1,188
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Conceptualizing and Analyzing Mobility

Developing a Framework for the Spaces and Spatialities of Transportation and Mobilities

&
Pages 257-265 | Received 01 Dec 2014, Accepted 01 Jun 2015, Published online: 04 Jan 2016

References

  • Amin, A. 2002. Spatialities of globalisation. Environment and Planning A 34 (3): 385–400.
  • Arias, S. 2010. Rethinking space: An outsider's view of the spatial turn. GeoJournal 75 (1): 29–41.
  • Bajerski, A. 2010. Anglo-amerykańska dominacja w geografii: Główne wa̧tki dyskusji prowadzonej w ramach geografii krytycznej [Anglo-American domination in geography: The main threads of a discussion conducted within the framework of critical geography]. Przeglad Geograficzny 82 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 143–58.
  • Banister, D. 2008. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy 15 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 73–80.
  • Banister, D., and Y. Berechman. 2001. Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of Transport Geography 9 (3): 209–18.
  • Barry, A. 2013. Material politics: Disputes along the pipeline. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Bear, C., and S. Eden. 2008. Making space for fish: The regional, network and fluid spaces of fisheries certification. Social & Cultural Geography 9 (5): 487–504.
  • Bissell, D. 2007. Animating suspension: Waiting for mobilities. Mobilities 2 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 277–98.
  • Budd, L., M. Bell, and T. Brown. 2009. Of plagues, planes and politics: Controlling the global spread of infectious diseases by air. Political Geography 28 (7): 426–35.
  • Carter, A. 2014. Winnipeg derailment renews safety concerns about crude oil shipments. Global News 20 June. http://globalnews.ca/news/1407694/winnipeg-derailment-renews-safety-concerns-about-crude-oil-shipments/ (last accessed 11 November 2015).
  • Cidell, J. 2011. Fear of a foreign railroad: Transnationalism, trainspace, and (im)mobility in the Chicago suburbs. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 (4): 593–608.
  • ———. 2012a. Flows and pauses in the urban logistics landscape: The municipal regulation of shipping container mobilities. Mobilities 7 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 233–45.
  • ———. 2012b. Just passing through: The risky mobilities of hazardous materials transport. Social Geography 7 (1): 13–22.
  • Cidell, J., and D. Prytherch. 2015. Transportation and mobility in the production of urban space. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Cowen, D. 2014. The deadly life of logistics: Mapping violence in global trade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Dicken, P., and A. Malmberg. 2001. Firms in territories: A relational perspective. Economic Geography 77 (4): 345–63.
  • Fall, J., and C. Minca. 2012. Not a geography of what doesn't exist, but a counter-geography of what does: Rereading Giuseppe Dematteis' Le Metafore della Terra. Progress in Human Geography 37 (4): 542–63.
  • Finnegan, D. A. 2008. The spatial turn: Geographical approaches in the history of science. Journal of the History of Biology 41 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 369–88.
  • Fleming, D. K., and Y. Hayuth. 1994. Spatial characteristics of transportation hubs: Centrality and intermediacy. Journal of Transport Geography 2 (1): 3–18.
  • ForestEthics. 2014. Oil train blast zone. http://explosive-crude-by-rail.org/ (last accessed 15 October 2015).
  • Frétigny, J. B. 2013. La frontière à l'épreuve des mobilités aériennes: Étude de l'aéroport de Paris Charles-de-Gaulle [The border put to the test of air mobilities: The example of Paris Charles de Gaulle airport]. Annales de géographie 2:151–74.
  • Garcia-Ramon, M.-D. 2004. On diversity and difference in geography: A southern European perspective. European Urban and Regional Studies 11 (4): 367–70.
  • Goetz, A. R., T. M. Vowles, and S. Tierney. 2009. Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide in transport geography. The Professional Geographer 61 (3): 323–35.
  • Häkli, J. 2008. Regions, networks and fluidity in the Finnish nation-state. National Identities 10 (1): 5–20.
  • Hall, P. V., and M. Hesse, eds. 2012. Cities, regions and flows. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Hanson, S. 2003. Transportation: Hooked on speed, eyeing sustainability. In A companion to economic geography, ed. E. Sheppard and T. Barnes, 469–83. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • ———. 2006. Viewpoint: Imagine. Journal of Transport Geography 14:232–33.
  • Hesse, M., and J. P. Rodrigue. 2004. The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution. Journal of Transport Geography 12 (3): 171–84.
  • Ho, E. L. E. 2011. “Claiming” the diaspora: Elite mobility, sending state strategies and the spatialities of citizenship. Progress in Human Geography 35 (6): 757–72.
  • Howitt, R. 1998. Scale as relation: Musical metaphors of geographical scale. Area 30 (1): 49–58.
  • Hui, A. 2012. Things in motion, things in practices: How mobile practice networks facilitate the travel and use of leisure objects. Journal of Consumer Culture 12 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 195–215.
  • Hull, A. 2008. Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy 15 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 94–103.
  • Jessop, B., N. Brenner, and M. Jones. 2008. Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26 (3): 389.
  • Jonas, A. E. 2006. Pro scale: Further reflections on the “scale debate” in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31 (3): 399–406.
  • Jones, M. 2009. Phase space: Geography, relational thinking, and beyond. Progress in Human Geography 33 (4): 487–506.
  • Kenyon, S., G. Lyons, and J. Rafferty. 2002. Transport and social exclusion: Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. Journal of Transport Geography 10 (3): 207–19.
  • Kesselring, S. 2006. Pioneering mobilities: New patterns of movement and motility in a mobile world. Environment and Planning A 38 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 269–79.
  • Kitchin, R. 2003. Cuestionando y desestabilizando la hegemonía angloamericana y del inglés en geografía [Questioning and destabilizing the hegemony of Anglo-America and of English in geography]. Documents d'Anàlisi Geogràfica 42:17–36.
  • Knowles, R. D. 2006. Transport shaping space: Differential collapse in time–space. Journal of Transport Geography 14 (6): 407–25.
  • Kortelainen, J. 2010. Old-growth forests as objects in complex spatialities. Area 42 (4): 494–501.
  • Law, J., and A. Mol. 2001. Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities. Environment and Planning D 19:609–21.
  • Leitner, H., E. Sheppard, and K. M. Sziarto. 2008. The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 157–72.
  • Marston, S. A. 2000. The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography 24 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 219–42.
  • Marston, S. A., J. P. Jones, and K. Woodward. 2005. Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (4): 416–32.
  • Massey, D. 2005. For space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Merriman, P. 2004. Driving places: Marc Augé, non-places, and the geographies of England's M1 motorway. Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4–5): 145–67.
  • Middleton, J. 2009. “Stepping in time”: Walking, time, and space in the city. Environment and Planning A 41 (8): 1943–61.
  • Miller, H. J. 1999. Measuring space–time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational procedures. Geographical Analysis 31 (1): 1–26.
  • Millward, L. 2008. Women in imperial airspace, 1922–1937. Montreal and Kingston, ON, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
  • Mol, A., and J. Law. 1994. Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science 24 (4): 641–71.
  • Mouawad, J. 2014. Bakken crude, rolling through Albany. New York Times 27 February 2104. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/28/business/energy-environment/bakkan-crude-rolling-through-albany.html (last accessed 11 November 2015).
  • Neutens, T., M. Delafontaine, D. M. Scott, and P. De Maeyer. 2012. An analysis of day-to-day variations in individual space–time accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography 23:81–91.
  • Oakley, D. 2014. Demonstration over “bomb trains” hauling crude oil in Richmond. San Jose Mercury News 31 May 2014. http://www.mercurynews.com/my-town/ci_25873144/demonstration-over-bomb-trains-hauling-crude-oil-richmond (last accessed 11 November 2015).
  • O'Kelly, M. E. 1998. A geographer's analysis of hub-and-spoke networks. Journal of Transport Geography 6 (3): 171–86.
  • Peters, M. A., and F. Kessl. 2009. Space, time, history: The reassertion of space in social theory. Policy Futures in Education 7 (1): 20–30.
  • Prout, S. 2009. Security and belonging: Reconceptualising Aboriginal spatial mobilities in Yamatji country, Western Australia. Mobilities 4 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 177–202.
  • Prytherch, D. 2010. ‘Vertebrating’ the region as networked space of flows: Learning from the spatial grammar of Catalanist territoriality. Environment and Planning A 42:1537–54.
  • Richardson, D. B., N. D. Volkow, M. P. Kwan, R. M. Kaplan, M. F. Goodchild, and R. T. Croyle. 2013. Spatial turn in health research. Science 339 (6126): 1390–92.
  • Robertson, S. 2007. Visions of urban mobility: The Westway, London, England. Cultural Geographies 14 (1): 74–91.
  • Rodrigue, J. P. 2006. Transportation and the geographical and functional integration of global production networks. Growth and Change 37 (4): 510–25.
  • Schwanen, T. 2015. Geographies of transport I: Reinventing a field? Progress in Human Geography. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0309132514565725
  • Shaw, J., and M. Hesse. 2010. Transport, geography and the “new” mobilities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (3): 305–12.
  • Shaw, J., and J. D. Sidaway. 2010. Making links: On (re)engaging with transport and transport geography. Progress in Human Geography 35 (4): 502–20.
  • Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A 38:207–26.
  • Sheppard, E. 2002. The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks, and positionality. Economic Geography 78 (3): 307–30.
  • Shoval, N., M. P. Kwan, K. H. Reinau, and H. Harder. 2014. The shoemaker's son always goes barefoot: Implementations of GPS and other tracking technologies for geographic research. Geoforum 51:1–5.
  • Skrbek, K. 1977. Dopravná geografia Československa a svetadielov [Transportation geography of Czechoslovakia and the continents: Volume 1]. Bratislava, Slovakia: Alfa.
  • Smith, D. A., and M. Timberlake. 1995. Conceptualising and mapping the structure of the world system's city system. Urban Studies 32 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 287–302.
  • Spinney, J. 2006. A place of sense: A kinaesthetic ethnography of cyclists on Mont Ventoux. Environment and Planning D 24 (5): 709–32.
  • Swyngedouw, E. 2004. Scaled geographies: Nature, place and the politics of scale. In Scale and geographic inquiry, ed. E. Sheppard and R. McMaster, 129–53. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Thill, J. C. 2000. Geographic information systems for transportation in perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 8 (1): 3–12.
  • Timár, J. 2007. Differences and inequalities: The “double marginality” of east central European feminist geography. Documents d'Anàlisi Geogràfica 49:73–98.
  • Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. London: Polity.
  • Vannini, P. 2011. Constellations of ferry (im)mobility: Islandness as the performance and politics of insulation and isolation. Cultural Geographies 18 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 249–71.
  • Watts, L. 2008. The art and craft of train travel. Social & Cultural Geography 9 (6): 711–26.
  • Wilhelm, S. 2013. Opening the spigot: Why Washington could become a major global fuel supplier. Puget Sound Business Journal 6 September 2013. http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2013/09/05/opening-the-spigot-why-washingtons.html (last accessed 11 November 2015).
  • Williams, A. J. 2011. Reconceptualising spaces of the air: Performing the multiple spatialities of UK military airspaces. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36 (2 Geographies of Mobility): 253–67.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.