![Experts in next day delivery. Before the bell rings.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112415/JournalAd-UARE-Staples.gif"})
References
- Ballengee-Morris, C., & Stuhr, P. L. (2001). Multicultural art and visual cultural education in a changing world. Art Education, 54(4), 1–7.
- Bastos, F. M.C., & Ross, M. (2005). Dialogical perspectives: Subjectivity in art education inquiry. In R. E. Clark & M. Stokrocki (Eds.), New waves of research in art education. Seminar for Research in Art Education.
- Bretell, R. R. (1999). Modern art 1851–1929: Capitalism and representation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Davenport, M. (2000). Culture and education: Polishing the lenses. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), 361–375.
- Delahunt, M. R. (2003). “Vernacular architecture.” Artlex. Retrieved June 25, 2003 from http://www.artlex.com
- Humstone, M. (1998). “They saved a landmark barn.” Successful farming online. Retrieved April 24, 2002, from http://www.agriculture.com
- Johnson, L. (2002). Art-centered approach to diversity education in teaching and learning. Multicultural Art Education, 9(4), 18–21.
- McKay, S. W., & Monteverde, S. R. (2003). Dialogic looking: Beyond the mediated experience. Art Education, 56(1), 40–45.
- Scott, A., Krug, D., & Stuhr, P. (1995). A conversation about translating the indigenous history. Journal of Multicultural and Cross-cultural Research in Art Education, 13, 33–48.
- Stuhr, P. L. (2003). A tale of why social and cultural content is often excluded form art education and why it should not be. Studies in Art Education, 44(4), 301–134.
- Turnbull, C. M. (1986). Sex, and gender: The role of subjectivity in field research. In T. L. Whitehead & M. E. Conaway (Eds.), Self, sex, and gender in cross-cultural fieldwork. (pp. 17–27). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.