Urban Stream Deserts as a Consequence of Excess Stream Burial in Urban Watersheds

References

• Alexander, R. B., E. W. Boyer, R. A. Smith, G. E. Schwarz, and R. B. Moore. 2007. The role of headwater streams in downstream water quality. Journal of American Water Resources Association 43 (1): 41–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Rivers. 2006. Daylighting streams: Breathing life into urban streams and communities. http://www.americanrivers.org/DaylightingReport (last accessed 1 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, C. L., Jr., and C. J. Gibbons. 1996. Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association 62:243–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, N. J. 1992. The lost rivers of London: A study of their effects upon London and Londoners, and the effects of London and Londoners on them. London: Historical Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Beam, J. D., and J. J. Braunscheidel. 1998. Rouge River assessment. Fisheries Division Special Report Number 22, State of Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. S., and M. A. Palmer. 2007. Restoring streams in an urbanizing world. Freshwater Biology 52:738–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. S., M. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, et al. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308 (5722): 636–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beschta, R. L., and W. S. Platts. 1986. Morphological features of small streams: Significance and function. Water Resources Bulletin 22 (3): 369–79.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, D. B. 1990. Stream channel incision following drainage-basin urbanization. Water Resources Bulletin 26:407–17.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2005. Challenges and prospects for restoring urban streams: A perspective from the Pacific Northwest of North America. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:724–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz, T., and T. Younos. 2007. Urban stream daylighting case study evaluations. Blacksburg: Virginia Water Research Center, Virginia Tech.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, A. 2006. Urban transformation of river landscapes in a global context. Geomorphology 79:460–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• County, P. G. S., and M. D. June. 1999. Low-impact development design strategies: An integrated design approach. Document No. EPA 841-B-00-003, Department of Environmental Resources, Programs and Planning Division, Prince George's County, Maryland, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Damodaram, C., M. H. Giacomoni, C. Prakash Khedun, H. Holmes, A. Ryan, W. Saour, and E. M. Zechman. 2010. Simulation of combined best management practices and low impact development for sustainable stormwater management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46 (5): 907–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detroit Water and Sewerage Department. 2003. Urban streams restoration, City of Detroit. Wastewater Master Plan, DWSD Project No. CS-1314, Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Draus, P. 2009. Substance abuse and slow-motion disasters: The case of Detroit. The Sociological Quarterly 50 (2): 360–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore, A. J., J. P. Julian, S. M. Guinn, and M. C. Fitzpatrick. 2013. Potential stream density in mid-Atlantic U.S. watersheds. PLOS ONE 8 (8): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore, A. J., and S. S. Kaushal. 2008. Disappearing headwaters: Patterns of stream burial due to urbanization. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6 (6): 308–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Fresca, B., and J. M. Sharp, Jr. 2005. Hydrogeologic considerations of urban development: Urban-induced recharge. Reviews in Engineering Geology 16:123–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gomi, T., R. C. Sidle, and J. S. Richardson. 2002. Understanding processes and downstream linkages of headwater systems. BioScience 52 (10): 905–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorchow, Z. 2009. Detroit officials cite costs in canceled sewer deal. Detroit Free Press 30 May 2009:A3.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, W. L. 1975. The impact of suburbanization on fluvial geomorphology. Water Resources Research 11 (5): 690–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 1977. Network characteristics in suburbanizing streams. Water Resources Research 13 (2): 459–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagler, Y. 2009. Defining U.S. megaregions. New York: Regional Plan Association.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, M. J., R. B. Singh, and J. Krecek. 1998. Headwater control: Matters arising. In Headwaters: Water resources and soil conservation, ed. M. J. Haigh, J. Krecek, G. S. Rajwar, and M. P. Kilmartin, 3–24. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A. A. Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, T. R. 1972. Stream channel enlargement due to urbanization. Water Resources Research 8:1530–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannam, I. D. 1979. Urban soil erosion: An extreme phase in the Stewart subdivision, West Bathurst. Journal of the Soil Conservation Service of NSW 35:19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hartig, J. H. 2010. Burning rivers: Revival of four urban industrial rivers that caught fire. Essex, UK: Multi-Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbs, B. J., and J. M. Sharp, Jr. 2012. Hydrogeological impacts of urbanization. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience 18 (1): 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hietala-Koivu, R., J. Lankoski, and S. Tarmi. 2004. Loss of biodiversity and its social cost in an agricultural landscape. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 103 (1): 75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., D. Tuomori, and R. Sinha. 1999. Impacts of on-site sewage systems and illicit discharges on the Rouge River. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Retrofit Opportunities for Water Resource Protection in Urban Environments, 132–35. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushal, S. S., and K. T. Belt. 2012. The urban watershed continuum: Evolving spatial and temporal dimensions. Urban Ecosystems 15:409–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, L. B., R. Huppman, and A. Miller. 2005. Geomorphic effects of urbanization in forty-one years of observation. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 149 (3): 349–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, L. B., M. G. Wolman, and J. P. Miller. 1964. Fluvial processes in geomorphology. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• McMahan, G., and T. F. Cuffney. 2000. Quantifying urban intensity in drainage basins for assessing stream ecological conditions. Journal of American Water Resource Association 36:1247–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. L., M. J. Paul, and W. K. Taulbee. 2005. Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes. Journal of North American Benthological Society 24 (3): 602–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. L., and J. B. Wallace. 2001. Lost linkages and lotic ecology: Rediscovering small streams. In Ecology: Achievement and challenge, ed. M. C. Press, N. J. Huntly, and S. Levin, 295–317. Williston, VT: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, K. S. 1996. Statistical comparisons of heavy-metal concentrations in river sediments. Environmental Geology 27 (1): 54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, K. S., D. Cauvet, M. Lybeer, and J. C. Thomas. 1999. Particle size and chemical control of heavy metals in bed sediment from the Rouge River, Southeast Michigan. Environmental Science and Technology 33 (7): 987–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, T. L., and M. C. Rains. 2007. Hydrological connectivity between headwater streams and downstream waters: How science can inform policy. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43 (1): 118–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuhfer, A. J. 1989. An assessment of River Rouge quality using the index of biotic integrity. Fisheries Research Report 1962, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, M. J., and J. L. Meyer. 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:333–65.
