Social Interaction Location Choice: A Latent Class Modeling Approach

References

• Appleyard, D., and M. Lintel. 1972. The environmental quality of city streets: The residents’ viewpoint. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 38 (2): 84–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arentze, T.A., and H.J. P. Timmermans. 2008. Social networks, social interactions, and activity-travel behavior: A framework for microsimulation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35 (6): 1012–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boase, J., J. Horrigan, B. Wellman, and L. Rainie. 2006. The strength of Internet ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media/Files/Reports/2006/PIP_Internet_ties.pdf.pdf (last accessed 11 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. 2002. The neighborhood and social networks. Paper No. 4, Centre for Neighbourhood Research, Bristol, UK. http://www.neighbourhoodcentre.org.uk (last accessed 4 July 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Carrasco, J., B. Hogan, B. Wellman, and E. Miller. 2008. Collecting social network data to study social activity-travel behavior: An egocentric approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35 (6): 961–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, J.A., and E.J. Miller. 2006. Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: A social networks approach. Transportation 33 (5): 463–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, V., N. Dines, W. Gesler, and S. Curtis. 2008. Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health & Place 14 (3): 544–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, N., C. Brown, and G. Bramley. 2012. The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. Progress in Planning 77 (3): 89–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijst, M. 1999. Action space as planning concept in spatial planning. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 14 (2): 163–82.
   Google Scholar
• Dijst, M. 2009. ICT and social networks: Towards a situational perspective on the interaction between corporeal and connected presence. In The expanding sphere of travel behaviour research, ed. R. Kitamura, T. Yoshii, and T. Yamamoto, 45–76. New York: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Dugundji, E.R., A. Páez, T.A. Arentze, and J.L. Walker, with contributions from, J.A. Carrasco, F. Marchal, and H. Nakanishi. 2011. Transportation and social interactions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 45 (4): 239–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, S., T. Neutens, H.J. Miller, and X. Li. 2013. The social interaction potential of metropolitan regions: A time-geographic measurement approach using joint accessibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (3): 483–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, S., and A. Páez. 2009. My car, my friends, and me: A preliminary investigation of automobility and social activity participation. Journal of Transport Geography 17 (3): 216–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, S., and A. Páez. 2011. Running to stay in place: The time-use implications of automobile oriented land-use and travel. Journal of Transport Geography 19 (4): 782–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, S., A. Páez, R.G. Mercado, M. Roorda, and C. Morency. 2011. A time-use investigation of shopping participation in three Canadian cities: Is there evidence of social exclusion? Transportation 38 (1): 17–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, S., A. Paez, and C. Morency. 2012. Activity spaces and the measurement of clustering and exposure: A case study of linguistic groups in Montreal. Environment and Planning A 44 (2): 315–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., and A. Kearns. 2001. Social cohesion, social capital and the neighborhood. Urban Studies 38 (12): 2125–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J., B. Giles-Corti, L. Wood, and M. Knuiman. 2012. Creating sense of community: The role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32 (4): 401–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 2006. Life between buildings: Using public space. Skive, Denmark: Danish Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grannis, R. 1998. The importance of trivial streets: Residential streets and residential segregation. American Journal of Sociology 103 (6): 1530–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grannis, R. 2009. From the ground up: Translating geography into community through neighbor networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M.S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W.H. 2002. Nlogit version 3.0 reference guide. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, A.M., and S.K. Wierzbicki. 1999. Social ties at the neighborhood level: Two decades of GSS evidence. Urban Affairs Review 35 (1): 92–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., and P.K. Chintagunta. 1994. On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models. Journal of Marketing Research 31 (1): 128–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, A., and M. Taylor. 2000. Activity settings and travel behavior: A social contact perspective. Transportation 27 (1): 53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, P. 2013. “Third places” and social interaction in deprived neighbourhoods in Great Britain. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 28 (2): 221–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, C., A. Clark, J. Katz, and S. Peace. 