Is Epistemic Competence a Skill?

References

• Angier, T. 2010. Technē in Aristotle’s Ethics: Crafting the Moral Life, London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, S. 2017. Defending Exclusivity, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94/2: 326–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audi, R. 2001. An Internalist Theory of Normative Grounds, Philosophical Topics 29/1–2: 19–46.
   Google Scholar
• Baehr, J. 2011. The Inquiring Mind. On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BonJour, L. 1980. Externalist Theories of Empirical Knowledge, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5/1: 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• BonJour, L. 1999. Foundationalism and the External World, Noûs 13: 229–49.
   Google Scholar
• Chrisman, M. 2012. The Normative Evaluation of Belief and the Aspectual Classification of Belief and Knowledge Attributions, The Journal of Philosophy, 109/10: 588–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, L. 1987. Epistemic Responsibility, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. 1984. Justification and Truth, Philosophical Studies 46/3: 279–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, M. 2020. The Importance of Roles in the Skill Analogy, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 17/1: 75–102.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, P. 2013. Sosa on the Normativity of Belief, Philosophical Studies 166/3: 617–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, A.I. 1986. Epistemology and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greco, J. 2010. Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, D. 2021. How Reasoning Aims at Truth, Noûs 55/1: 221–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst, D. manuscript. The Distinctness of Virtue.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, T. 2016. Evidence, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), ed. E.N. Zalta, URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/evidence
   Google Scholar
• Foot, P. 1978 (2002). Virtues and Vices, in her Virtues and Vices: and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kelp, C. 2017. Knowledge First Virtue Epistemology, in Knowledge First: Approaches in Epistemology and Mind, ed. J.A. Carter, E.C. Gordon, and B.W. Jarvis, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 223–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kelp, C. 2019. How to Be a Reliabilist, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98/2: 346–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, A. 2017. Sources of Knowledge: On the Concept of a Rational Capacity for Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, E. 2018. The Importance of Being Rational, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. 1979. Virtue and Reason, The Monist 62/3: 331–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. 1995. Knowledge and the Internal, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55/4: 877–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, C. 2015. The Illusion of Exclusivity, European Journal of Philosophy 23/4: 1117–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miracchi, L. 2015. Competence to Know, Philosophical Studies 172/1: 29–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montmarquet, J. 1987. Epistemic Virtue, Mind 96/384: 482–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, A. W. 2004. Aristotle’s Conception of Ethical and Natural Virtue: How the Unity Thesis sheds light on the Doctrine of the Mean, in Was ist das für den Menschen Gute? Menschliche Natur und Güterlehre, What Is Good for a Human Being? Human Nature and Values, ed. J. Szaif and M. Lutz-Bachmann, Berlin: de Gruyter: 18–53.
   Google Scholar
• Nickel, P.J. 2010. Voluntary Belief on a Reasonable Basis, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81/2: 312–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, J. 2011. From Normativity to Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rinard, S. 2017. No Exception for Belief, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94/1: 121–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbaugh, G. 2015. Inner Achievement, Erkenntnis 80/6: 1191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setiya, K. 2007. Reasons without Rationalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, K. 2019. Rationality as the Capacity for Understanding, Noûs 53/3: 639–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, N. 2013. Why We Reason the Way We Do, Philosophical Issues, 23/1: 311–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silins, N. 2005. Deception and Evidence, Philosophical Perspectives 19/1: 375–404.
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, E. 2007. A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Vol. I, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, E. 2011. Knowing Full Well, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, E. 2015. Judgment and Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. and T. Williamson 2017. Skill, Noûs 51/4: 713–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stichter, M. 2018. The Skillfulness of Virtue: Improving our Moral and Epistemic Lives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvan, K. 2015. What Apparent Reasons Appear to Be, Philosophical Studies 172/3: 587–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvan, K. 2016. The Illusion of Discretion, Synthese 193/6: 1635–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turri, J. 2010. On the Relationship between Propositional and Doxastic Justification, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80/2: 323–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zagzebski, L.T. 1996. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar