Why Study Classroom Art Talk?

References

• Barkan, M (1962). Transitions in art education: Changing conceptions of curriculum and teaching. Art Education, 15 (7).
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paid.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D., and Todd, F. (1995). Communication and learning revisited: Making meaning through talk. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton, Cook Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, T. (1991). Descriptions in professional art criticism. Studies In Art Education, 32 (2), 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Brimer, J.J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C.B. (1988) Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NJ: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, C. (1994). Thinking in art: A philosophical approach to art education. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (1988). The role of discipline-based art education in America's schools. Los Angeles, CA: The J. Paul Getty Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Efland, A (1976). 'The school art style: A functional analysis. Studies In Art Education, 17 (2), 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Efland, A. (1990). A history of art education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. (1998). Effects of history instruction or fourth and eighth grade students abilities to interpret artworks contextually. Studies in Art Education, 39 (4), 309–320.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. (1994). Evidence of historical interpretation referred to by young people and adults. Studies in Art Education, 35 (2), 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, E.B. (1987). Varieties of visual experience (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Geahigan, G. (1998). Critical inquiry: Understanding the concept and applying it in the classroom. Art Education, 51 (5), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Geahigan, G. (1999). Models of critical discourse and classroom instruction: A critical examination. Studies in Art Education, 41 (1), 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, R. (1994). A student centered approach for understanding art. Art Education, 47 (5), 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kakas, K. M. (1991). Classroom communication during fifth grade students' drawing lesson: Student-student and student-teacher conversations. Studies in Art Education, 33 (1), 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Koroscik, J. S., Short, G., Stavropoulos, C. & Fortin, S. (1992). Frameworks for understanding art: The function of comparative art contexts and verbal cues. Studies in Art Education, 33 (3), 154–164.
   Google Scholar
• Koroscik, J. S. (1997). Who ever said studying art would be easy? The growing cognitive demands of understanding works of art in the information age. Studies in Art Education, 38(1), 4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Koroscik, J.S., Osman, A.H. and DeSouza, I. (1988). The function of verbal mediation in comprehending works of art: A comparison of three cultures. Studies in Art Education, 29 (2), 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y. (1993). Professional criticism in the secondary classroom: Opposing judgments of contemporary art enhance the teaching of art criricism. Art Education, 46 (3), 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning, and values. (Judith Green, Ed.), Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Leshnoff, S. K. (1995). Art, ambiguity and critical thinking. Art Education, 48 (5), 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• NAEA News (1998, April). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• National standards for arts education: What every young American should know and be able to do in the arts (1994) Reston, VA: Music Education National Conference (MENC) Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M.J. (1987) How we understand art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Random House College Dictionary (1982). New York: Random House, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Soep, E. and Cotner, T (1999). Speaking the mind and minding the speech: Novices interpreting art. Studies in Art Education, 40 (4), 350–372.
   Google Scholar
• Visual and performing arts framework for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve (1996). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. (1996). Thinking strategies for interpreting artworks. Studies in Art Education, 37 (2), 80–91.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (1997). The quiet evolution, Los Angeles, CA: The Getty Education Institute for the Ails.
   Google Scholar
• Whorf, B. L. (1956) Language, thought, and reality. (J. B. Carroll, Ed.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar