Legal Plurality: An Analysis of Power Interplay in Mekong Hydropower

References

• Agnew, J. 1994. The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1): 53–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 2005. Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (2): 437–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahdieh, R.B. 2004. Between dialogue and decree: International review of national courts. New York University Law Review 79 (6): 2029–2163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aligica, P.D. 2006. Institutional and stakeholder mapping: Frameworks for policy analysis and institutional change. Public Organization Review 6:79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., and L. O’Dowd. 1999. Borders, border regions and territoriality: Contradictory meanings, changing significance. Regional Studies 33:593–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2009. Building a sustainable energy future. Manila, the Philippines, Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, K. 1999. The politics of hydropower: Developing the Mekong. Political Geography 18 (2): 209–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, K. 2010. Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (3): 542–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, A. 2013. Capacity building and alternative realities: Some observations on the political context of technical assistance in Lao PDR . Vientiane, Lao PDR: Laos Extension for Agriculture Project.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, P.S. 2009. The new legal pluralism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5:225–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 1999. Beyond state centrism? Space, territoriality and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society 28:39–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 1991. The extended case method. In Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis, ed. M. Buroway, 271–87. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke-White, W.W. 2004. International legal pluralism. Michigan Journal of International Law 25 (4): 963–79.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, B., and T. Halliday. 2006. Negotiating globalization: Globalization and the construction of insolvency regimes in East Asia. Law and Social Inquiry 31:521–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2003. Commodifying what nature? Progress in Human Geography 27 (3): 273–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewe, E., and E. Harrison. 1998. Whose development? An ethnography of aid. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., and A. Gupta. 2002. Spatializing states: Towards an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality? American Anthropologist 29 (4): 981–1002.
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., and J.J. Savelsberg. 2006. Introduction: Global processes, national institutions, local bricolage, shaping law in an era of globalization. Law and Social Inquiry 31 (3): 513–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanter, M. 1981. Justice in many rooms: Courts, private ordering and indigenous law. Journal of Legal Pluralism 19:1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Glassman, J. 1999. State power beyond the “territorial trap”: The internationalization of the state. Political Geography 18:669–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassman, J. 2010. Bounding the Mekong: The Asian Development Bank, China, and Thailand. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greachen, C., and A. Palettu. 2007. Electricity sector planning and hydropower. In Democratizing water governance in the Mekong region, ed. L. Lebel, J. Dore, R. Daniel, and Y.S. Koma, 93–125 . Chiang Mai, Thailand: Mekong Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, J. 1986. What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism 24:1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Heynen, N., J. McCarthy, S. Prudham, and P. Robbins. 2007. Neoliberal environments: False promises and unnatural consequences. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P. 1995. Thailand and the new geopolitics of Southeast Asia: Resource and environmental issues. In Counting the costs: Economic growth and environmental change in Thailand, ed. J. Rigg, 235–59. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P. 1996. Large dams, restructuring and regional integration in Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 37 (1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1999. Narrating the future of the national economy and the national state? Remarks on remapping regulation and reinventing governance. In State/culture: State formation after the cultural turn, ed. G. Steinmetz, 378–405. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laffont, J.J., and J. Tirole. 1991. The politics of government decision-making: A theory of regulatory capture. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1089–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, M.E., and J.L. Forrence. 1990. Regulatory capture, public interest, and the public agenda: Toward a synthesis. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 18 (6): 167–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyshon, A. 1996. Dissolving difference? Money, disembedding and the creation of “global finance space.” In The global economy in transition, ed. P. Daniels and W. Lever, 62–80. Essex, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G. 1999. Place, politics and scale dependence: Exploring the structuration of Euro regionalism. European Urban and Regional Studies 6:231–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G., and M. Goodwin. 1999. Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: On the state, politics, scale and explanation. Political Geography 18:697–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, B. 2007. Property, markets, and dispossession: The western Alaska community development quota as neoliberalism, social justice, both, and neither. Antipode 39 (3): 479–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, S. 2000. The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography 24 (2): 219–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, A., and A. Julian. 2009. Thematic study on the developmental effectiveness of untied aid: Evaluation of the implementation of the Paris Declaration and of the 2001 DAC recommendation on untying ODA to the LDCs: Lao PDR country study. Hanoi, Vietnam: Mekong Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Mekong River Commission. 2009. Hydropower sector review for the joint basin planning process: Basin Development Plan Program Phase II. Draft report, February 2009. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S.M. 1988. Legal pluralism. Law and Society Review 22 (5): 869–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, R. 2005. The restatement of non state law: The state, choice of law, and the challenge from global legal pluralism. The Wayne Law Review 51:1209–59.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, C., J. Garcia, and T. Foran. 2009. Old and new hydropower players in the Mekong region: Agendas and strategies. In Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance, ed. F. Molle, T. Foran, and M. Kakonen, 23–54. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Industry and Handicraft. 2004. Power System Development Plan for Lao PDR. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Ministry of Industry and Handicraft.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Planning and Investment. 2010. The Seventh National Socio-Economic Development Plan 2011–2015. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Ministry of Planning and Investment.
