 820–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, Piotr, Norbert Schwarz, and Andrzej Nowak. 2002. “Affect and Processing Dynamics Perceptual fluency Enhances Evaluations.” Emotional Cognition: From Brain to Behaviour 44: 111.
   Google Scholar
• Yanulevskaya, Victoria, Jasper Uijlings, Elia Bruni, Andreza Sartori, Elisa Zamboni, Francesca Bacci, David Melcher, and Nicu Sebe. 2012. In the Eye of the Beholder: Employing Statistical Analysis and Eye Tracking for Analyzing Abstract Paintings. Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on multimedia, pp. 349–358.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, Heath, Brent Chamberlain, Greg Norman, and William H. Hsu. 2017. Arousal Detection for Biometric Data in Built Environments Using Machine Learning. IJCAI 2017 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Affective Computing, pp. 58–72. PMLR.
   Google Scholar
• Zabcikova, Martina. 2019. “Visual and Auditory Stimuli Response, Measured by Emotiv Insight Headset.” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 292, p. 01024. EDP Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, Robert B. 1968. “Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 (2p2): 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeisel, John. 2006. Inquiry by Design: Environment/Behavior/Neuroscience in Architecture, Interiors, Landscape, and Planning, edited by forwarded by John P. Eberhard. Revised ed. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, Zhihong, Maja Pantic, Glenn I. Roisman, and Thomas S. Huang. 2009. “A Survey of Affect Recognition Methods: Audio, Visual, and Spontaneous Expressions.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31 (1): 39–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Lelin, Joachim Gossmann, Cory Stevenson, Michael Chi, Gert Cauwenberghs, Klaus Gramann, Jurgen Schulze, Peter Otto, Tzyy-Ping Jung, and Randy Peterson. 2011. Spatial Cognition and Architectural Design in 4d Immersive Virtual Reality: Testing Cognition with a Novel Audiovisual Cave-Cad Tool. Proceedings of the Spatial Cognition for Architectural Design Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Xi, Zhiwei Lian, and Yong Wu. 2017. “Human Physiological Responses to Wooden Indoor Environment.” Physiology & Behavior 174: 27–34. doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.02.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar