Steam as Social Practice: Cultivating Creativity in Transdisciplinary Spaces

References

• American Society for Engineering Education [ASEE]. (1994). The green report: Engineering education for a changing world. Retrieved from www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/The-Green-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baillee, C., & Catalano, G. (2009). Engineering and society: Working towards social justice [Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology and Society series]. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. (2011). Blue revolution: Unmaking America’s water crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bequette, J., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Boix Mansilla, V., Miller, W. C., & Gardner, H. (2000). On disciplinary lenses and interdisciplinary work. In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman (Eds.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges to implementation (pp. 17–38). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics (Esthetique relationnelle). (S. Pleasance, F. Woods & M. Copeland, Trans.). Paris, France: Les Presses du Réel.
   Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colledge, T. H. (2012). Convergence: Philosophies and pedagogies for developing the next generation of humanitarian engineers and social entrepreneurs. State College, PA: International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Costantino, T., Kellam, N. N., Cramond, B., & Crowder, I. (2010). An interdisciplinary design studio: How can art and engineering collaborate to increase students’ creativity. Art Education, 63(2), 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Pedigree Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gablik, S. (1991). The reenchantment of art. London, England: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Gause, D. C., & Weinberg, G. M. (1990). Are your lights on?: How to figure out what the problem really is. New York, NY: Dorset House.
   Google Scholar
• Gude, O. (2013). New school art styles: The project of art education. Art Education, 66(1), 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. E., Jr., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (2009). Engineering ethics: Concepts & cases (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2013). Studio thinking 2: The real benefits of visual arts education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press; and Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Holley, K. A. (2009). Understanding interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 35(2), 1–131.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellam, N. N., Costantino, T., & Cramond, B. (2009). The impacts of an interdisciplinary design studio on creativity. Paper presented at the Creativity and Innovation Symposium, Winston-Salem, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Kellam, N. N., Walther, J., Costantino, T., & Cramond, B. (2013). Integrating the engineering curriculum through the synthesis and design studio. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(3), 256–270.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maeda, J. (2013). STEM + Art = STEAM. The STEAM Journal, 1(1), 1–3. DOI: 10.5642/steam.201301.34
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering [NAE]. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, D., Pawley, A. L., Tucker, J., & Catalano, G. D. (2009). Feminisms in engineering education: Transformative possibilities. NWSA Journal, 21(2), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. T. (2007). Policy Area—The reflexive engineer: Perceptions of integrated development. Journal of International Development, 19(9), 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Rojter, J. (2006). Engineering profession as a social practice: Impact on professional engineering education. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 2(7), 135–140.
   Google Scholar
• Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The 13 thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. New York, NY: Mariner Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sabochik, K. (2010, September 16). Changing the equation in STEM education [web log post]. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/09/16/changing-equation-stem-education
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, T., & Harris, J. (2012). Toward a STEM + arts curriculum: Creating the teacher team. Art Education, 65(5), 42–47.
   Google Scholar