2007. Social interactions in urban public places. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, F., and D. Reynolds. 1970. Action space formation: A behavioral approach to predicting urban travel behavior. Highway Research Record 322:136–48.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Jakle, J.A., S. Brunn, and C.C. Roseman. 1976. Human spatial behavior: A social geography. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Kazmierczak, A. 2013. The contribution of local parks to neighborhood social ties. Landscape and Urban Planning 109 (1): 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemperman, A.D. A. M., and H.J. P. Timmermans. 2008. Influence of socio-demographics and residential environment on leisure activity participation. Leisure Sciences 30 (4): 306–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemperman, A.D. A. M., and H.J. P. Timmermans. 2011. Green spaces, social contacts and aging. Paper presented at the RARSS Conference, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. 2007. Mobile communications, social networks, and urban travel: Hypertext as a new metaphor for conceptualizing spatial interaction. The Professional Geographer 59:434–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, K. 2004. Libraries in the USA as traditional and virtual third places. New Library World 105 (3–4): 125–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.Y., and M.-P. Kwan. 2011. Visualisation of socio-spatial isolation based on human activity patterns and social networks in space-time. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 102 (4): 468–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, H., M. Limb, and M. Taylor. 2000. The street as thirdspace: Class, gender and public space. In Children's geographies: Living, playing, learning and transforming everyday world, ed. S. Holloway and G. Valentine , 63–79.London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H.J. 2005. Necessary space–time conditions for human interaction. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32 (3): 381–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P.L., I. Salomon, and S.L. Handy. 2006. The impacts of ICT on leisure activities and travel: A conceptual exploration. Transportation 33 (3): 263–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neutens, T., S. Farber, M. Delafontaine, and K. Boussauw. 2013. Spatial variation in the potential for social interaction: A case study in Flanders (Belgium). Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 41:318–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, R. 1989. The great good place. New York: Marlow
   Google Scholar
• Pinkster, F., and B. Völker. 2009. Local social networks and social resources in two Dutch neighbourhoods. Housing Studies 24 (2): 225–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, M.S. 2006. Exploring the social supportive role of third places in consumers’ lives. Journal of Service Research 9 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, M.S., J. Ward, B.A. Walker, and A.L. Ostrom. 2007. A cup of coffee with a dash of love: An investigation of commercial social support and third-place attachment. Journal of Service Research 10 (1): 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönfelder, S., and K.W. Axhausen. 2003. Activity spaces: Measures of social exclusion? Transport Policy 10 (4): 273–86.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 1999. The social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban Studies 36 (8): 1361–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, T., M. Dijst, and T. Schwanen. 2010. Face-to-face and electronic communications in maintaining social networks: The influence of geographical and relational distance and of information content. New Media & Society 12 (6): 965–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, T., M. Dijst, and T. Schwanen. 2011. Estimating social travel demand of senior citizens in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport Geography 19 (2): 323–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, T., M. Dijst, and T. Schwanen. 2012. New ICT's and social interaction: Modelling communication frequency and communication mode choice. New Media & Society 14 (6): 987–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kempen, R., and G. Bolt. 2009. Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in The Netherlands. Journal of the Housing and the Built Environment 24 (4): 457–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Völker, B., and H. Flap. 2007. Sixteen million neighbors: A multilevel study of the role of neighbors in the personal networks of the Dutch. Urban Affairs Review 43 (2): 256–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Völker, B., H. Flap, and S. Lindenberg. 2007. When are neighbourhoods communities? Community in Dutch neighbourhoods. European Sociological Review 23 (1): 99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, K.E., A. Paez, C. Bhat, M. Moniruzzaman, and R. Paleti. 2012. T-communities and sense of community in a university town: Evidence from a student sample using a spatial ordered-response model. Urban Studies 49:1357–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, D., and S.L. Shaw. 2011. Measuring segregation: An activity space approach. Journal of Geographical Systems 13:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, P.B., and R.K. Brunson. 2011. Geographies of resilient social networks: The role of African American barbershops. Urban Geography 32 (2): 228–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar