References
- Carpenter, B. S. (2005). Disciplines, boundaries, and bridges. Art Education, 58 (4), p. 4.
- Eisner, E.W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
- Grace, M. (1999). When students create curriculum. Educational Leadership: The_Constructivist Classroom, 57 (3). pp. 52–52. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://falcon.tamucc.edu/~mgrace/m_grace/ASCDarticle.html
- In TIME: Integrating New Technologies Into the Methods of Education (2006). Students at the center of their own learning. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://www.intime.uni.edu/model/center_of_learning_files/principles.html
- Irwin, R. L., & de Cosson, A. (Eds.). (2004). A/r/tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry, Vancouver, BC: Pacific-Educational Press.
- McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2004). Understanding by design: Professional development workbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Prawat, R. S. (1999). Dewey, Peirce, and the learning paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 36 (1), pp. 47–76.
- Stewart, M. G. & Walker, S. R. (2005). Rethinking curriculum in art. Worcester, MA: Davis Publications, Inc.
- Sullivan L. (1956). The autobiography of an idea. New York: Dover Publications.
- The Gardner School (2006). Emergent curriculum. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://www.gardnerschool.org/emergentcurriculum.html
- Wilson, B. (1997). The second search: Metaphor, dimensions of meaning, and research in art education. In La Pierre, S. and Zimmerman, E. (Eds.) Research methods and methodology for art education, (pp. 1–32) Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.