137
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Goddard and Judge on Tractarian Objects

Received 04 Oct 2021, Accepted 16 Oct 2021, Published online: 17 Nov 2021

References

  • Allaire, Edwin 1966. The ‘Tractatus’: Nominalistic or Realistic?, in Essays on Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, ed. Irving M. Copi and Robert W. Beard, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul: 325–341.
  • Bradley, Raymond D. 1987. Wittgenstein’s Tractatarian Essentialism, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65/1: 43–55.
  • Conant, James 2000. Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein, in The New Wittgenstein, ed. Alice Crary and Rupert Read, London: Routledge: 174–217.
  • Copi, Irving M. 1958. Objects, Properties and Relations in the Tractatus, Mind 67/266: 145–65.
  • Diamond, Cora 1991. Throwing Away the Ladder: How to Read the Tractatus, in The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press: 179–204.
  • Diamond, Cora 2000. Ethics, Imagination and the Method of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, in The New Wittgenstein, ed. Alice Crary and Rupert Read, London: Routledge: 149–173.
  • Diamond, Cora. 2018. Commentary on José Zalabardo’s ‘The Tractatus on Unity’, Australasian Philosophical Review 2/3: 272–84.
  • Dummett, Michael 1981. The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. London: Duckworth.
  • Goddard, Leonard and Brenda Judge 1982. The Metaphysics of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, Bundoora: Australasian Association of Philosophy.
  • Griffin, James 1964. Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hacker, P.M.S. 1986. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hintikka, Merrill B. and Jaakko Hintikka 1986. Investigating Wittgenstein, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Johnston, Colin 2008. The Determination of Form by Syntactic Employment: A Model and a Difficulty, in Papers of the 31st International Wittgenstein Symposium 10–16 August 2008. Reduktion und Elimination in Philosophie und den Wissenschaften – Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences, ed. Alexander Hieke, and Hannes Leitgeb, Kirchberg am Wechsel: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society: 156–8.
  • Johnston, Colin 2009. Tractarian Objects and Logical Categories, Synthese 167/1: 145–61.
  • Kannisto, Heikki 1986. Thoughts and Their Subject: A Study of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, Helsinki: Philosophical Society of Finland.
  • McCarty, David 1991. The Philosophy of Logical Wholism, Synthese 87/1: 51–123.
  • Ramsey, Frank 1990. Universals, in F.P. Ramsey: Philosophical Papers, ed. D.H. Mellor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 8–33.
  • Skyrms, Brian 1981. Tractarian Nominalism (for Wilfrid Sellars), Philosophical Studies 40/2: 199–206.
  • Stenius, Erik 1960. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. A Critical Exposition of Its Main Lines of Thought, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Waismann, Friedrich 1979. Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle: Conversations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. C.K. Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1971. Prototractatus. An Early Version of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. David F. Pears and Brian F. McGuinness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1974a. Philosophical Grammar, trans. Anthony Kenny, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1974b. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 2nd edn, trans. David F. Pears and Brian F. McGuinness, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1975. Philosophical Remarks, trans. Raymond Hargreaves and Roger White, ed. Rush Rhees, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1979. Notebooks, 1914-1916, 2nd edn, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Zalabardo, José L. 2010. The Tractatus on Logical Consequence, European Journal of Philosophy 18/3: 425–42.
  • Zalabardo, José L. 2015. Representation and Reality in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Zalabardo, José L. 2018. Response to Commentaries on ‘The Tractatus on Unity’, Australasian Philosophical Review 2/3: 343–54.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.