Blameworthiness for Non-Culpable Attitudes

References

• Adams, Robert M. 1985. Involuntary Sins, The Philosophical Review 94/1: 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, Rima 2019. The Wrongs of Racist Belief, Philosophical Studies 176/9: 2497–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, Cheshire 1989. Responsibility and Reproach, Ethics 99/2: 389–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, Justin. D. 2020. The Ethics of Blame: A Primer, in The Ethics of Belief and Beyond: Understanding Mental Normativity, ed. Sebastian Schmidt and Gerhard Ernst, New York: Routledge: 192–214.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, Julia 2017. Wronging, Blame, and Forgiveness, in Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility Vol. 4, ed. David Shoemaker, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 206–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, John M. and Neal A. Tognazzini 2009. The Truth about Tracing, Noûs 43/3: 531–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda 2019. Forgiveness–An Ordered Pluralism, Australasian Philosophical Review 3/3: 241–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hieronymi, Pamela 2001. Articulating an Uncompromising Forgiveness, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62/3: 529–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hieronymi, Pamela 2004. The Force and Fairness of Blame, Philosophical Perspectives 18: 115–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hieronymi, Pamela 2006. Controlling Attitudes, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87/1: 45–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hieronymi, Pamela 2008. Responsibility for Believing, Synthese 161/3: 357–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hieronymi, Pamela 2009a. Believing at Will, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 39/S35: 149–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hieronymi, Pamela 2009b. Two Kinds of Agency, in Mental Actions, ed. Lucy O’Brien and Matthew Soteriou, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 138–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hieronymi, Pamela 2014. Reflection and Responsibility, Philosophy and Public Affairs 42/1: 3–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hieronymi, Pamela 2019. ‘I’ll Bet You Think This Blame is About You’, in Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility Vol. 5: Themes from the Philosophy of Gary Watson, ed. D. Justin Coates and Neal A. Tognazzini, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 60–87.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Jonathan 2001. Choosing Character: Responsibility for Virtue and Vice, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kavka, Gregory S. 1983. The Toxin Puzzle, Analysis 43/1: 33–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesewetter, Benjamin 2017. The Normativity of Rationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, Miriam S. 2015. Believing Against the Evidence: Agency and the Ethics of Belief, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, Conor 2013. Epistemic Responsibility and Doxastic Agency, Philosophical Issues 23: 132–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, Conor 2017. Attitudinal Control, Synthese 194/8: 2745–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meylan, Anne 2013. Foundations of an Ethics of Belief, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meylan, Anne 2017. The Consequential Conception of Doxastic Responsibility, Theoria 83/1: 4–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha 2016. Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, Justin 1992. Morality and the Emotions, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Robert C. 2021. A Social Solution to the Puzzle of Doxastic Responsibility, Synthese 198/10: 9335–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, David J. 2000. Reason without Freedom: The Problem of Epistemic Normativity, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, David J. 2017. Normativity and Control, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peels, Rik 2017. Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portmore, Douglas W./ 2019. Control, Attitudes, and Accountability, in Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility Vol. 6, ed. David Shoemaker, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Tom 2015. Emotional Regulation and Responsibility, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18/3: 487–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, Gideon 2004. Skepticism about Moral Responsibility, Philosophical Perspectives 18: 295–313.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, Thomas M. 2008. Moral Dimensions. Permissibility, Meaning, Blame, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Sebastian 2020a. Responsibility for Attitudes, Object-Given Reasons, and Blame, in The Ethics of Belief and Beyond. Understanding Mental Normativity, ed. Sebastian Schmidt and Gerhard Ernst, New York: Routledge: 149–75.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Sebastian 2020b. Rationality and Responsibility, Australasian Philosophical Review 4/4: 379–85.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Sebastian forthcoming. Epistemic Blame and the Normativity of Evidence, Erkenntnis.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Angela M. 2005. Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life, Ethics 115/2: 236–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Angela M. 2013. Moral Blame as Moral Protest, in Blame. Its Nature and Norms, ed. D. Justin Coates and Neal A. Tognazzini, New York: Oxford University Press: 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, Peter F. 1962. Freedom and Resentment, Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 187–211.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, David 2018. Is Agent-Regret Rational? Ethics 128/4: 788–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tognazzini, Neal 2020. Silence and Salience. On Being Judgmental, in The Ethics of Belief and Beyond. Understanding Mental Normativity, ed. Sebastian Schmidt and Gerhard Ernst, New York: Routledge: 256–69.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. Jay 1994. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Gary 2013. Standing in Judgment, in Blame: Its Nature and Norms, ed. D. Justin Coates and Neal A. Tognazzini, New York: Oxford University Press: 282–301.
   Google Scholar
• White, Stephen J. 2019. Against Voluntarism about Doxastic Responsibility, Journal of Philosophical Research 44: 33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Bernard 1981. Moral Luck, in his Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 20–39.
   Google Scholar