Three Decades of Research on Child Art: A Survey and a Critique

References

• The author would like to acknowledge Donn Evans, doctoral candidate at The Ohio State University, whose Comprehensive Examination (May, 1976) served as an excellent check on a number of the studies that are discussed, and express appreciation to Robert Saunders who helped clarify some historical trouble-spots in the text.
   Google Scholar
• Alschuler & L. Hattwick. Painting and Personality: A Study of Young Children, U. of Chicago Press, 1947.
   Google Scholar
• Alschuler & L. Hattwick. “Easel Painting as an Index of Personality,” (reprinted in) Readings in Art Education, E. W. Eisner & D. W. Ecker (ed.)
   Google Scholar
• R. Arnheim. Art and Visual Perception, U. of Calif. Press: Berkeley, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• F. Barron. “Complexity-Simplicity as a Personality Dimension,” (reprinted in) Readings in Art Education, op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• K. Beittel. Effect of Self-Reflective Training in Art on the Capacity for Creative Action, mimeo, Penn. State U., 1964.
   Google Scholar
• K. Beittel & R. Burkhart. “Strategies of Spontaneous, Divergent, and Academic Art Students,” (reprinted in) Readings in Art Education, op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• A. Efland. “Changing Views of Children's Artistic Development: Their Impact on Curriculum and Instruction,” The Arts, Human Development and Education, E. Eisner (ed.), McCutchan: Calif., 1976, in press.
   Google Scholar
• A. Efland. “The School Art Style: A Functional Analysis,” Studies in Art Education, 17:2, 1976, pp. 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• E. Eisner. Educating Artistic Vision. Macmillan: N.Y., 1972.
   Google Scholar
• E. Eisner & D. Ecker, (ed.) Readings in Art Education, Blaisdell: Mass., 1966.
   Google Scholar
• H. Gardner. The Perception of the Visual World, Houghton-Mifflin, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• H. Gardner. The Arts and Human Development. Wiley: N.Y., 1973.
   Google Scholar
• C. Golomb. “The Child as Image-Maker: The Invention of Representational Models and the Effects of the Medium,” Studies in Art Education, 17:2, 1976, pp. 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• E. Gombrich. Art and Illusion, Princeton U. Press: N.J., 1960.
   Google Scholar
• F. Goodenough. “The Psychological Interpretation of Children's Drawings,” (reprinted in) Readings in Art Education, op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• F. Goodenough. Measurement of Intelligence by Drawing, Harcourt, Brace & World: N.Y., 1954.
   Google Scholar
• C. Hall & V. Nordby. A Primer of Jungian Psychology, Mentor: N.Y., 1973.
   Google Scholar
• R. Kellogg. Analyzing Children's Art, N.P.P.: Calif., 1969.
   Google Scholar
• V. Lanier. “The Future of Art Education, or Tiptoe Through the Tea Leaves,” Art Education, March, 1976, pp. 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• V. Lanier. “A Plague on All Your Houses: The Tragedy of Art Education,” Art Education, March, 1974, pp. 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• H. Lewis. “Peregrinations in Child Art,” Studies in Art Education, 17:2, 1976, pp. 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• J. Lovano-Kerr. “The Relation of Conceptual Style and Modes of Perception to Graphic Expression,” Studies in Art Education, Sp. 1970, pp. 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• V. Lowenfeld. Creative and Mental Growth (3rd edition), Macmillan: N.Y., 1957.
   Google Scholar
• V. Lowenfeld. “Tests for Visual and Haptic Attitudes,” (reprinted in) Readings in Art Education, op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• J. McFee. Preparation for Art, Wadsworth: Calif., 1961.
   Google Scholar
• H. McWhinnie. “A Review of Recent Literature in Perceptual/Cognitive Style with Implications for Theory and Research in Art Education,” Studies in Art Education, Sp. 1970, pp. 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• N. Meier. “Factors in Artistic Aptitude: Final Summary of a Ten-Year Study of a Special Ability,” (reprinted in) Readings in Art Education, op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• C. Qualley. “A Comparison of Spontaneous and Divergent Strategies to Historical Analyses of Style,” Studies in Art Education, 12:1, 1970, pp. 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• H. Read. Education Through Art, Pantheon: N.Y., 1958.
   Google Scholar
• H. Read. The Grass Roots of Art, Meridian: N.Y., 1961.
   Google Scholar
• M. Rouse. “A Comparison of Witkin's Field-Independence Dimension and Lowenfeld's Visual-Haptic Theory,” (unpublished) doctoral dissertation, Stanford U.: Calif., 1963.
   Google Scholar
• R. Salome. (book review) Child Art: The Beginnings of Self-Affirmation, H. Lewis (ed.), Diablo Press: Calif., 1966; reviewed in Studies in Art Education, Aut. 1966, pp. 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• C. Wieder. “Alternative Approaches to Problems in Art Education,” Studies in Art Education, Aut. 1975, pp. 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• B. Wilson. “Child Art and Art Education” (guest editorial), Studies in Art Education, 17:2, 1976, pp. 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• B. Wilson. “Little Julian's Impure Drawings: Why Children Make Art,” ibid., pp. 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• B. Wilson. “The Superheroes of J.C. Holz Plus an Outline of a Theory of Child Art,” Art Education, 27:8, 1974, pp. 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• H. Witkin. Psychological Differentiation, Wiley: N.Y., 1962.
   Google Scholar
• H. Wolfflin. Principles of Art History, Dover: N.Y., 1932.
   Google Scholar