References
- Bach, K. 1987. On Communicative Intentions: A Reply to Récanati. Mind and Language 2/2: 141–54.
- Bach, K. 2006. What Does it Take to Refer?, in The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Language, ed. E. Lepore and B. Smith, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 516–54.
- Bach, K. and Harnish, M. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
- Bezuidenhout, A. 1997. The Communication of De Re Thoughts, Noûs 31/2: 197–225.
- García-Carpintero, M. 2000. A Presuppositional Account of Reference-Fixing, The Journal of Philosophy 97/3: 109–47.
- Grice, H. P. 1969. Utterer's Meaning and Intentions, The Philosophical Review 78/2: 147–77.
- Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Heck, R. 1995. The Sense of Communication, Mind 104/413: 79–106.
- Loar, B. 1976. The Semantics of Singular Terms, Philosophical Studies 30/6: 353–77.
- Paul M. P. 1999. Success in Referential Communication, Philosophical Studies Series Vol. 80, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Récanati, F. 1993. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
- Récanati, F. 1995. Quasi-Singular Propositions: The Semantics of Belief Reports, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Vol. 69: 175–93.
- Schiffer, S. 1981. Indexicals and the Theory of Reference, Synthese 49/1: 43–100.
- Schiffer, S. forthcoming. Aphonic Terms and the Deep Problem with Gricean Meaning, in Meanings and Other Things: Essays on Stephen Schiffer, ed. G. Ostertag, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Soames, S. 2002. Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Soames, S. 2008. The Gap between Meaning and Assertion: Why What We Literally Say Often Differs from What Our Words Literally Mean, in Philosophical Essays, Volume 1: Natural Language, What it Means & How We Use It, Princeton: Princeton University Press: 278–97.