![Experts in next day delivery. Before the bell rings.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112415/JournalAd-UARE-Staples.gif"})
References
- Danto, A. (1992). Beyond the Brillo Box: The visual arts in post-historical perspective. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
- Duncum, P. (2002). Theorizing everyday aesthetic experience with contemporary visual culture. Visual Arts Research, 28(2), pp. 4–15.
- Efland, A. (1988). How art became a discipline: Looking at our recent history. Studies in Art Education. 29(3) 264–274.
- Freedman, K. (1997). Critiquing the media: Art knowledge inside and outside the school. Art Education, 39(4), 46–51.
- Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. (2004). Curriculum change for the 21st Century: Visual culture in art, education. In E. Eisner and M. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 815–828). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
- Gablik, S. (1984). Has modernism failed? New York: Thames & Hudson.
- Johnson, J. (2002). Who needs classical music: Cultural choice and musical value. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Harpham, G. H. (1994). Aesthetics and the fundamentals of modernity. In G. Levine (Ed.), Aesthetics and ideology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Tavin, K. (2001). Swimming up-stream in the jean pool: Developing a pedagogy towards critical citizenship in visual culture. Journal of Social Theory in Art Education Vol. 21, pp. 129–158.
- Tavin, K. (2005). Hauntological shifts: Fear and loathing of popular (visual) culture. Studies in Art Education, 46(2), 101–117.