   Google Scholar
• Pennino, M. J., S. S. Kaushal, J. J. Beaulieu, P. M. Mayer, and C. P. Arango. 2014. Effects of urban stream burial on nitrogen uptake and ecosystem metabolism: Implications for watershed nitrogen and carbon fluxes. Biogeochemistry 121:247–69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkham, R. 2000. Daylighting: New life for buried streams. Old Snowmass, CO: Rocky Mountain Institute. http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid172.asp (last accessed 3 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Pinkham, R., R. Serrano, E. Kwanza, and P. Krishna. 2001. Three rivers second nature stream restoration and daylighting report. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon.
   Google Scholar
• Regional Plan Association. 2006. America 2050: A prospectus. New York: Regional Plan Association. http://www.america2050.org/pdf/America2050.org/pdf/America2050prospectus.pdf (last accessed 10 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Rouge River Remedial Action Plan Revision. 2004. Rouge River remedial action plan revision. http://epa.gov/greatlakes/aoc/rougeriver/index.html (last accessed 30 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. H., A. L. Dybas, K. M. Fritz, and H. R. Lubbers. 2009. Urbanization affects the extent and hydrologic permanence of headwater streams in a midwestern US metropolitan area. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28 (4): 911–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schueler, T. R. 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques 1:100–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stammler, K. L., A. G. Yates, and R. C. Bailey. 2013. Buried streams: Uncovering a potential threat to aquatic ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 114:37–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, M. K., J. B. Heffernan, N. Bettez, J. Cavender-Bares, P. M. Groffman, J. M. Grove, S. Hall, et al. 2014. Convergent surface water distributions in U.S. cities. Ecosystems 17:685–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimble, S. J. 1997. Contribution of stream channel erosion to sediment yield from an urbanizing watershed. Science 278:1442–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Population Estimates and Projections Section. 2011. World population prospects: The 2012 revision. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Documentation/publications.htm (last accessed 2 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2014. Geography: Federal Register notices. http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/frn.html (last accessed 30 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. Detroit River–Western Lake Erie Basin Indicator Project, INDICATOR: Combined sewer overflow controls in southeast Michigan. http://www.epa.gov/med/grosseile_site/indicators/cso.html (last accessed 2 November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Veliz, M., and J. S. Richards. 2005. Enclosing surface drains: What's the story? Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60 (3): 70–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E. J. 1994a. Nobody planted in, it just grew! Young adolescents' perceptions and experiences of nature in the context of urban environmental education. Children's Environment 11 (3): 177–93.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1994b. Pollution stinks: Young adolescents' perceptions of nature and environmental issues with implications for education in urban settings. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Book Center.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. J., A. H. Roy, J. W. Feminella, P. D. Cottingham, P. M. Groffman, and R. P. Morgan. 2005. The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of North American Benthological Society 24 (3): 706–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, S. J., A. H. Roy, C. R. Jackson, E. S. Bernhardt, T. L. Carter, S. Filoso, C. A. Gibson, et al. 2009. Twenty-six key research questions in urban stream ecology: An assessment of the state of the science. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28 (4): 1080–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, A. P., P. L. Angermeier, and A. E. Rosenberger. 2005. Impacts of new highways and subsequent landscape urbanization on stream habitat and biota. Reviews in Fisheries Science 13:141–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wipfli, M. S., J. S. Richardson, and R. J. Naiman. 2007. Ecological linkages between headwaters and downstream ecosystems: Transport of organic matter, invertebrates, and wood down headwater channels. Journal of American Water Resources Association 43 (1): 72–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar