Shaking the Foundations of Postsecondary Art(ist) Education in Visual Culture

References

• Barrett, T. (2006). Approaches to postmodern art making. FATE in Review, 28, 2–15.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, C. (1996). Breaking with the past: Rethinking the mission of art schools in the next century. FATE in Review, 23, 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, S. (2003). Foundations survey results. Retrieved February 2, 2007 from http://faculty.weber.edu/sjbetz/webmechanicsfolder/foundationsurvhome.html.
   Google Scholar
• Brosterman, N., & Togashi, K. (1997). Inventing kindergarten. New York: H. N. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, D. (2007) Untitled: Higher Education Division column. NAEA News, 49, 1, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, B. S., & Tavin, K. (in press). Art education beyond reconceptualization: Enacting curriculum through/with/by/for/of/in/beyond visual culture, Community and Public Pedagogy. In E. Malewski (Ed.), The curriculum studies reader: The next moment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Catterall, K. M., & Nugent, H. M. (Spring 1999). W.A.R.P: A radical solution to teaching foundations. Art Journal, 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, L. H. (1982). Instant art, instant culture. The unspoken policy for American schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. (2002). ReBoot: Fresh manifesto for foundations. FATE in Review, 24, 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, S. S. (2005). Cows in the clouds and potato chip heads: Reflections on narrative, interpretation, and the first year experience. FATE in Review, 27, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dockery, C., & Quinn, R. D. (2006). Finding balance in contemporary foundations programs. FATE in Review, 28, 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, P. (Ed.). (2006). Visual culture in the art class: Case studies. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Efland, A., Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. (1996). Postmodern art education: An approach to curriculum. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fendrich, L. (2005, June 3). A portrait of the artist as a young mess. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Findeli, A. (1990). Moholy-Nagy's design pedagogy in Chicago (1937-46). Design Issues, 7 (1), 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fouquet, M. (2004). Art school and interdisciplinarity: Developing foundation as a shared space. Paper presented at The College Art Association Conference, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, C. (1996). Teaching art: Academies and schools from Vasari to Albers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gude, O. (2004). Postmodern principles: In search of a 21st century art education. Art Education, 57 (1), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gude, O. (2007). Principles of possibility: Considerations for a 21st-century art & culture curriculum. Art Education, 60 (1), 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (1997). Conceptual skills and studio practice in the first year course. FATE in Review, 20, 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, L. (2006/2007). 100 interesting things: A foundations-level search for content and meaning. FATE in Review, 28, 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Larmann, R. M. (1997). Using the World Wide Web as an art foundations teaching tool. FATE in Review, 19, 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. (Ed.). (1970). The arts on campus: The necessity for change. Greenwich, CT: New York Graphic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, C. S. (1995). Issues in art now as part of foundation studies. FATE in Review, 17, 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, S. (2000). Curricular change and institutional context: Reconsidering the contradictions. FATE in Review, 23, 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Pevsner, N. (1973). Academies of art, past and present. New York: Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shipps, S. (2004). Theory as foundation. Paper presented at The College Art Association Conference, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Singerman, H. (1999). Art Subjects: Making artists in the American university. University of California Press: Berkeley and Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P. R. (2000). Seduced by mercury: The dangers and promises of new technologies for teaching. FATE in Review, 23, 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Stensaas, S. (1999). The work of art in the age of digital reproduction. FATE in Review, 22, 36.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M., & Walker, S. (2005). Rethinking curriculum in art. Worcester, MA: Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Tavin, K. (2003). Wrestling with angels, searching for ghosts: Toward a critical pedagogy of visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 44 (3), 197–213.
   Google Scholar
• Tavin, K. (2007) Eyes wide shut: The use and uselessness of the discourse of aesthetics in art education. Art Education, 60 (2), 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., Carpenter, B. S., Ballengee-Morris, C., & Sessions, B. (2006). Interdisciplinary approaches to teaching art in high school. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. (2001). Teaching meaning in artmaking. Worcester, MA: Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Whitford, F. (1994). Bauhaus. London: Phaidon.
   Google Scholar
• Whitford, F., & Cave, J. (2004). Bauhaus. Princeton, NJ: Films for the Humanities & Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (2000). The parable of the para-site that ate art education. Journal of Multicultural and Cross-Cultural Research in Art Education, 18, 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wittenbraker, P. (2002). Preparing the new visualist: Visual knowledge, progression, and contextual understanding in foundation studies. FATE in Review, 24, 29–37.
   Google Scholar