   Google Scholar
• Molle, F., T. Foran, and M. Kakonen. 2009. Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S. 1978. Law and social change: The semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate subject of study. In Law as a process: An anthropolitical approach, ed. S. Moore, 54–81. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MPI records investment value in excess of US$3.04 billion. 2013. Vientiane Times 21 October.
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh, C. 2010. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30:19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2001. Neoliberalizing states: Thin policies/hard outcomes. Progress in Human Geography 25 (3): 445–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randeria, S. 2007. The state of globalization: Legal plurality, overlapping sovereignties and ambiguous alliances between civil society and the cunning state in India. Theory Culture and Society 24 (1): 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, J. 2008. Foreign as domestic affairs: Rethinking horizontal federalism and foreign affairs preemption in light of translocal internationalism. Emory Law Journal 57 (1): 31–92.
   Google Scholar
• de Santos, B.. 1987. Law: A map of misreading. Toward a postmodern conception of law. Journal of Law and Society 14 (3): 279–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Santos, B.. 2002. Towards a new legal common sense. London: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• de Santos, B.. 2006. The heterogeneous state and legal pluralism in Mozambique. Law and Society Review 40 (1): 39–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Santos, B., and C.A. Rodriguez-Garavito. 2005. Law and globalization from below: Towards a cosmopolitan legality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P.W. 2003. Corporate warriors: The rise of the privatized military industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sneddon, C. 2003. Reconfiguring scale and power: The Khong Chi Mun project in northeast Thailand. Environment and Planning 35:2229–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiertz, J., and M.G. Wiber. 1996. The role of law in natural resource management. The Hague, The Netherlands: VUGA.
   Google Scholar
• Suhardiman, D., S. de Silva, and J. Carew-Reid. 2011. Policy review and institutional analysis of the hydropower sector in Lao PDR, Cambodia, and Vietnam. Final report prepared by IWMI for the Challenge Program Water and Food. Vientiane, Lao PDR: International Water Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Suhardiman, D., M. Giordano, and F. Molle. Forthcoming. Between interests and worldviews: The narrow path of the Mekong River Commission. Environment Planning C: Government and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation. 2012. Governance and public administration reform in Lao PDR. Berne: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 1997. Neither global nor local: “Glocalization” and the politics of scale. In Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local, ed. K. Cox, 137–66. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• von Benda-Beckmann, F. 1997. Citizens, strangers, and indigenous peoples: Conceptual politics and legal pluralism. Law Anthropology 9:1–42.
   Google Scholar
• von Benda-Beckmann, F., K. von Benda-Beckmann, and J. Spiertz 1996. Water rights and water policy. In The role of law in natural resource management, ed. J. Spiertz and M.G. Wiber, 77–100. The Hague, The Netherlands: VUGA.
   Google Scholar
• von Benda-Beckmann, K. 1981. Forum shopping and shopping forums: Dispute processing in a Minangkabau village in West Sumatra. Journal of Legal Pluralism 19:117–59.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada, N. 2013. Rethinking of “Chintanakan Mai”: New perspective for understanding Lao PDR. IDE Discussion Paper 393, Institute of Developing Economics, Chiba, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. 1994. Case study research: Designs and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar