70
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Instructional Resources

Searching for Meaning: Visual Culture from an Anthropological Perspective

Pages 46-54 | Published online: 21 Dec 2015

References

  • Ball, W.M. (1997). Understanding what we see: Subject, author, and audience in visual anthropology. Retrieved December 21,2004 from http://www.criticaldesign.com/anthropo/visanth/visanth.htm
  • Beittel, K. (1973). Alternatives for art education research. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
  • Bresler, L., & Thompson, C. (2002). The arts in children's lives: Context, culture and curriculum. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Chalfen, R. (1981). A sociovidistic approach to children's filmmaking:The Philadephia project. Studies in Visual Communication, 7(1), 2–32.
  • Colbert, C. (1996). Issues of gender in the visual arts arts education of young children. In G. Collins & R. Sandell (Eds.). Gender issues in art education (pp. 60–69). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
  • Denzin, N. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dissanayake, E. (1988) What is art for? Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
  • Duncum, P., & Bracey, T. (Eds.). (2001). On knowing: Art and visual culture. Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury University Press: University of Canterbury.
  • Freedman, K (2003). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art. NAEA: Reston, VA.
  • Garber, E. (2005). Social justice and art education. Visual Arts Research, 30(2), 4–22.
  • Gergen, K.J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275.
  • Giroux, H., & Simon, R. (1989). Popular culture, schooling, and everyday life. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
  • Graue, M.J., & Walsh, D.J. (1998). Studying children in context. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Harter, S. (1999). The construction of self. New York: Guilford.
  • Hickman, C. (1991). Kid Pix studio deluxe. User's guide. Novato, CA: Broderbund Software.
  • Lowenfeld, V. (1952/1939). The nature of creative activity (2nd ed., O. A. Oeser, Trans.). New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.
  • Ruby, J. (2004). Visual anthropology. Retrieved December 21, 2004 from http://astro.temple.edu/~ruby/ruby/cultanthro.html
  • Stokrocki, M. (1982). A review of the Lowenfeld lectures, Art Education, 35(6), 42–43.
  • Stokrocki, M. (1985). Photographic analysis, elicitation, and interpretation as ways of understanding art education in a subculture, Journal of Multicultural and Cross-cultural Research in Art Education, 3(1), 56–64. Reprinted in SVA News: The Society for Visual Anthropology, 4(1), 9–12.
  • Stokrocki, M. (1994). Through Navajo children's eyes: Cultural influences on representational abilities. Visual Anthropology, 7, 47–67.
  • Stokrocki, M. (1997). Qualitative forms of research methods. In S. D. La Pierre, & E. Zimmerman (Eds.). Research methods and methodologies for art education (pp. 33–56). Reston, VA: NAEA.
  • Stokrocki, M, with Coutinho, R. (2000). Sociocultural influences on Brazilian children's drawing. Art Education, 53(1), 12–17.
  • Stokrocki, M., with Buckpitt, M. (2002). Computer animation at an Apache middle school:Apache children's use of computer animation technology. In Y. Gaudelius, & P. Speirs (Eds.). Contemporary issues in art education for elementary educators (pp. 264–274). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Stokrocki, M. (2004). Contexts for teaching art. In E. Eisner & M. Day (Eds). Teaching and teacher education handbook on research and policy in art education (pp. 439–466). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Stokrocki, M., with Kivatinetz, M., Lopez, E., Hernandez, F., & Macian, J. (2005). A constructivist study of an interdisciplinary visual culture unit—Re-invent yourself in a Barcelona secondary school. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1983). Themes for graphic narratives of American, Australian, Egyptian, and Finnish children:Tales from four cultures. Journal of Multicultural and Cross-cultural Research in Art Education, 11, 63–76.
  • Wilson, B. (2004). Child art after modernism:Visual culture and new narratives. In E. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.). Teaching and teacher education handbook on research and policy in art education (pp. 299–328). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Worth, S., & Adair, J. (1972). Through Navaho eyes. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.