References
- Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books Publishers.
- Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Davis, B. (1988). Image learning: Higher education and interactive video disc. Teachers College Record, 89(3), 352–359.
- DeLappe, J., & Schreiber, R. (1998, February). New! newer! newest! Teaching new media. New Art Examiner, 25(5).
- Dooling, J. O., (2000, October). What students want to learn about computers. Educational Leadership, 20–24.
- Drucker, J. (1997, Fall). The virtualization of art practice: Body knowledge and the engineering world-view. CAA Art Journal, 1–11.
- Druckery, T. (Ed.). (1996). Electronic culture: Technology and visual representation. Aperture Foundation, Ontario, Canada: General Publishing.
- Druckery, T. (Ed.). (1999). Art electronica: Facing the future, a survey of two decades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Gardner, H. (2006). Theory of multiple intelligences, Retrieved on Wednesday, June 7, 2006, from http://www.infed.org/thinkers/gardner.htm
- Garvin, D. A. (2003, September-October). Making the case: Profession education for the world of practice. Harvard Magazine, p. 56.
- Hanhardt, J. G. (Ed.). (1986). Video culture: A critical investigation. Layton, Utah: Gibbs M. Smith, Peregrine Smith Books, Visual Studies Workshop Press.
- Hanhardt, J. G. (1989). Film and video: In the age of television. Image world: Art and media culture. New York: Whitney Museum of Art.
- Heylighen, F. (1997, February 17). Cybernetics. Principa cybernetica. Retrieved on September 13, 2003 from http://pespmcl.vub.ac.be/CYBERN.html.
- Johnson, S. (1997). How new technology transforms the way we create & communicate: Interface culture. New York: Basic Books.
- Leavitt, R. (1976). Artist and computer. Morristown, NJ: Creative Computing Press.
- Lee, J. (2002, September 19). I think, therefore IM: Text shortcuts invade schoolwork, and teachers are not amused. The New York Times, Circuits.
- Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, Gen Xers, and Millennial: Understanding the new students. Educause Review, p. 37–47.
- Spalter, A. M. (1999). The computer in the visual arts. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
- Sullivan, G. (1993). Art-based art education Learning that is meaningful, authentic, critical and pluralist. Studies in Art Education, 35(1), 5–21.
- Sullivan, G. (2004a). Studio art as research practice. In E. W. Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 795–814). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Sullivan, G. (2004b). Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in the Visual Arts. Unpublished manuscript, Teachers College.
- Traub, C. H. & Lipkin, J. (1998). If we are digital: Crossing the boundaries. Leonardo. 31(5), 363–366.
- Wallis, C. (2006, March 19). The multitasking generation, Time Magazine, pp. 9–9. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1174696,00.html
- Wilson, B. G. (1996). Constructivist Learning Environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
- Wilson, S. (2002). Information Arts: Intersections of art, science, and technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Zajong, Arthur G. (1984). Computer pedagogy? Questions concerning the new educational technology. Teachers College Record, 85(4), 569–577.