Spatial Thinking in Geographic Information Science: Students' Geospatial Conceptions, Map-Based Reasoning, and Spatial Visualization Ability

References

• Alcock, L., and A. Simpson. 2011. Classification and concept consistency. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 11:91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarz, S. W. 2011. Maps and spatial thinking skills in the AP Human Geography classroom. New York: College Board AP Central. http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/courses/teachers_corner/151317.html (last accessed 15 May 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., P. J. Feltovich, and R. Glaser. 1981. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 5:121–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiBiase, D., M. DeMers, A. Johnson, K. Kemp, A. T. Luck, B. Plewe, and E. Wentz, eds. 2006. Geographic information science and technology body of knowledge. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrom, R. B., J. W. French, H. H. Harman, and D. Dermen. 1976. Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Gersmehl, P. J., and C. A. Gersmehl. 2007. Spatial thinking by young children: Neurologic evidence for early development and “educability.” Journal of Geography 106:181–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G. 2002. The nature of geographic knowledge. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G., M. Marsh, and S. Battersby. 2008a. A conceptual framework for facilitating geospatial thinking. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98:285–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2008b. Matching geospatial concepts with geographic educational needs. Geographical Research 46:85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G., and R. J. Stimson. 1997. Spatial behavior. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. 2001. A geographer looks at spatial information theory. In Spatial information theory, ed. D. R. Montello, 1–13. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2006. The fourth R? Rethinking GIS education. Arc News 28 (3): 11.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2010. Twenty years of progress: GIScience in 2010. Journal of Spatial Information Science 1:3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hall-Wallace, M. K., and C. M. McAuliffe. 2002. Design, implementation, and evaluation of GIS-based learning materials in an introductory geoscience course. Journal of Geoscience Education 50:5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M. 2010. Components of spatial intelligence. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 52:265–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirtle, S. C., and J. Jonides. 1985. Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory and Cognition 13:208–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, T. 2013. Geospatial thinking and spatial ability: An empirical examination of knowledge and reasoning in geographical science. The Professional Geographer 65: 636–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, T., and D. R. Montello. 2006. Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive Psychology 52:93–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, T., S. Nakata, and Y. Asami. 2011. Perception and conceptualization of house floor plans: An experimental analysis. Environment and Behavior 43:233–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janelle, D. G., and M. F. Goodchild. 2009. Location across disciplines: Reflection on the CSISS experience. In Geospatial technology and the role of location in science, ed. H. J. Scholten, R. van de Velde, and N. van Manen, 15–29. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2011. Concepts, principles, tools, and challenges in spatially integrated social science. In Sage handbook of GIS and society, ed. T. L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis, and R. McMaster, 27–45. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kali, Y., and N. Orion. 1996. Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33:369–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastens, K. A., and T. Ishikawa. 2006. Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: A cross-disciplinary look at the intersections of the two fields. In Earth and mind (Special Paper 413), ed. C. A. Manduca and D. W. Mogk, 53–76. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Keehner, M. M., F. Tendick, M. V. Meng, H. P. Anwar, M. Hegarty, M. L. Stoller, and Q. Duh. 2004. Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. American Journal of Surgery 188:71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, P. L., and S. A. Marston. 1998. Human geography: Places and regions in global context. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., M. Motes, and M. Hegarty. 2007. Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science 31:549–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B. 1964. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, W. 2012. Core concepts of spatial information for transdisciplinary research. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26:2267–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and R. Bednarz. 2012. Components of spatial thinking: Evidence from a spatial thinking ability test. Journal of Geography 111:15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liben, L. S., and R. M. Downs. 1993. Understanding person–space–map relations: Cartographic and developmental perspectives. Developmental Psychology 29:739–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, M. G. 1979. Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin 86:889–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittendorf, E., B. Mateev, and P. Schäuble. 2000. Using the co-occurrence of words for retrieval weighting. Information Retrieval 3:243–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakaya, T. 1997. Statistical inference in bidimensional regression models. Geographical Analysis 29:169–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2006. Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N. S. 2010. Increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator 34 (2): 29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Nyerges, T. L. 1991. Analytical map use. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 18:11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pothos, E. M., and N. Chater. 2002. A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization. Cognitive Science 26:303–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E., and C. B. Mervis. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7:573–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smidts, D. P., R. Jacobs, and V. Anderson. 2004. The Object Classification Task for Children (OCTC): A measure of concept generation and mental flexibility in early childhood. Developmental Neuropsychology 26:385–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solem, M., I. Cheung, and M. B. Schlemper. 2008. Skills in professional geography: An assessment of workforce needs and expectations. The Professional Geographer 60:356–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, N., and A. Okabe. 2007. Word clustering based on co-occurrence information in English GIS textbooks. Theory and Applications of GIS 15:81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. 1994. Bidimensional regression. Geographical Analysis 26:187–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wai, J., D. Lubinski, and C. P. Benbow. 2009. Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology 101:817–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar