Why Care about Being an Agent?

References

• Arruda, C.T. ( manuscript). Ideal Agents and Minimum Agents.
   Google Scholar
• Arruda, C.T. and D.J. Povinelli 2016. Chimps as Secret Agents, Synthese. 193/7: 2129–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruda, C.T. and D.J. Povinelli ( manuscript). Two Ways of Acting for Reasons.
   Google Scholar
• Andreou, C. 2007. Non-Relative Reasons and Humean Thought: If What Is a Reason for You is a Reason for Me, Where Does that Leave the Humean? Metaphilosophy 38/5: 654–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpaly, N. 2000. On Acting Rationally against One's Best Judgment, Ethics 110/3: 488–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagnoli, C. 2014. Starting Points: Kantian Constructivism Reassessed, Ratio Juris 27/3: 311–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bratman, M. 2007. Reflection, Planning and Temporally Extended Agency, in M. Bratman, Structures of Agency: Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 21–46.
   Google Scholar
• Broome, J. 2005. Does Rationality Give us Reasons? Philosophical Issues 15/1: 321–37.
   Google Scholar
• Broome, J. 2007. Is Rationality Normative? Disputatio 2/23: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dreier, J. 2001. Humean Doubts about Categorical Imperatives, in Varieties of Practical Reasoning, ed. E. Millgram, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press: 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, D. 2006. Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won't Come from What is Constitutive of Action, The Philosophical Review 115/2:169–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch, D. 2009. Can There Be A Global, Interesting, Coherent Constructivism About Practical Reason? Philosophical Explorations 12/3: 319–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch, D. 2011. Shmagency Revisited, in New Waves in Metaethics, ed. M. Brady, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan: 208–33.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, W.J. 2005. The Practical Turn in Ethical Theory: Korsgaard's Constructivism, Realism, and the Nature of Normativity, Ethics 115/4: 651–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, W.J. 2013. How Not To Be an Ethical Constructivist: A Critique of Korsgaard's Neo-Kantian Constitutivism, in Constructivism in Ethics, ed. C. Bagnoli, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrero, L. 2009. Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 4, ed. R. Shafer-Landau. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 303–34.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, P.1972. Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives, The Philosophical Review 81/3: 305–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. 1998a [ 1971]. Freedom of the Will and the Concept of the Person, in H. Frankfurt, The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. 1998b [ 1987]. Identification and Wholeheartedness, in H. Frankfurt, The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 159–76.
   Google Scholar
• Katsafanas, P. 2011. Activity and Passivity in Reflective Agency, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Vol. 6, ed. R. Shafer-Landau, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 219–54.
   Google Scholar
• Katsafanas, P. 2013. Agency and the Foundations of Ethics: Nietzschean Constitutivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katsafanas, P. 2014. Nietzsche and Kant on the Will: Two Models of Reflective Agency, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89/1: 185–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodny, N. 2005. Why Be Rational? Mind 114/455: 509–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, C.M. 1996. The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, C.M. 2008. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, C.M. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D. and P. Rawling 1991. Agent-Relativity and the Doing-Happening Distinction, Philosophical Studies 63/2: 167–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J.M. 2011. Toward an Ecological Theory of the Norms of Practical Deliberation, European Journal of Philosophy 19/4: 561–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K. 1972. Against Moral Conservativism, Ethics 82/3: 219–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hagan, E. 2014. Shmagents, Realism and Constitutivism About Rational Norms, Journal of Value Inquiry 48/1: 17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosati, C.S. 2003. Agency and the Open Question Argument, Ethics 113/3: 490–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosati, C.S. 2016. Agents and ‘Shmagents’: An Essay on Agency and Normativity, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Vol. 11, ed. R. Shafer-Landau, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 182–213.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T.M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, M. 2005. The Hypothetical Imperative? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83/3: 357–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafer-Landau, R. 2009. A Defence of Categorical Reasons, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109/1 pt.2: 189–206.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. 2012. Inescapability and Normativity, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (3). URL = www.jesp.org.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. 2015. The Shmagency Question, Philosophical Studies 172/5: 1127–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, S. 2010. What Is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics? Philosophy Compass 5/5: 363–84.
   Google Scholar
• Tiffany, E. 2012. Why Be An Agent?, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90/2: 223–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velleman, D. 1989. Practical Reflection, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, D. 2000a. The Possibility of Practical Reason, in D. Velleman, The Possibility of Practical Reason, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 170–99.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, D. 2000b. What Happens When Someone Acts? in D. Velleman, The Possibility of Practical Reason, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 123–43.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, D. 2009. How We Get Along. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wedgwood, R. 2003. Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly, in Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality, ed. S. Stroud and C. Tappolet, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 201–29.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. 1981. Internal and External Reasons, in B. Williams, Moral Luck Philosophical Papers 1973-1980, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 101–13.
   Google Scholar