Discourse, Diversity, and Free Choice

References

• Brasoveanu, Adrian 2011. Plural Discourse Reference, in Handbook of Logic and Language, ed. Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, London: Elsevier: 1035–58.
   Google Scholar
• Brasoveanu, Adrian 2013. The Grammar of Quantification and Fine Structure of Interpretation Contexts, Synthese 190/15: 3001–51. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0118-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carston, Robyn 1998. Informativeness, Relevance and Scalar Implicature, in Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications, ed. Robyn Carston and Seiji Uchida, Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 179–238.
   Google Scholar
• Chemla, Emmanuel 2009. Universal Implicatures and Free Choice Effects: Experimental Data, Semantics and Pragmatics 2: 1–33. doi: 10.3765/sp.2.2
   Google Scholar
• Chemla, Emmanuel and Lewis Bott 2014. Processing Inferences at the Semantics/Pragmatics Frontier: Disjunctions and Free Choice, Cognition 130/3: 380–96. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chierchia, Gennaro, Danny Fox, and Benjamin Spector 2011. The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures and the Relationship between Semantics and Pragmatics, in Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 3, ed. Paul Portner, Claudia Maienborn, and Klaus von Heusinger, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton: 2297–332.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Laurence Jonathan 1971. Some Remarks on Grice’s Views About the Logical Particles of Natural Language, in Pragmatics of Natural Languages, ed. Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, Dordrecht: D. Reidel: 50–68.
   Google Scholar
• Eckardt, Regine 2007. Licensing or, in Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, ed. Uli Sauerland and Penka Stateva, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 34–70.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Gareth 1980. Pronouns, Linguistic Inquiry 11/2: 337–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Danny 2007. Free Choice and the Theory of Scalar Implicatures, in Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, ed. Uli Sauerland and Penka Stateva, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 71–120.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Danny and Roni Katzir 2011. On the Characterization of Alternatives, Natural Language Semantics 19/1: 87–107. doi: 10.1007/s11050-010-9065-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, Michael 2011. Quantity Implicatures, Exhaustive Interpretation, and Rational Conversation, Semantics and Pragmatics 4/1: 1–82.
   Google Scholar
• Gazdar, Gerald 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form, New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, Herbert Paul 1975. Logic and Conversation, in Speech Acts, ed. Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, Leiden: Brill Academic Press: 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Heim, Irene Roswitha 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. Disertation, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Kamp, Hans 1978. Semantics Versus Pragmatics, in Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages, ed. Franz Guenther and Seigfried J. Schmidt, Dordrecht: D. Reidel: 255–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kamp, Hans 1981. A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation, in Formal Methods in the Study of Language, ed. Jeroen A.G. Groenendijk, Theo M.V. Janssen, and Martin B.J. Stokhof, Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts: 277–322.
   Google Scholar
• Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle 1993. From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Karttunen, Lauri 1973. Presuppositions of Compound Sentences, Linguistic Inquiry 4/2: 169–93.
   Google Scholar
• Katzir, Roni 2007. Structurally-Defined Alternatives, Linguistics and Philosophy 30/6: 669–90. doi: 10.1007/s10988-008-9029-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinedinst, Nathan Winter 2007. Plurality and Possibility, Ph.D. Dissertation, Los Angeles, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, Angelika and Junko Shimoyama 2002. Indeterminate Pronouns: The View from Japanese, in Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kroch, Anthony 1972. Lexical and Inferred Meanings for Some Time Adverbs: Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David 1979. A Problem About Permission, in Essays in Honour of Jaakko Hintikka on the Occasion of His Fiftieth Birthday on January 12, 1979, ed. Esa Saarinen, Risto Hilpinen, Ilkka Niiniluoto, and Merrill Provence Hintikka, Dordrecht: D. Reidel: 163–75.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, Yo 1995. The Conversational Condition on Horn Scales, Linguistics and Philosophy 18/1: 21–60. doi: 10.1007/BF00984960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouwen, Rick 2007. On Dependent Pronouns and Dynamic Semantics, Journal of Philosophical Logic 36/2: 123–54. doi: 10.1007/s10992-006-9029-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouwen, Rick 2016. Plurality, in The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, ed. Maria Aloni and Paul Decker, Cambrige: Cambridge University Press: 267–84.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Craige 1989. Modal Subordination and Pronomial Anaphora in Discourse, Linguistics and Philosophy 12/6: 683–721. doi: 10.1007/BF00632602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Alf 1944. Imperatives and Logic, Philosophy of Science 11/1: 30–46. doi: 10.1086/286823
   Google Scholar
• Rullmann, Hotze, Lisa Methewson, and Henry Davis 2008. Modals as Distributive Indefinites, Natural Language Semantics 16/4: 317–57. doi: 10.1007/s11050-008-9036-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerland, Uli 2004. Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences, Linguistics and Philosophy 27/3: 367–91. doi: 10.1023/B:LING.0000023378.71748.db
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenker, Philippe 2004. Conditionals as Definite Descriptions, Research on Language and Computation 2/3: 417–62. doi: 10.1007/s11168-004-0908-2
   Google Scholar
• Schlenker, Philippe 2012. Generalised Quantification and Anaphora Across Ontological Domains: Evidence from ASL, UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, Theories of Everything 17: 382–8.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, Bernhard 2016. Consistency Preservation in Quantity Implicature: The Case of the Least, Semantics and Pragmatics 9: 1–47. doi: 10.3765/sp.9.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, Mandy 2011. Dynamic Pragmatics, or Why We Shouldn’t Be Afraid of Embedded Implicatures, Semantics and Linguistic Theory 21: 609–33. doi: 10.3765/salt.v21i0.2593
   Google Scholar
• Spector, Benjamin and Yasutada Sudo 2017. Presupposed Ignorance and Exhaustification: How Scalar Implicatures and Presuppositions Interact, Linguistics and Philosophy 40/5: 473–517. doi: 10.1007/s10988-017-9208-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudo, Yasutada 2016. The Existential Problem of Scalar Implicatures and Anaphora Across Alternatives, Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 11: 225–44.
   Google Scholar
• von Wright, George H. 1967. Deontic Logics, American Philosophical Quarterly 4/2: 136–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar