The trouble with Contemporary Art is …

References

• Anderson, R. L., & Field, K. L. (1993) Art in small-scale societies: Contemporary readings. Englewood Cliffs, N): Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, T. (2008). Why is that art? Aesthetics and criticism of contemporary art. New York: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Controversial chocolate Jesus exhibit cancelled. (2007, March 31). Retrieved April 20, 2007, from http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/30/chocolate.jesus.ap/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J., & Gardner, H. (2000). Symbolic literacies: The developmental portrait research has produced. In R. S. Smith (Ed), Readings in discipline-based art education: A literature of educational reform (pp. 257–263). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. (2002). What are artworlds and why are they important? In M. Erickson and B. Young (Eds.), Multicultural artworlds: Enduring, evolving and overlapping traditions (pp. 17–25). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M., & Clover, F. (2003). Viewpoints for art understanding. Translations, 12 (1), n.p. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M., & Young, B. (2002). Multicultural artworlds: Enduring, evolving and overlapping traditions. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universali in cognitive development. Norwood: N): Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. H. (1987). Developmental psychology and art education: Two fields at the crossroads. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 2 (2), 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gude, O. (2004). Postmodern principles: An infinite amount of time is wasted in misdirected efforts because tradition has a strong hold. Art Education, 57 (1), 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Housen, A. (1983). The eye of the beholder: Measuring aesthetic development. Ed. D Dissertation, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Housen, A. (2000). Museums in an age of pluralism. In R. S. Smith (Ed), Readings in discipline-based art education: A literature of educational reform (pp. 287–294). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jim, A., Smith, K., Whitethorne, B., Nez, R., Begay, S., Singer, E., Isaacs, F., Walters Sr, R., Tso, F., & Peaches, D. (1997, February). Art. Talking Circle conducted at Greyhills Academy High School, Tuba City, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. (2005). Editorial: Technology interfaces with art education. Visual Arts Education, 3 (1), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Korosik, I. S. (1997). What potential do young people have to understand works of art? In A. M. Kindler (Ed.), Child development in art (pp. 143–163). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. J. (1987a). How wc understand art: A cognitive account of the development of aesthetic understanding. New York: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. J. (1987b). Talk about a painting: A cognitive developmental analysis. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 2 (1), 37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. J., & Blocker, H. G. (1993). Aesthetics and education. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Soganci, I. O. (2005). Mom, why isn't there a picture of our prophet? International Journal of Education through Art, 1 (1), 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Villeneuve, P., & Erickson, M. (2006). A taxonomy of understanding: Reflective art response and issues arising from the teaching of religious art. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education, 24, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (2003). Of diagrams and rhizomes: Visual culture, contemporary art, and the impossibility of mapping the content of art education. Studies in Art Education, 44 (3), 214–229.
   Google Scholar