Intuitive Expertise in Moral Judgments

References

• Alexander, J. 2016. Philosophical Expertise, in A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, ed. J. Sytsma and W. Buckwalter, Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell: 555–67.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J., R. Mallon, and J.M. Weinberg 2010. Accentuate the Negative, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1/2: 297–314.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, J.R. and J. Monaghan 2018. Epistemic Closure in Folk Epistemology, in Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, Vol. 2, ed. T. Lombrozo, J. Knobe, and S. Nichols, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 38–70.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, H. 2012. Philosophy without Intuitions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J.A., M. Peterson, and B. van Bezooijen 2016. Not Knowing a Cat Is a Cat: Analyticity and Knowledge Ascriptions, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7/2: 817–34.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J.A., D. Pritchard, and J. Shepherd 2019. Knowledge-How, Understanding-Why and Epistemic Luck: An Experimental Study, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 10/4: 701–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. 2006. Two Approaches to the Study of Experts’ Characteristics, in The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, ed. K.A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, and R.R. Hoffman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cova, F. et al. forthcoming. Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy, Review of Philosophy and Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. 2015. The Myth of the Intuitive: Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Method, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feltz, A. and E. Cokely 2019. Extraversion and Compatibilist Intuitions: A Ten-Year Retrospective and Meta-Analyses, Philosophical Psychology 32/3: 388–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, P. 1967. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect, Oxford Review 5: 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, S., L. Lee, and E. Baskin 2014. The Limits of Attraction, Journal of Marketing Research 51/4: 487–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hales, S.D. 2006. Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, C. and J. Knobe 2009. Cause and Norm, The Journal of Philosophy 106/11: 587–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, R. 2007. What Is Wrong with Moral Testimony? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74/3: 611–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, J. 2010. How (Not) to React to Experimental Philosophy, Philosophical Psychology 23/4: 447–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, J. manuscript. Mischaracterization Reconsidered.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, J. and S. Koch 2021. Experimental Philosophy and the Method of Cases, Philosophy Compass 16/1: 1–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, J. and A. Wiegmann 2016. Intuitive Expertise and Intuitions about Knowledge, Philosophical Studies 173/10: 2701–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J., J.W. Payne, and C. Puto 1982. Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis, Journal of Consumer Research 9/1: 90–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J., J.W. Payne, and C.P. Puto 2014. Let’s Be Honest about the Attraction Effect, Journal of Marketing Research 51/4: 520–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J. and C. Puto 1983. Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects, Journal of Consumer Research 10/1: 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K. 1999. Second-Hand Moral Knowledge, The Journal of Philosophy 96/2: 55–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K. and F. Schroeter 2012. Moral Expertise, Analyse & Kritik 34/2: 217–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. and G. Klein 2009. Conditions for Intuitive Expertise: A Failure to Disagree, American Psychologist 64/6: 515–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. 2020. A Defense of the Very Idea of Moral Deference Pessimism, Philosophical Studies 177/8: 2323–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, S.M., A. Wiegmann, J. Alexander, and G. Vong 2012. Putting the Trolley in Order: Experimental Philosophy and the Loop Case, Philosophical Psychology 25/5: 661–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löhr, G. 2019. The Experience Machine and the Expertise Defense, Philosophical Psychology 32/2: 257–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, K. 2007. The Epistemology of Thought Experiments: First Person versus Third Person Approaches, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31/1: 128–59.
   Google Scholar
• Machery, E. 2012. Expertise and Intuitions about Reference, Theoria 27/1: 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machery, E. 2017. Philosophy within Its Proper Bounds, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machery, E., R. Mallon, S. Nichols, and S. Stich 2004. Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style, Cognition 92/3: B1–B12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nado, J. 2014. Philosophical Expertise, Philosophy Compass 9/9: 631–41.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. and J. Knobe 2007. Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions, Noûs 41/4: 663–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration 2015. Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science, Science 349/6251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palan, S. and C. Schitter 2018. Prolific.ac—A Subject Pool for Online Experiments, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 17: 22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrinovich, L. and P. O’Neill 1996. Influence of Wording and Framing Effects on Moral Intuitions, Ethology and Sociobiology 17/3: 145–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggeri, K. et al. 2019. Not Lost in Translation: Successfully Replicating Prospect Theory in 19 Countries, OSF Preprints URL = https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2nyd6
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, S. and P. Saint-Germier. manuscript. Philosophical Expertise Put to the Test.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, E., E.T. Cokely, and A. Feltz 2011. Persistent Bias in Expert Judgments about Free Will and Moral Responsibility: A Test of the Expertise Defense, Consciousness and Cognition 20/4: 1722–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E. and F. Cushman 2012. Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers, Mind & Language 27/2: 135–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E. and F. Cushman 2015. Philosophers’ Biased Judgments Persist Despite Training, Expertise and Reflection, Cognition 141: 127–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sytsma, J. and E. Machery 2010. Two Conceptions of Subjective Experience, Philosophical Studies 151/2: 299–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. 1985. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice, Marketing Science 4/3: 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J.J. 1971. A Defense of Abortion, Philosophy & Public Affairs 1/1: 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J.J. 1985. The Trolley Problem, The Yale Law Journal 94/6: 1395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobia, K., W. Buckwalter, and S. Stich 2013. Moral Intuitions: Are Philosophers Experts? Philosophical Psychology 26/5: 629–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobia, K.P., G.B. Chapman, and S. Stich 2013. Cleanliness Is Next to Morality, Even for Philosophers, Journal of Consciousness Studies 20/11–12: 195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice, Science 211/4481: 453–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, J.M. 2007. How to Challenge Intuitions Empirically without Risking Skepticism, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31/1: 318–43.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, J.M. 2015. The Methodological Necessity of Experimental Philosophy, Discipline Filosofiche 15/1: 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, J.M., C. Gonnerman, C. Buckner, and J. Alexander 2010. Are Philosophers Expert Intuiters? Philosophical Psychology 23/3: 331–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegmann, A., J. Horvath, and K. Meyer 2020. Intuitive Expertise and Irrelevant Options, Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, Vol. 3, ed. T. Lombrozo, J. Knobe, and S. Nichols, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 275–310.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegmann, A. and M.R. Waldmann 2014. Transfer Effects Between Moral Dilemmas: A Causal Model Theory, Cognition 131/1: 28–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. 2011. Philosophical Expertise and the Burden of Proof, Metaphilosophy 42/3: 215–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar