Multiple Intelligences at the Middle Level: Models for Learning in Art and across the Disciplines

References

• Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences in the classroom, Baltimore: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
   Google Scholar
• Berger, R. (1993) Expeditionary learning in the classroom, One teacher's view. An interview with Ron Berger by Emily Cousins. Outward Bound, Volume 1, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, R. (1996) A culture of quality. Annenberg Institute for School Reform. Occasional Paper Series. #1. Providence, RI: Brown University.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (1997). The “u” and the wheel of “c:” Development and devaluation of graphic symbolization and the cognitive approach at Harvard Project Zero, in Child development in art, Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. (1979). Drawing on the right side of the brain, Los Angeles: Tarcher.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E., & Gardner, H. et al, (1983). Art Education, Vol. 36, No.2.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (1998). Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement? Art Education, 51(1) 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner et al, (1997) Teaching for multiple intelligences, Educational Leadership, 55(1).
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1999), Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gitomer, D. (1989), Developing a portfolio culture that enables learners. Paper presented at the 1989 National Summit Conference on the Arts and Education, The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Gitomer, D., Grosh, S., & Price, K. (1992). In Portfolio culture in arts education. Art Education, 45(1), 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. and Hoepfner, R. (1971). The analysis of intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Henley, D. (1997). The art of disturbation: Provocation and censorship in art education. Art Education, 50(3), 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Herrnstein, R. and Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantner, L. (1989). Visual arts education and multiple intelligences: Before implementation; Colbert, C. Visual Arts: Multiple Ways of Knowing, in W. Moody (1989). Artistic intelligences: Implications for education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, R. (1999–2000). Initiation—Saying good-bye to childhood. Educational Leadership, 57 (4) 30–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornhaber, M. (2000). Project SUMIT, report on Harvard Project Zero web site (pzweb.harvard.edu).
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemann, N. (1993, August). The structure of success in America. The Atlantic Monthly, 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J. (1983). Art and adolescence. Teaching art at the secondary level. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, W. (1989). Artistic intelligences: Implications for education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U., (Ed.), (1998). The rising curve. Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. J. (1998). Integrated curriculum and our paradigm of cognition in the arts. Studies in Art Education, 39(2), 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget J. and Lnhelder, B. (1967). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. and Salomon, G. (1988) Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, 46(1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiff, J. C. (1997), Spring). Multiple intelligences, culture and equitable learning. Childhood Education, 301–304.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, R. (1982). The Lowenfeld motivation. Art Education, 34.(6). 47–49.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. et al, (1998). Creating meaning through art. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement New York: Macmillan; and (1903) General Intelligence Objectively Determined and Measured, The American Journal of Psychology 15, 201–293.
   Google Scholar
• Thurston, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs 1938, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, E., & Rosenblatt, E. (1989). Tracking the effects of the portfolio process: What changes and when? Portfolio: The Newsletter of Arts PROPEL, I (5). Cambridge: Harvard Project Zero, 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E. (1992). Arts PROPEL: An introductory handbook. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service and the President and Fellows of Harvard College.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E., & Simmons, S. (1992). Arts PROPEL: A handbook for visual arts. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service and the President and Fellows of Harvard College.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, D.P. (1992). Assessment as an episode of learning. In R. E. Bennett & W. W. Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement, Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, P. (1997). A really good art teacher would be like you, Mrs. C.: A qualitative study of a teacher and her artistically gifted middle school students. Studies in Art Education, 38(4), 232–245.
   Google Scholar
• Zessoules, R. Wolf, D.P., & Gardner, H (1988). A better balance: Arts PROPEL as an alternative to Discipline-Based Arts Education. In J. Burton, A. Lederman, & P. London (Eds.), Beyond DBAE: The case for multiple visions of art education. University Council on Art Education.
   Google Scholar